Anthropogenic Soils and Sustainability in Amazonia

  • William I. Woods

Abstract

Despite its great biotic concentration and diversity, the Amazon Basin (Figure 46.1) has been seen as a region capable of supporting only a low population density based upon non-intensive subsistence activities and that all attempts at intensifying the area’s food production and increasing its sustainable populations are doomed to failure (e.g., Meggers 1996). However, questions have been raised about this traditional viewpoint and it has been proposed that complex societies with large, sedentary populations were present for at least a millennium before European contact (Heckenberger et al. 1999). It appears that early aboriginal cultivators had developed field management mechanisms that mimicked the processes long operant within habitation areas where basic soil properties were radically changed through the addition of ash and other organic materials (Hecht and Posey 1989). As a result, long after the decimation of these peoples during the early historic period, their enriched soils still are a major resource for agriculture in Amazonia (Glaser et al. 2001) and a proper understanding of these soils’ properties may provide a major resource for future populations (Mann 2002). Geographers, including William Denevan, Susanna Hecht, Joseph McCann, Nigel Smith, and William Woods, have played an integral part in the interdisciplinary research investigation of the anthropogenic soils.

Keywords

Combustion Maize Europe Charcoal Melon 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Denevan, W. M. 2001. Cultivated Landscapes of Native Amazonia and the Andes. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Glaser, B., L. Haumaier, G. Guggenberger, and W. Zech. 2001. The ‘Terra Preta’ Phenomenon: A Model for Sustainable Agriculture in the Humid Tropics. Naturwissenschaften 88: 37–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Hecht, S. B., and D. A. Posey. 1989. Preliminary Results on Soil Management Techniques of the Kayapó Indians. Advances in Economic Botany 7: 174–188.Google Scholar
  4. Heckenberger, M. J., J. B. Petersen, and E. G. Neves. 1999. Village Size and Permanence in Amazonia: Two Archaeological Examples from Brazil. Latin American Antiquity 10: 353–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Mann, C. C. 2002. The Real Dirt on Rainforest Fertility. Science 297: 920–923.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Meggers, B. J. 1996. Amazonia: Man and Culture in a Counterfeit Paradise, Revised edition. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press.Google Scholar
  7. Smith, H. H. 1879. Brazil: The Amazons and the Coast. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.Google Scholar
  8. Smith, N. J. H. 1980. Anthrosols and Human Carrying Capacity in Amazonia. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 70: 553–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Sombroek, W. G., D. C. Kern, T. Rodrigues, M. S. Cravo, T. Jarbas, W. I. Woods, and B. Glaser. 2002. Terra Preta and Terra Mulata: Pre-Columbian Amazon Kitchen Middens and Agricultural Fields, Their Sustainability, and Their Replication. Paper presented at The 17th World Congress of Soil Science, Bangkok, Thailand.Google Scholar
  10. Woods, W. I. and J. M. McCann. 1999. The Anthropogenic Origin and Persistence of Amazonian Dark Earths. The Yearbook of the Conference of Latin Americanist Geographers 25: 7–14.Google Scholar
  11. Woods, W. I. 1995. Comments on the Black Earths of Amazonia. In F. Andrew Schoolmaster, ed. Papers and Proceedings of the Applied Geography Conferences, 18: 159–165.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • William I. Woods
    • 1
  1. 1.Southern Illinois University EdwardsvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations