One can argue that the principle of equal opportunity supports age-based limits on life-extending medical care. There are two versions of this argument. The first version is that critically ill elderly patients have had more opportunity for well-being over their lifetimes than younger patients. Consequently, “age-based limits are supported by the principle of equal opportunity.” We can refer to this version as the “equal opportunity for lifetime well-being argument.” The second version is that these age-based limits can be defended on the grounds that, insofar as possible, there should be an equal opportunity to live to the same age as others. We can refer to this version as the “equal opportunity to live to the same age as others” argument.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2004 Springer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
(2004). Fair Innings and Need over a Lifetime. In: Medical Benefit And The Human Lottery. International Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine, vol 22. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-2973-8_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-2973-8_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-2970-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-2973-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive