Biodeterioration of Prehistoric Rock Art and Issues in Site Preservation

  • Alice M. Tratebas

Abstract

Lichens, algae and mosses growing on prehistoric rock art pose a major worldwide threat for its preservation and conservation. Most rock art is surficial, as paintings, or shallowly pecked or incised into the rock surface. Breakdown of the rock surface by lichens and other microflora can easily erase these images. Lichens and other damaging flora inhabit a wide variety of environments and have destroyed entire panels of rock art. Methods of lichen control developed for buildings and large historic monuments may be inappropriate for more delicate rock art. Rock art researchers must consider conservation, research and ethical issues for site preservation where biodeterioration is a factor.

Keywords

Biomass Zinc Sponge Dolomite Holocene 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anati, E. (1964) Camonica Valley. (Translated by L. Asher ). Jonathan Cape, London.Google Scholar
  2. Anati, E. (1977) Methods of Recording and Analysing Rock Engravings. Studi Camuni, Volume 7. ( Translated by L. Diamond and R. Lawson). Edizioni del Centro, Capo di Ponte.Google Scholar
  3. Andersson, T. (1986) Preservation and Restoration of Rock Carvings and Rune-Stones. In: Case Studies in the Conservation of Stone and Wall Paintings ( N. S. Brommelle and P. Smith, ed.): 133–137. International Institute for Conservation of Historic and Artistic Works, London.Google Scholar
  4. Bahn, P. G., Bednarik, R. G. and Steinbring, J. (1995) The Peterborough Petroglyph site: reflections on massive intervention in rock art. Rock Art Research 12: 29–41.Google Scholar
  5. Bahn, P. G., Bednarik, R. G. and Steinbring, J. (1996) Peer review of massive intervention in rock art management practice. Rock Art Research 13: 54–60.Google Scholar
  6. Bahn, P. G., Bednarik, R. G. and Steinbring, J. (1997) Hear nothing, see nothing, say nothing? Rock Art Research 14: 55–58.Google Scholar
  7. Bahn, P. G. and Hygen, A.-S. (1996) More on massive intervention: the Aspeberget structure.Rock Art Research 13: 137–138.Google Scholar
  8. Beck, C., ed. (1994) Dating in Exposed and Surface Contexts. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
  9. Bednarik, R. G. (2000) Lichenometry and rock art. RockArt Research 17: 133–135.Google Scholar
  10. Bednarik, R. G. (2003) Biological deterioration. http://mc2.vicnet.au/home/conserv/web/allbio.html.
  11. Benedict, J. B. (1967) Recent glacial history of an alpine area in the Colorado Front Range U.S.A. I. Establishing a lichen-growth curve. Journal of Glaciology 6: 817–832.Google Scholar
  12. Beschel, R. E. (1961) Dating rock surfaces by lichen growth and its application to glaciology and physiography (Lichenometry). In: Geology of the Arctic ( G. O. Faasch, ed.): 1044–1062. University of Toronto Press, Toronto.Google Scholar
  13. Boustead, W. M. (1970) Museum conservation of anthropological material. In: Aboriginal Antiquities in Australia (F. D. McCarthy, ed.): 127–134. Australian Aboriginal Studies no. 22, AIAS, Canberra.Google Scholar
  14. Bricker, F., Holcomb, T. and Dean, J. C. (1999) A native American’s thoughts on the preservation and conservation of rock art. In: Images Past, Images Present: The Conservation and Preservation of Rock Art (J. C. Dean, ed.): 7–10. IRAC Proceedings, Volume 2. American Rock Art Research Association, Tucson.Google Scholar
  15. Brunet, J. and Vidal, P. (1980) Les oeuvres rupestres préhistoriques: étude des problèmes de conservation. Studies in Conservation 25: 97–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bull, W. B. and Brandon, M. T. (1998) Lichen dating of earthquake-generated regional rockfall events, Southern Alps, New Zealand. Geological Society of America Bulletin 110: 60–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bullen, M. (1996) Who’s right? Whose right? RockArt Research 13: 47–48.Google Scholar
  18. Childers, B. B. (1994) Long-term lichen-removal experiments and petroglyph conservation: Fremont County, Wyoming, Ranch Petroglyph Site. Rock Art Research 11: 101–112.Google Scholar
  19. Clarke, J. (1976) Lichen control experiment at an aboriginal rock engraving site, Bolgart, Western Australia. ICCMBulletin 2 (3): 15–17.Google Scholar
  20. Clones, J. (2001) Paleolithic Europe. In: Handbook of Rock Art Research ( D. S. Whitley, ed.): 459–481. AltaMira Press, Walnut Creek, California.Google Scholar
  21. Cremaschi, M. (1996) The rock varnish in the Messak Settafet (Fezzan, Libyan Sahara), age, archaeological context, and paleo-environmental implication. Geoarchaeology 11: 393421Google Scholar
  22. Crotty, H. K., ed. (1989) Preserving Our Rock Art Heritage. American Rock Art Research Association, Occasional Paper 1. San Miguel, California.Google Scholar
  23. Dandridge, D. E. (2001) The Degradation of Rock Art by Lichen. Paper presented at the 66th Annual Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, New Orleans.Google Scholar
  24. Dandridge, D. E. and Meen, J.K. (2003) The degradation effects of rock art by lichen processes. American Indian Rock Art 29: 43–52.Google Scholar
  25. Danin, A. (1985) Palaeoclimates in Israel: Evidence from Weathering Patterns of Stones in and near Archaeological Sites. Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research 259: 33–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Danin, A., R. Gerson, K. Marton, and J. Garty. (1982) Patterns of Limestone and Dolomite Weathering by Lichens and Bluegreen Algae and Their Palaeoclimatic Significance. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 37: 221–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Del Monte, M., Sabbioni, C. and Zappia, G. (1987) The origin of calcium oxalates on historical buildings, monuments and natural outcrops. The Science of the Total Environment 67: 17–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Dorn, R. I. (1994) Dating petroglyphs with a three-tier rock varnish approach. In: New Light on Old Art (D. S. Whitley and L. L. Loendorf, eds.): 13–36. Institute of Archaeology Monograph no. 36. University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  29. Dorn, R. I. (1998) Rock Coatings. Elsevier, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  30. Dorn, R. I. (2001) Chronometric techniques: engravings. In: Handbook of Rock Art Research ( D. S. Whitley, ed.): 167–189. AltaMira Press, Walnut Creek, California.Google Scholar
  31. Dorn, R. I. (2003) Second Preliminary Report: Initial Results. Report for contract KAP030013, on file at Bureau of Land Management, Newcastle Field Office, Newcastle, Wyoming.Google Scholar
  32. Dorn, R. I. and DeNiro, M. J. (1985) Stable carbon isotope ratios of rock varnish organic matter: a new paleoenvironmental indicator. Science 227: 1472–1474.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Fernandez, P. L., Gutierrez, I., Quindós, L. S., Soto, J. and Villar, E. (1986) Natural ventilation of the paintings room in the Altamira Cave. Nature 321: 586–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Fleisher, M., Liu, T. and Broecker, W. S. (1999) A clue regarding the origin of rock varnish. Geophysical Research Letters 26: 103–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Florian, M. L. E. (1978) A review: the lichen role in rock art - dating, deterioration and control. In: Conservation of Rock Art (C. Pearson, ed.): 95–98. Proceedings of the International Workshop on the Conservation of Rock Art, Perth, September 1977. Institute for the Conservation of Cultural Materials.Google Scholar
  36. Gob, F., F. Petit, J. -P. Bravard, A. Ozer, and A. Gob. (2003) Lichenometric Application to Historical and Subrecent Dynamics and Sediment Transport of a Corsican Stream (Figarella River—France). Quaternary Science Reviews 22: 2111–2124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Grisafe, D. A. (1996) Preserving native American petroglyphs on porous sandstone. Plains Anthropologist 41: 373–382.Google Scholar
  38. Grisafe, D. A. (2000) Improvement of sandstone durability: evaluating a treatment’s suitability for preserving historic inscriptions. Technology and Conservation, Spring 1999–2000: 20–26.Google Scholar
  39. Hale, M. E. (1975) Control of Biological Growths on Mayan Archeological Ruins in Guatemala and Honduras. National Geographic Society Research Reports, 1975 Projects: 305–321.Google Scholar
  40. Haskovec. I. P. (1991) On some non-technical issues of conservation. In: Rock Art and Posterity: Conserving, Managing and Recording Rock Art (C. Pearson and B. K. Swartz, eds.): 97–99. Occasional AURA Publication No. 4. Australian Rock Art Research Association, Melbourne.Google Scholar
  41. Henderson, J. W. (1995) An improved procedure for the photographic enhancement of rockpaintings. Rock Art Research 12 (2): 75–85.Google Scholar
  42. Hygen, A.-S. (1999) Preservation problems concerning rock art in the County of 1 stfold, South-East Norway. In NEWS95—International Rock Art Congress Proceedings (Dario Seglie, ed.). [Html-CD ROM edition.] Centro Studi e Museo D’Arte Preistorica, Pinerolo, Italy.Google Scholar
  43. Jaffe, L. (1996) Systematic vandalism and improper conduct in the Côa Valley Rock Art Area. AURA Newsletter 13 (2): 12–13.Google Scholar
  44. Jones, D. (1988) Lichens and pedogenesis. In: Handbook of Lichenology, Volume III. ( M. Galun, ed.): 109–124. CRC Press, Boca Raton.Google Scholar
  45. Jones, D., and Wilson, M. J. (1985) Chemical activity of lichens on mineral surfaces: a review. International Biodeterioration 21: 99–104.Google Scholar
  46. Jones, D., Wilson, M.J. and McHardy, W. J. (1981) Lichen weathering of rock-forming minerals: application of scanning electron microscopy and microprobe analysis. Journal of Microscopy 124: 95–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kaluarachchi, W., Labadie, J. H. and Russ, J. (1995) A close look at the rock art of Amistad National Recreation Area, Texas. Park Science 15 (4): 15–17.Google Scholar
  48. Kennedy, B. (1979) Initial attempts at conservation work at rock art sites in British Columbia British Columbia Provincial Museum Heritage Record 8: 285–292.Google Scholar
  49. Kessler, D. W. (1923) Exposure Tests on Colorless Waterproofing Materials. Technologic Papers of the Bureau of Standards 18: 1–33. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  50. Kumar, R. and Kumar, A.V. (1999) Biodeterioration of Stone in Tropical Environments: an overview. The Getty Conservation Institute, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  51. Kurz, M. D. and Brook, E. J. ( 1994 Surface exposure dating with cosmogenic nuclides. In: Dating in Exposed and Surface Contexts ( C. Beck, ed.): 139–159. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
  52. Lal, B. B. (1970) Indian rock paintings and their preservation. In: Aboriginal Antiquities in Australia (F. D. McCarthy, ed.): 139–146. Australian Aboriginal Studies No. 22, AIAS, Canberra.Google Scholar
  53. Lambert, D. (1989) Conserving Australian Rock Art: A Manual for Site Managers. Aboriginal Studies Press, Canberra.Google Scholar
  54. Lee, G. (1991) Rock Art and Cultural Resource Management. Wormwood Press, Calabasas, California.Google Scholar
  55. Levendosky, C. (2001) Oil drilling threatens sacred sites. The Charlotte Observer, 27 August 2001.Google Scholar
  56. Lefèvre, M. (1974) La ‘Maladie Verte’ de Lascaux. Studies in Conservation 19: 126–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Lim, I. L. (1999) Rock art as cultural heritage: strategies for administration. In: Images Past, Images Present: The Conservation and Preservation of Rock Art (J. C. Dean, ed.): 11–20. IRAC Proceedings, Volume 2. American Rock Art Research Association, Tucson.Google Scholar
  58. Liu, T. (2003) Blind testing of rock varnish microstratigraphy as a chronometric indicator: results on Late Quaternary lava flows in the Mojave Desert, California. Geomorphology 53: 209–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Liu, T., and Broeker, W. S. (2000) How fast does varnish grow? Geology 28: 183–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Liu, T., Broeker, W. S., Bell, J. W. and Mandeville, C. W. (2000) Terminal Pleistocene wet event recorded in rock varnish from Las Vegas Valley, Southern Nevada. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 161: 423–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Liu, T. and Dorn, R. I. (1996) Understanding the spatial variability of environmental change in drylands with rock varnish microlaminations. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 86: 187–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Lock, W. W., J. T. Andrews, and P. J. Webber. (1979) Manual for Lichenometry. British Geomorphological Research Group, Technical Bulletin 26: 1–47.Google Scholar
  63. Mark, R. and Billo, E. (2002) Application of digital image enhancement in rock art recording. American Indian Rock Art 28: 121–128.Google Scholar
  64. Marston, R. A. (2003) Editorial Note. Geomorphology 53: 197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Martin, A. K. and Johnson, G. C. (1992) Chemical control of lichen growths established on building materials: a compilation of the published literature. Biodeterioration Abstracts 6: 101–117.Google Scholar
  66. Matthews, J. A. (1994) Lichenometric Dating: A Review with Particular Reference to ‘Little Ice Age’ Moraines in Southern Norway. In Dating in Exposed and Surface Contexts, edited by C. Beck, pp. 185–212. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
  67. McCarthy, D. P, and K. Zaniewski. (2001) Digital Analysis of Lichen Cover: A Technique for Use in Lichenometry and Licheonology. Arctic, Antarctic, and Alpine Research 33: 107–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Meehan, B. (1995) Aboriginal views of the management of rock art sites in Australia. In: Perceiving Rock Art: Social and Political Perspectives ( K. Helskog and B. Olsen, ed.): 295–316. Institute for Comparative Research in Human Culture, Oslo.Google Scholar
  69. Mowaljarlai, D. and Watchman, A. ( 1989 An aboriginal view of rock art management. Rock Art Research 6: 151–153.Google Scholar
  70. Oliver, A. (2002) The variable performance of ethyl silicate: consolidated stone at Three National Parks. Association, for Preservation Technology Bulletin 33 (2–3): 39–44.Google Scholar
  71. Padgett, A. and Barthuli, K. (1995) Paso por Aqui: a history of site management at El Mono National Monument, New Mexico, U.S.A. In: Management of Rock Art Imagery (G. Ward and L. Ward, ed.): 26–33. Occasional AURA Publication No. 6, Australian Rock Art Research Association, Melbourne.Google Scholar
  72. Phillips, F. M., Flynch, M. Elmore, D. and Sharma, P. (1997) Maximum ages for the Côa Valley (Portugal) engravings measured with 36C1. Antiquity 71: 100–104.Google Scholar
  73. Rebricova, N. L. and Ageeva, E. N. (1995) An evaluation of biocide treatments on the rock art of Baical. In: Methods of Evaluating Products for the Conservation of Porous Building Materials in Monuments, pp. 69–74. Preprints of the International Colloquium, Rome, 1921 June 1995. ICCROM.Google Scholar
  74. Roach, L. (2004) Personal communicationGoogle Scholar
  75. Rosenfeld, A. (1988) Rock Art Conservation in Australia. Special Australian HeritageGoogle Scholar
  76. Publication Series No. 2. 2nd ed. Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra. Rowe, M. W. (200la) Dating by AMS radiocarbon analysis. In: Handbook of Rock ArtResearch (D. S. Whitley, ed.): 139–166. AltaMira Press, Walnut Creek, California.Google Scholar
  77. Rowe, M. W. (2001b) Physical and chemical analysis. In: Handbook of Rock Art Research ( D. S. Whitley, ed.): 190–220. AltaMira Press, Walnut Creek, California.Google Scholar
  78. Russ, J., Kaluarachchi, W. D., Drummond, L. and Edwards, H. G. M. (1999) The nature of a whewellite-rich rock crust associated with pictographs in Southwestern Texas. Studies in Conservation 44: 91–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Russ, J., Palma, R. L., Loyd, D. H., Bouttton, T. W. and Coy, M. A. (1996) Origin of the whewellite-rich rock crust in the Lower Pecos Region of Southwest Texas and its significance to paleoclimate reconstructions. Quaternary Research 46: 27–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Russ, J., Palma, R. L., Loyd, D. H., Farwell, D. W. and Edwards, H. G. M. (1995) Analysis of the rock accretions in the Lower Pecos Region of Southwest Texas. Geoarchaeology 10: 43–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Sancho, L. G., D. Palacios, J. de Marcos, and F. Valladares. (2001) Geomorphological Significance of Lichen Colonization in a Present Snow Hollow: Hoya del Cuchillar de las Navajas, Sierra de Gredos (Spain). Catena 43: 323–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Seaward, M. R. D. (1997) Major impacts made by lichens in biodeterioration processes. International Biodeterioration and Biodegradation 40: 269–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Silver, C. (1989) Rock art conservation in the United States: wish or reality. In: Preserving Our Rock Art Heritage (H. K. Crotty, ed.): 3–15. American Rock Art Research Association, Occasional Paper 1. San Miguel, California.Google Scholar
  84. Silver, C. (2002) Research on Lichen-Induced Deterioration of Rock Art and Prospects for Conservation Treatment. Draft report for contract DACA63–99-P-1250. Report on file, U. S Bureau of Land Management, Newcastle Field Office, Newcastle, Wyoming.Google Scholar
  85. Solomina, O, and P. E. Calkin. (2003) Lichenometry Applied to Moraines in Alaska, U.S.A., and Kamchatka, Russia. Arctic, Antaractic, and Alpine Research 35: 129–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Somavilla, J. F., Khayyat, N. and Arroyo, V. (1978) A comparative study of the microorganisms present in the Altamira and La Pasiega Caves. International Biodeterioration Bulletin 14 (4): 103–109.Google Scholar
  87. St. Clair, L. (2000) Report Concerning Lichen Encroachment on Petroglyph Panels. Preliminaryreport for contract number DACA63–99-P-1250. Report on file, U. S. Bureau of Land Management, Newcastle Field Office, Newcastle, Wyoming.Google Scholar
  88. Swartz, B. K. (1997a) An evaluation of rock art conservation practices at Foz Côa, Northern Portugal. Rock Art Research 14: 73–75.Google Scholar
  89. Swartz, B. K. (1997b) An investigation of the Portuguese government policies on the management of the Foz Côa sites. Rock Art Research 14: 75–76.Google Scholar
  90. Syers, J. K. and Iskandar, I. K. (1973) Pedogenic significance of lichens. In: The Lichens V. Ahmadjian and M. E. Hale, eds. 225–248. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  91. Taylor, J. M., Bokman, W. and Wainwright, I. N. M. (1977) Rock art conservation: some realities and practical considerations. In: CRARA 77, Papers from the Fourth Biennial Conference of the Canadian Rock Art Research Associates (D. Lundy, ed.): 293–324.Google Scholar
  92. Thorne, C. (2002) House bill seeks to protect sacred Indian sites. San Francisco Chronicle, 18 July 2002.Google Scholar
  93. Tratebas, A. M. (1993) Stylistic chronology versus absolute dates for early hunting style rock art on the North American Plains. In: Rock Art Studies: the Post-Stylistic Era (M. Lorblanchet and P. Bahn, eds.): 163–177. Oxbow Monograph 35, Oxbow Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  94. Tratebas, A. M. and Chapman, F. (1996) Ethical and conservation issues in removing lichens from petroglyphs. Rock Art Research 13: 129–133.Google Scholar
  95. Wainwright, I. N. M. (1985) Rock art conservation research in Canada. Bollettino del Centro Camuno di Studi Preistorici 22: 15–46.Google Scholar
  96. Wainwright, I. N. M. (1986) Lichen removal from an engraved memorial to Walt Whitman. Association for Preservation Technology Bulletin 18 (4): 46–51.Google Scholar
  97. Wainwright, I. N. M. (1996) Structure protects rock art. Rock Art Research 13: 52–53.Google Scholar
  98. Walderhaug, O. and Walderhaug, E. M. (1998) Weathering of Norwegian rock art–a critical review. Norwegian Archaeological Review 31: 119–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Watchman, A. (1993a) Perspectives and potentials for absolute dating prehistoric rock paintings. Antiquity 67: 58–65.Google Scholar
  100. Watchman, A. (1993b) Evidence of a 25,000-year-old pictograph in Northern Australia. Geoarchaeology 8: 465–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Watchman, A. and Cole, N. (1993) Accelerator radiocarbon dating of plant-fibre binders in rock paintings from Northeastern Australia. Antiquity 67: 355–358.Google Scholar
  102. Weeks, R. (2003) Discovering Monongahela Rock-Art: The Ancient Teaching Rocks of the Upper Ohio Valley. Paper presented at the 68th Annual Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.Google Scholar
  103. Winchester, V., and R. K. Chaujar. (2002) Lichenometric Dating of Slope Movements, Nant Ffrancon, North Wales. Geomorphology 47: 61–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Young, G. S. and Wainwright, I. N. M. 1995. The control of algal biodeterioration of a marble petroglyph site. Studies in Conservation 40: 82–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Young, M. J. (1988) Signs from the Ancestors: Zuni Cultural Symbolism and Perceptions of Rock Art. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alice M. Tratebas
    • 1
  1. 1.Bureau of Land ManagementNewcastleUSA

Personalised recommendations