Abstract
Exploration with formal design systems comprises an iterative process of specifying problems, finding plausible and alternative solutions, judging the validity of solutions relative to problems and reformulating problems and solutions. Recent advances in formal generative design have developed the mathematics and algorithms to describe and perform conceptual design tasks. However, design remains a human enterprise: formalisms are part of a larger equation comprising human computer interaction. To support the user in designing with formal systems, shared representations that interleave initiative of the designer and the design formalism are necessary. The problem of devising representational structures in which initiative is sometimes taken by the designer and sometimes by a computer in working on a shared design task is reported in this paper. To address this problem, the requirements, representation and implementation of a shared interaction construct, the feature node, is described. The feature node facilitates the sharing of initiative in formulating and reformulating problems, generating solutions, making choices and navigating the history of exploration.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Burrow, AL and Woodbury R: 2001, Design spaces-The forgotten artefact, in M Burry, T Dawson, J Rollo, and S Datta (eds), Hand, Eye, Mind, Digital, Deakin University,Geelong, pp. 56–62.
Burrow, AL and Woodbury R: 1999, π-resolution and design space exploration, in G Augenbroe and C Eastman (eds), Computers in Building: Proceedings of the CAADF’99 Conference, Kluwer , pp. 291–308.
Chien, S and Flemming U: 1996, Design Space Navigation\ An Annotated Bibliography, Technical Report No EDRC 48–37-96, Engineering Design Research Center, CarnegieMellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Chien, S and Flemming U: 1997, Information navigation in generative design systems, in Y Liu, J Tsou, and J Hou (eds), CAADRIA 97, Vol. 2, Hsinchu, Taiwan, National Chia Tung University, pp. 355–366.
Datta, S and Woodbury R: 2002, A graphical notation for mixed-initiative dialogue with generative design systems in JS Gero (ed), Artificial Intelligence in Design ’02, Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 25–40.
Hybs, I and Gero JS: 1992, An evolutionary process model of design, Design Studies 13(3): 273–290.
Jacobson, I, Booch G, and Rumbaugh J: 1998, The Uniifiied Modeling Language User Guide, Reading, Addison Wesley, MA.
Leeuwen, JV and Wagter H: 1998, A features framework for architectural information: Dynamic models of design in JS Gero and F Sudweeks (eds), Artiifiicial Intelligence in Design ’98, Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 461–480
Rich, C and Sidner CL: 1998, COLLAGEN: A collaboration manager for software interface agents, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 8(3–4): 315–350.
Schon, DA and Wiggins G: 1992, Kinds of seeing and their functions in designing, Design Studies 13(2): 135–156.
Smithers, T: 2000, Designing a font to test a theory, in JS Gero (ed), Artificial Intelligence in Design ’00, Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 3–22.
Smithers, T: 2002, Synthesis in designing, in JS Gero (ed), Artificial Intelligence in Design ’02, Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 3–24.
Stouffs, R and Cumming M: 2003, Querying design information through the visual manipulation of representational structures, in ML Chiu, JY. Tsou, T Kvan, M Morozumi, and TS Jeng (eds), Digital Design: Research and Practice, Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 41–53.
Stouffs, R and Krishnamurti R: 2002, Representational flexibility for design, in JS Gero (ed), Artiifiicial Intelligence in Design ’02, Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 105–128.
Summers, J, Lacroix Z, and J Shah: 2002, Case-based design facilitated by the design exemplar, in JS Gero (ed), Artificial Intelligence in Design ’02, Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 453–476.
Veloso, MM, Mulvehill AM, and Cox MT: 1997, Rationale-supported mixed-initiative casebased planning, Innovative Applications of Artiifiicial Intelligence, Providence, RI, pp. 1072–1077.
Woodbury, R, Burrow A, Datta S, and Chang T: 1999, Typed feature structures and design space exploration, special issue on generative design systems, Artiifiicial Intelligence in Design, Manufacturing and Engineering 13(4): 287–302.
Woodbury, R, Datta S, and Burrow A: 2000, Erasure in design space exploration, in JS Gero (ed) Artiifiicial Intelligence in Design’00, Kluwer Academic Publishers pp. 521–544.
Woodbury, RF and Chang TW: 1995, Massing and enclosure design with SEED-Config., ASCE Journal of Architectural Engineering 1(4): 170–178.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2004 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this paper
Cite this paper
Datta, S., Woodbury, R.F. (2004). Feature Nodes: An Interaction Construct for Sharing Initiative in Design Exploration. In: Gero, J.S. (eds) Design Computing and Cognition ’04. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-2393-4_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-2393-4_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-6650-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-2393-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive