Satisfaction with Health Care Systems

A Comparison of EU Countries
  • Jürgen Kohl
  • Claus Wendt
Part of the Social Indicators Research Series book series (SINS, volume 24)


Apart from the market and the family, welfare state institutions undoubtedly have a major impact on the living conditions of individuals and social groups. As a matter of fact, welfare state institutions can be differently organized and geared towards different goals (e.g. supplementing vs. replacing markets, equality vs. security, minimum standards vs. optimal standards), and hence are likely to have different consequences. The focus of this article, however, is not directly on measuring the impact of welfare state programs on living conditions, but rather on the subjective perception of social security as well as on the acceptance of welfare state institutions.

“Quality of life” has been conceptualized by Zapf (1984) as the combination of objective living conditions and subjective well-being, thereby distinguishing various welfare constellations. In a similar vein, we regard subjective social security as an element of the quality of life, and ask for the degree of correspondence between particular institutional arrangements of providing social security and citizens’ satisfaction with the performance of these institutions. The area of health care policy is taken as an example, but the general methodology could be applied to other fields of social policy as well.

Based on objective health system indicators from Oecd sources and Eurobarometer survey data, patterns of satisfaction with health care systems are explored cross-nationally. Welfare state regime types, level of health expenditure and “real” level of health services are taken into account as potential determinants. The findings basically point to the importance of institutional characteristics, almost regardless of the level of health expenditure. Since the analysis allows to evaluate the “success” of national health care systems to find popular satisfaction and approval, it may yield important clues for social policy reform.


Health Care System Health Care Service National Health Service Welfare State Health Expenditure 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alber, J. (1988): Die Gesundheitssysteme der Oecd-Länder im Vergleich. M. G. Schmidt (ed.): Staatstätigkeit. International und historisch vergleichende Analysen. Pvs, Sonderheft 19/1988, Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, 116–50.Google Scholar
  2. Esping-Andersen, G. (1990): The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  3. Esping-Andersen, G. (1999): Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economies, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Eurobarometer (1996): 44.3: Health Care Issues and Public Security. February — April 1996, Cologne: Central Archive for Empirical Social Research.Google Scholar
  5. Ferrera, M. (1998): The Four ‘Social Europes’: Between Universalism and Selectivity. M. Rhodes & Y. Mény (eds.): The Future of European Welfare: A New Social Contract?, London: Macmillan, 79–96.Google Scholar
  6. Flora, P., J. Alber & J. Kohl (1977): Zur Entwicklung der westeuropäischen Wohlfahrtsstaaten. Politische Vierteljahresschrift 18, 707–72.Google Scholar
  7. Kangas, O. (1994): The Politics of Social Security: On Regressions, Qualitative Comparisons, and Cluster Analysis. T. Janoski & A. M. Hicks (eds.): The Comparative Political Economy of the Welfare State, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 346–64.Google Scholar
  8. Kohl, J. (1999): Leistungsprofile wohlfahrtsstaatlicher Regimetypen. P. Flora & H.-H. Noll (eds.): Sozialberichterstattung und Sozialstaatsbeobachtung, Frankfurt/Main: Campus, 111–39.Google Scholar
  9. Leibfried, S. (1992): Towards a European Welfare State? On Integrating Poverty Regimes Into the European Community. Z. Ferge & J. E. Kolberg (eds.): Social Policy in a Changing Europe, Frankfurt/Main: Campus, 245–78.Google Scholar
  10. Mossialos, E. (1997): Citizens’ Views on Health Care Systems in the 15 Member States of the European Union. Health Economics 6, 109–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Noll, H.-H. (1997): Wohlstand, Lebensqualität und Wohlbefinden in den Ländern der Europäischen Union. S. Hradil & S. Immerfall (eds.): Die westeuropäischen Gesellschaften im Vergleich, Opladen: Leske & Budrich, 431–73.Google Scholar
  12. Nomesco (2001): Health Statistics in the Nordic Countries, Copenhagen: Nomesco.Google Scholar
  13. Oecd (2002): Oecd Health Data 2002. Comparative Analysis of 29 Countries, Paris: Oecd.Google Scholar
  14. Roller, E. (1992): Einstellungen der Bürger zum Wohlfahrtsstaat der Bundesrepublik Deutschland, Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Saltman, R. B. (1997): The Context of Health Reform in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Germany, and the United States. Health Policy 41, 9–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Schieber, G. J. & J.-P. Poullier (1990): Overview of International Comparisons of Health Care Expenditure. Oecd: Health Care Systems in Transition. The Search for Efficiency. Oecd Social Policy Studies No. 7, Paris: Oecd, 9–15.Google Scholar
  17. Veenhoven, R. (2001): Why Social Policy Needs Subjective Social Indicators. Wzb Working Papers Fs Iii 01 — 404, Berlin: Wzb.Google Scholar
  18. Wendt, C. (2003): Krankenversicherung oder Gesundheitsversorgung? Gesundheitssysteme im Vergleich, Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
  19. Zapf, W. (1984): Individuelle Wohlfahrt: Lebensbedingungen und wahrgenommene Lebensqualität. W. Glatzer & W. Zapf (eds.): Lebensqualität in der Bundesrepublik, Frankfurt/Main: Campus, 13–26.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jürgen Kohl
    • 1
  • Claus Wendt
    • 2
  1. 1.University of HeidelbergGermany
  2. 2.University of BremenGermany

Personalised recommendations