Forests and Management: A Case Study in Nepal Using Remote Sensing and GIS
The past decades have witnessed increasing awareness of forest degradation, with a concurrent rising interest in alternative methods of forest management. Among developing countries, Nepal has proved an enthusiastic leader in experimenting with participatory systems of forest governance (Agrawal et al. 1999). A careful look at the measures that Nepal has put into place, and analysis of their successes and limitations, will help enhance our understanding and ultimately facilitate implementation of effective forest policy.
KeywordsNormalize Difference Vegetation Index Forest Condition Community Forestry Normalize Difference Vegetation Index Image Forest Governance
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Agrawal, A., C. Britt, and K. Kanel. 1999. Decentralization in Nepal: A Comparative Analysis. Oakland, CA: ICS Press.Google Scholar
- Chakraborty, R. N. 2001. Stability and Outcomes of Common Property Institutions in Forestry: Evidence from the Terai Region of Nepal. Ecological Economics 34: 1–353.Google Scholar
- Nagendra, H. 2003. Tenure and Forest Conditions: Community Forestry in the Nepal Terai. Environmental Conservation, in press.Google Scholar
- Ostrom, E. 1998. The International Forestry Resources and Institutions Program: A Methodology for Relating Human Incentives and Actions on Forest Cover and Biodiversity. In F. Dallmeier and J. A. Comisker, eds. Forest Biodiversity in North, Central and South America, and the Caribbean: Research and Monitoring, Man and the Biosphere Series (Vol. 1: 1–28). Paris: UNESCO; New York: Parthenon.Google Scholar
- Schweik, C., H. Nagendra, and D. R. Sinha. 2003. Using Satellites to Search for Forest Management Innovations in Nepal. Ambio, in press.Google Scholar
- Strode, S. and F. Helles. 2000. Park-People Conflict in Royal Chitwan National Park, Nepal: Buying Time at High Cost? Environmental Conservation 27: 368–381.Google Scholar