Abstract
I defend logical pluralism against the charge that One True Logic is motivated by considerations of warrant transfer. On the way I attempt to clarify just a little the connections between deductive validity and epistemology.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Anderson, Alan Ross and Nuel D. Belnap: 1975, Entailment: The Logic of Relevance and Necessity, Vol. 1, Princeton, Princeton University Press.
Anderson, Alan Ross, Nuel D. Belnap and J. Michael Dunn: 1992, Entailment: The Logic of Relevance and Necessity, Vol 2, Princeton, Princeton University Press.
Beall, JC and Greg Restall: 2000, ‘Logical Pluralism’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 78, 475– 493.
Beall, JC and Greg Restall: 2001, ‘Defending Logical Pluralism’, in Bryson Brown and John Woods (eds.), Logical Consequence: Rival Approaches. Proceedings of the 1999 Conference of the Society of Exact Philosophy, Stanmore, Hermes, pp. 1–22.
Belnap, Nuel D. and J. Michael Dunn: 1981, ‘Entailment and the Disjunctive Syllogism’, in F. Fløi-stad and G. H. von Wright (eds.), Philosophy of Language/Philosophical Logic, The Hague, Martinus Nijhoff, pp. 337–366. Reprinted as Section 80 in Entailment Volume 2, Anderson et al. (1992).
Dunn, J. Michael: 1986, ‘Relevance Logic and Entailment’, in Dov M. Gabbay and Franz Günthner (eds.), Handbook of Philosophical Logic, Vol. 3, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 117–229
Lewic, David: 1982, ‘Logic for Equivocators’, Noûs 16, 431–441.
Prawitz, Dag: 1965, Natural Deduction: A Proof Theoretical Study, stockholm, Almqvist and Wiksell.
van Orman Quine, Willard: 1970, Philosophy of Logic, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice-Hall.
Read, Stephen: 1988, Relevant Logic, Oxford, Basil Blackwell.
Restall, Greg: 1999, ‘Ways Things Can't Be', Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 39, 583–596.
Restall, Greg: 1999, ‘Negation in Relevant Logics: How I Stopped Worrying and Learned to Love the Routley Star’, in Dov Gabbay and Heinrich Wansing (eds.), What is Negation?, Vol. 13 of Applied Logic Series, Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 53–76.
Restal, Greg: 2002, ‘Carnap’s Tolerance, Meaning and Logical Pluralism’, Journal of Philosophy 99, 426–443.
Wiles, Andrew: 1995, ‘Modular elliptic curves and Fermat’s Last Theorem’, Ann. Math. 141, 443– 551.
Wiles, Andrew and Richard Taylor: 1995, ‘Ring-theoretic Properties of Certain Hecke Algebras’, Ann. Math. 141, 553–572.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Restall, G. (2009). Logical Pluralism and the Preservation of Warrant. In: Rahman, S., Symons, J., Gabbay, D.M., Bendegem, J.P.v. (eds) Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science. Logic, Epistemology, And The Unity Of Science, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-2808-3_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-2808-3_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-2486-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-2808-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive