Advertisement

Seventeenth-Century Theories of the Tides as a Gauge of Scientific Change

  • Wallace Hooper
Part of the Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science book series (BSPS, volume 239)

Abstract

What causes ocean water to rise and fall between high tide and low tide levels twice a day at sea ports and shorelines? Over the course of the seventeenth century, European natural philosophers began to believe that the “flux and reflux of the sea” could be a very meaningful physical phenomenon. Their interest was stirred by the debate over Copernicus and the idea that the earth rotated on its own axis and orbited around the sun. The unsolved problem of the cause of the tides proved to be productive subject matter for Copernican and anti-Copernican authors alike. It was most productive of all, perhaps, for Galileo Galilei and Isaac Newton.

Keywords

High Tide Tidal Cycle Tidal Period Rectilinear Motion Tidal Motion 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Palmieri, “Re-examining Galileo’s Theory.”Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Galilei, Dialogo [Gentile e.a. ] .Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Paolo Rossi has described, for example, the astrological works of Francesco Patrizi (1591), wherein the rise and fall of the masses of ocean water in tidal flux and reflux were attributed to the influence and influx of natural heat from the sun and moon, and likened to the rise of water boiling in a pot. Rossi, Aspetti della rivoluzione scientifica, pp.17o-171.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Stevin, Principal Works [Crone e.a.], III, p. 333. Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cf. Pannekoek’s Summary of the Work in ibid., p. 328. Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Copernicus, On the Revolutions [DobrzyckI e.a.], p. 15.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ibid., p. 15.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ibid., pp. 16–17.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ibid., p. II6. Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Drake, Galileo Studies, pp. 200–213. J. Renn, P. Damerow, S. Rieger, & D. Guilini have recently provided a much richer account of the discussions and collaborations between Galileo and Sarpi in the realm of mechanics and on the matter of the tides. See Renn e.a., “Hunting the White Elephant.”Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Quoted in ibid., p. 201.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ibid., pp. 201–202. Drake reports that paragraphs 569, 570, and 571, had earlier been published in Sarpi, Scritti. Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Galilei, Dialogue [Drake], pp. 427–428.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Galilei, Le Opere [Favaro], vol. 2, p. 198.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    There are many accounts and discussions of this exchange between Galileo and Kepler. Drake’s account may be found at Drake, Galileo at Work, pp. 40–42, for example.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gilbert, De Magnete [Fleury Mottelay].Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gilbert, De Magnete [Fleury Mottelay], pp. 34o-341.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ibid., p. 337.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ibid., p. 334.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kepler, Life and Letters [Baumgardt], pp. 43–45.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kepler, New Astronomy [Donahue], pp. 55–56.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kepler, Harmony of the World [Aition e.a. ] . Kepler’s remarks on the tides occur in Chapter Seven of Book Four, entitled “Epilogue on Sublunary Nature and on the Inferior Faculties of the Soul, Especially Those on which Astrology Depends.,Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Galileo, ”Discorso del Flusso e Reflusso del Mare;’ in Le Opere [ Favaro ] , v, pp. 377–395. An English translation of the Discorso is found in Finocchiaro (ed.), The Galileo Affair, pp. 119–133. Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Finocchiaro (ed.), The Galileo Affair, p. 120.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bacon, ”On the Ebb and Flow?’ The interested reader should also see Paolo Rossi’s discussion of Bacon and Galileo on the tides in Rossi, Aspetti della rivoluzione scientifica.ca. pp.151–222.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bacon, The New Organon [Anderson], bk. 2, aphorism 36, pp. 191–202, and aphorism 46, pp. 225–229.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Bacon, “On the Ebb and Flow,” p. 65.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ibid. pp. 67, 69.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ibid. p. 73.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ibid., pp. 73, 75, 77.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ibid., p. 87.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
  33. 33.
  34. 34.
  35. 35.
    Rossi, Aspetti della rivoluzione scientifica, pp. 151–222.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Quoted by Drake, Galileo at Work, p. 274. Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Bacon, The New Organon [Anderson], p. 227. Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Galilei, Dialogue [Drake], pp. 446–447.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Ibid., p. 448.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Ibid., pp. 417–418.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Drake’s note to this passage tells us this prelate was Marcantonio de Dominis, whose work was Euripus sive sententia de fluxu et refluxu maris (Roma, 1624).Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Drake’s note to this passage points out that this was the view of Galileo’s old professor of physics and medicine, Girolamo Borro, stated in Del Flusso e reflusso del mare e dell’inondatione del Nilo (Firenze, 1583).Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Galilei, Dialogue [Drake], pp. 419–420.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Ibid., p. 420.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Ibid., pp. 432–433. 46 Ibid., p. 442.Google Scholar
  46. 45.
    Ibid., pp. 432–433.Google Scholar
  47. 46.
    Ibid., p. 442.Google Scholar
  48. 47.
    Ibid., p. 444.Google Scholar
  49. 48.
    Ibid., pp. 445–446.Google Scholar
  50. 49.
    Ibid., p. 447Google Scholar
  51. 50.
    Ibid., pp. 452–453.Google Scholar
  52. 51.
    Gassendi, Opera omnia, II, pp. 27–33.Google Scholar
  53. 52.
    Wallis, “Letter on the Flux and Reflux.”Google Scholar
  54. 53.
    Ibid., p. 265.Google Scholar
  55. 54.
    Ibid., p. 268.Google Scholar
  56. 55.
  57. 56.
    Ibid., pp. 269–270.Google Scholar
  58. 57.
    Ibid., pp. 271–272.Google Scholar
  59. 58.
    Ibid., pp. 272–273.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wallace Hooper

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations