Advertisement

Morality and Selfhood

Contributions from Moral Psychology
  • Karl Hennig
Part of the International Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine book series (LIME, volume 21)

Abstract

The nature of the moral domain remains implicit in our pre-theoretical judgments and valuations regarding what is right and wrong, good and bad across a wide range of situations. These, however, are admittedly idiosyncratic and biased, conditioned as they are by our upbringing, social practices, and traditions in which we have been raised. The ancient philosopher Aristotle (1962) reminds us that while the character of an individual or society is the result of the encouragement or suppression of certain habits; conversely, character determines what habits are regarded as worth inculcating. Character is an organ of perception where to see the good, one first has to be good. The ancient philosopher Plato provides the now paradigmatic example. Despite Socrates’ best efforts to be reasonable, the tyrant Callicles remains unconvinced. His malformed character distorts his perception—calling fair, foul and foul, fair (Plato, 1971).

Keywords

Moral Judgment Moral Reasoning Moral Development Moral Psychology Moral Domain 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., Text Revision). Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  2. Arendt, Hannah (1977). Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil. New York: Pengu in Books.Google Scholar
  3. Aristotle. (1962). Nichomachean Ethics [translated by M. Ostwald]. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  4. Bandura, A. (1991). Social cognitive theory of moral thought and action. In W. M. Kurtines and J. L. Gewirtz (Eds.), Handbook of moral behavior and development (Vol. 1: Theory). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  5. Baron, M. (1991). Impartiality and friendship. Ethics, 101, 836 - 857.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baumeister, R. F., and Sommer, K. L. (1997). What do men want? Gender differences and two spheres of belongingness: Comment on Cross and Madson (1997). Psychological Bulletin, 122, 5 - 37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bell, D. (1976). The cultural contradictions of capitalism. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  8. Bigelow, A. E. (2001). Discovering the self though other: Infant’s preference for social contingency. Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic (Special Issue), 65, 335 - 346.Google Scholar
  9. Blasi, A. (1984). Moral identity: Its role in moral functioning. In W. M. Kurtines and J. L. Gewirtz (Eds.), Morality, moral behavior, and moral development (pp. 128 - 139 ). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  10. Boling, P. (1991). The democratic potential of mothering. Political Theory, 19, 606 - 625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Broverman, D. M., Clarkson, F., and Rosenkrantz, P. S. (1972). Sex role stereotypes: A current appraisal. Journal of Social Issues, 28, 59 - 78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brown, R., and Hernstein, R. J. (1975). Psychology. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  13. Chodorow, N. (1978). The reproduction of mothering. Berkley: University of California Press. Cottingham, J. (1983). Ethics and partiality. Philosophical Studies, 43, 83 - 99.Google Scholar
  14. Cottingham, J. (1991). The ethics of self-concern. Ethics, 101, 798 - 817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Clancy, S. M., and Dollinger, S. J. (1993). Photographic depictions of the self: Gender and age differences in social connectedness. Sex Roles, 29, 477 - 495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Colby, A., and Damon, W. (1992). Some do care: Contemporary lives of moral commitment. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  17. Colby, A., and Kohlberg, L. (1987). The measurement of moral judgment (Vol. 2 ). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Cross, S. E., and Madson, L. (1997). Models of the self: Self-construals and gender. Psychological Bulletin, 122, 38 - 44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cross, S. E., Morris, M. L., and Gore, J. S. (2002). Thinking about oneself and others: The relational-interdependent self-construal and social cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 399 - 418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Descartes, René (1955). Discourse on the Method. In Philosophical Works of Descartes, Vol. 1 [translated by E. Haldane and G. Ross]. New York: Dover. (Original published 1637 )Google Scholar
  21. Eccles, J. S., Wigfield, A., Flanagan, C., Miller, C., Reuman, D., and Yee, D. (1989). Self-concepts, domain values, and self-esteem: Relations and changes at early adolescence. Journal of Personality, 37, 283 - 310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Eisenberg, N., and Lennon, R. (1983). Sex differences in empathy and related capacities. Psychological Bulletin, 94, 100 - 131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fonagy, P., Gergely, G., Jurist, E. L., and Target, M. (2002). Affect regulation, mentalization, and the development of the self. New York: Other Press.Google Scholar
  24. Franco, F. (1997). The development of meaning in infancy: Early communication and social understanding. In S. Hala (Ed.), The development of social cognition (pp. 95 - 160 ). East Sussex, England: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  25. Gardner, H. (1985). The minds new science: A history of the cognitive revolution. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  26. Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Gilligan, C. ( 1986, Spring). [Letter to D. Baumrind]. Newsletter of the APA Division on Developmental Psychology, pp. 10 - 13.Google Scholar
  28. Gilligan, C., and Wiggans, G. (1986). The origins of morality in early childhood relationships. In C. Gilligan, J. V. Ward, and J. M. Taylor (Eds.), Mapping the moral domain: A contribution of women’s thinking to psychological theory and education (pp. 111 - 138 ). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Glover, J. (2000). Humanity: A moral history of the twentieth century. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Graham, T., and Ickes, W. (1997). When women’s intuition isn’t greater than men’s. In W. Ickes (Ed.), Empathic accuracy (pp. 117 - 143 ).Google Scholar
  31. Hall, J. A. (1984). Nonverbal sex differences: Communication accuracy and expressive style. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Hall, J. A. (1987). On explaining gender differences: The case of nonverbal communication. In P. Shaver and C. Hendrick (Eds.), Review of personality and social psychology: Sex and gender (Vol. 7, pp. 177 - 200 ). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  33. Hare-Mustin, R. T., and Marecek, J. (1988). The meaning of difference: Gender theory, postmodernism, and psychology. American Psychologist, 43, 455 - 464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hennig, K. (in press). Care gone awry: The role of attachment and reflective functioning. In Thorkildsen, T. A., Manning, J., and Walberg, H. J. (Eds.), Nurturing morality. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  35. Josephs, R. A., Markus, H. R., and Tafarodi, R. W. (1992). Gender and self-esteem. Journal ofPersonality and Social Psychology, 63, 391 - 402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kant, I. (1964). Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals [translated by trans. H. J. Paton]. New York: Harper and Row. (Original published in 1785 )Google Scholar
  37. Kekes, J. (1989). Moral tradition and individuality. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Klemperer, V. (1998). I Will Bear Witness: A diary of the Nazi years [translated by Martin Chalmers]. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  39. Kohlberg L., and Armon, C. (1984). Three models for the study of adult development. In M. Commons, F. Richards, and C. Armon (Eds.), Beyond formal operations: Late adolescent and adult cognitive development (pp. 383 - 394 ). New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  40. Kohlberg, L. (1971). From Is to Ought: How to commit the naturalistic fallacy and get away with it in the study of moral development. In T. Mischel (Ed.), Cognitive development and epistemology (pp. 151 - 235 ). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  41. Kohlberg, L. (1981). Essays on moral development: Vol. 1. The philosophy of moral development. San Francisco: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  42. Kohlberg, L. (1984). Essays on moral development: Vol. 2. The psychology of moral development. San Francisco: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  43. Kohlberg, L. (1986). A current statement on some theoretical issues. In S. Modgil and C. Modgil (Eds.), Lawrence Kohlberg: Consensus and controversy (pp. 485 - 546 ). Philadelphia: Falmer.Google Scholar
  44. Krebs, D. L., Vermeulen, S. A., Carpendale, J. I., and Denton, K. (1991). Structural and situational influences on moral judgment: The interaction between stage and dilemma. In W. M. Kurtines and J. L Gewirtz (Eds.), Handbook of moral behavior and development: Research (Vol. 2, pp. 139 - 169 ). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  45. Langdale, C. J. (1996). A re-vision of structural-developmental theory. In G. L. Sapp (Ed.), Handbook of moral development: Models, processes, techniques, and research (pp. 15 - 54 ). Birmingham, AL: Religious Education Press.Google Scholar
  46. Lapsley, Daniel. 1992. Pluralism, Virtues, and the Post-Kohlbergian Era in Moral Psychology. In F. C. Power and D. Lapsley (Eds.), The Challenge of Pluralism: Education, Politics, and Values. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
  47. Lapsley, D. and Serlin, R. ( 1983, April). On the alleged degeneration of the Kohlbergian research program. Paper presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in child Development, Detroit.Google Scholar
  48. Lasch, C. (1979). The culture of narcissism. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  49. MacIntyre, A. (1981). After virtue: A study in moral theory. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
  50. Mackie, J. (1977). Ethics. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  51. McGuire, W. J., and McGuire, C. V. (1982). Significant others in self space: Sex differences and developmental trends in social self. In J. Suls (Ed.), Psychological perspectives on the self (Vol. 1, pp. 71 - 96 ). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  52. Mensch, J. (2003). Ethics and Selfhood: Alterity and the Phenomenology of Obligation. New York: SUNY PressGoogle Scholar
  53. Miller, J. B. (1986). Towards a new psychology of women. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  54. Montefiore, S. S. (2003). Stalin: The court of the Red Tsar. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson. Murdoch, I. (1970). The sovereignty of the good. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  55. Phillips, D.C. and Nicolayev, J. (1978) Kohlbergian moral development. A progressing or degenerating research programm? Educational theory, 28, 286 - 301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Plato. (1971). Gorgias [translated by W. Hamilton]. London: Pengu in Books.Google Scholar
  57. Pratt, M. W., Golding, G., Hunter, W., and Sampson, R. (1988). Sex differences in adult moral orientation. Human Development, 34, 61 - 80.Google Scholar
  58. Puka, M. L. (1991). Toward the redevelopment of Kohlberg’s theory: Presenting essential structure, removing controversial content. In W. M. Kurtines and J. L. Gewirtz (Eds.), Handbook of moral behavior and development (Vol. 1, pp. 373 - 394 ). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  59. Power, F. C., and Lapsley, D. K. (1992). Pluralism, virtues, and the post-Kohlbergian era in moralGoogle Scholar
  60. psychology. In F. C. Power and D. K. Lapsley (Eds.), Pluralism, virtues, and the post-Kohlbergian era in moral psychology (pp. 169-200). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  61. Rest, J. R. (1994). Background: Theory and research. In J. R. Rest (Ed.), Moral development in the professions. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  62. Rest, J. R., Narváez, D., Bebeau, M. J., and Thoma, S. J. (1999). Postconventional moral thinking: A neoKohlbergian approach. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  63. Sandel, M. (1982). Liberalism and the limits of justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  64. Sartre, J-P. (1948). Existentialism and humanism [translated by P. Mairet]. London: Methuen. (Original published 1946 )Google Scholar
  65. Singer, P. (1995). How are we to live: Ethics in an age of self-interest. Amherst, NY: Prometheus.Google Scholar
  66. Snodgras, S. (1992). Further effects of role versus gender on interpersonal sensitivity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 154 - 158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Sommers, C. H. (1986). Filial morality. The Journal of Philosophy, 83, 439 - 456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Taylor, C. (1989). Sources of the self: The making of the modern identity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  69. Walker, L. J. (1989). A longitudinal study of moral reasoning. Child Development, 60, 157 - 166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Walker, L. J. (1991). Sex differences in moral reasoning. In W. M. Kurtines and J. L. Gewirtz (Eds.), Handbook of moral behavior and development: Research (Vol. 2, pp. 333 - 364 ). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  71. Walker, L. J. (1995). Sexism in Kohlberg’s moral psychology? In W. M. Kurtines and J. L. Gewirtz (Eds.), Moral development: An introduction (pp. 83 - 107 ). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  72. Walker, L. J., de Vries, B., and Trevethan, S. D. (1987). Moral stages and moral orientations in real-life and hypothetical dilemmas. Child Development, 58, 842 - 858.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Walker, L. J., and Pitts, R. C. (1998). Naturalistic conceptions of moral maturity. Developmental Psychology, 34, 403 - 419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Walker, L. J., and Taylor, J. H. (1991). Stage transitions in moral reasoning: A longitudinal study of developmental processes. Developmental Psychology, 27, 330 - 337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Walker, L. J., and Hennig, K. H. (1997). Moral development in the broader context of personality. In S. Hala (Ed.), The development of social cognition (pp. 297 - 327 ). East Sussex, England: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  76. Walker, L. J., and Hennig, K. H. (in press). Differing Conceptions of Moral Exemplarity: Just, Brave, and Caring. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.Google Scholar
  77. Walker, L. J., Gustafson, P., and Hennig, K. H. (2001). The consolidation/transition model in moral reasoning development. Developmental Psychology, 37, 187 - 197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Walker, L. J., and Hennig, K. H. (2003). Differing Conceptions of Moral Exemplarity: Just, Brave, and Caring Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  79. Williams, B. (1981). Moral luck. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Karl Hennig

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations