Geographies of Power in the Post-Cold War World-System
For a half-century the United States and the USSR oversaw a bi-polar world neatly divided into their spheres of influence. But the Cold War division abruptly ended with the Soviet Bloc’s collapse (1989–1991). How can we understand the present geographical organization of the international system of states? This is an important question: we must understand the sources and dynamics of international power if we are to effectively participate in creating a more just world order.
KeywordsEurope Income Triad Argentina Boulder
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Anderson, S. 2001. Seven Years Under NAFTA. Institute for Policy Studies. See www.ips-dc.org.Google Scholar
- Gereffi, G. and M. Korzeniewicz, eds. 1994. Commodity Chains and Global Capitalism. Westport: Praeger.Google Scholar
- Grabher, G. and D. Stark. 1998. Organizing Diversity: Evolutionary Theory, Network Analysis and Post-Socialism. In J. Pickles and A. Smith, eds. Theorising Transition, 54–75. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Gwynne, R., T. Klak, and D. Shaw. 2003. Alternative Capitalisms: Geographies of Emerging Regions. London: Edward Arnold Publishers.Google Scholar
- Gwynne, R. and C. Kay, eds. 2003. Latin America Transformed: Globalization and Modernity (2nd edition). London: Edward Arnold Publishers and NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Shannon, T., 1996. An Introduction to the World-System Perspective, 2nd edition. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
- Taylor, P. and C. Flint. 2000. Political Geography: World-Economy, Nation-State and Locality, 4th edition. NY: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
- Wade, R. 1996. Japan, the World Bank, and the Art of Paradigm Maintenance: The East Asian Miracle in Political Perspective. New Left Review 217: 3–36.Google Scholar
- Wallerstein, I. 1991. Geopolitics and Geoculture: Essays on the Changing World-System. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar