Skip to main content

Personal Givenness and Cultural a prioris

  • Chapter
Space, Time, and Culture

Part of the book series: Contributions to Phenomenology ((CTPH,volume 51))

Abstract

The problem addressed in this paper concerns the constitution of culture as intercultural experience. More precisely, it concerns how, in the face of today’s emphases on intercultural relations, which are captured by the postmodern catchphrase, “multiculturalism,” is it not only possible but necessary to describe the nexus of interpersonal relations in a way that is decisive and yet not definitive.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. See Jürgen Habermans, Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns Vols. 1 and 2 ( Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp, 1987 ).

    Google Scholar 

  2. See Alasdair MacIntyre, Whose Justice? Which Rationality? ( Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1988 ).

    Google Scholar 

  3. See my “Temporality and the Point: The Origins and Crisis of Continental Philosophy,” in Self-Awareness, Temporality, and Alterity: Central Topics in Phenomenology, ed. Dan Zahavi (Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1998), 151– 167. And my “Totalitarianism, Homogeneity of Power, Depth: Towards a Socio-Political Ontology,” Tijdschrift voor Filosofie 51/4 (December 1989): 621–648.

    Google Scholar 

  4. And not necessarily the “subject,” “transcendence,” the Other, etc. See Edmund Husserl, Die Idee der Phänomenologie, ed. Walter Biemel, Hua II (The Hague: Nijhoff, 1958). And Edmund Husserl, Erste Philosophie, ed. Rudolf Boehm, Hua VIII (The Hague: Nijhoff, 1959). See a similar point made by Jean-Luc Marion, Étant donné: Essai d’une phénoménologie de la donation (Paris: PUF, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  5. See my “Limit-Phenomena and the Liminality of Experience,” Alter: revue de phénoménologie 6 (1998): 275–296.

    Google Scholar 

  6. See A. R. Luther, Persons in Love (The Hague: Nijhoff, 1972); hereafter cited as Persons.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Max Scheler, Wesen und Formen der Sympathie (Gesammelte Werke, Vol. 7), ed. Manfred Frings (Bern: Francke, 1973), 164, 191; hereafter cited as Sympathie. English translation, The Nature of Sympathy, trans. Peter Heath (Hamden, CT: Archon Books, 1970), 165, 192; hereafter cited as Sympathy.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Max Scheler, Formalismus in der Ethik und die Materiale Wertethik, (Gesammelte Werke Vol. 2), ed. Maria Scheler (Bern: Francke, 1966), 482; hereafter cited as Formalismus. English translation, Max Scheler, Formalism in Ethics and Non-Formal Ethics of Value, trans. Manfred S. Frings and Roger L. Funk (Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1973), 490; hereafter cited as Formalism. See Martin Buber, “Ich und Du,” in Das dialogische Prinzip ( Heidelberg: Lambert Schneider, 1965 ), 112.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Max Scheler, “Ordo Amoris,” in Schriften aus dem Nachlaß,Vol 1, (Gesammelte Werke, Vol. 10) ed. Maria Scheler (Bern: Francke, 1957), 347; hereafter cited as Schriften. English translation, Max Scheler, “Ordo Amoris,” in Selected Philosophical Essays, trans. David R. Lachterman (Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1973) 98–99; hereafter cited as Essays. And see Formalismus, op. cit., 312 f.; Formalism, op. cit., 308 f.

    Google Scholar 

  10. See my “Interpersonal Attention through Exemplarity,” Journal of Consciousness Studies: Beyond Ourselves, ed., Evan Thompson (2001): 179–196. See Scheler, Schriften, op. cit., 348; Essays, op. cit., 100.

    Google Scholar 

  11. See for example, Formalismus, op. cit., 512; Formalism, op. cit., 523.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fyodor Dostovesky’s The Brother’s Karamazov, trans. Richard Pevear and Larissa Volokhonsky (New York: Vintage Books, 1991), 57.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Funktionalisierung der Weseneinsicht.” See Max Scheler, Vom Ewigen im Menschen, ed. Maria Scheler (Bern: Francke, 1954), 198; hereafter cited as Vom Ewigen.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

David Carr Cheung Chan-Fai

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Steinbock, A. (2004). Personal Givenness and Cultural a prioris. In: Carr, D., Chan-Fai, C. (eds) Space, Time, and Culture. Contributions to Phenomenology, vol 51. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-2824-3_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-2824-3_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-6727-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-2824-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics