Abstract
As the 21st century begins, the Confederate battle emblem, a symbol more commonly associated with the 19th century, continues to divide the population of the American South, primarily along racial lines. During the past decade, strident debates over the public display of the Confederate battle emblem by state and local governments have been waged across the region. While some have dismissed these debates as inconsequential to the daily lives of the South’s population, their frequency and vitriolic character suggests otherwise. Geographers have been actively analyzing the underlying causes and ferocity of these debates using a variety of geographic concepts (e.g., Webster and Webster 1994; Leib 1995; Leib, Webster, and Webster 2000; Webster and Leib 2001; 2002; Leib and Webster 2002). In this essay, we demonstrate how the geographical concepts of public space and landscape representation can be used to better understand the dynamics of these controversies.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Alderman, D. 2000. A Street Fit for a King: Naming Places and Commemoration in the American South. The Professional Geographer 52: 672–684.
Ariail, R. 2001. Ariail!!!: More Cartoons by Robert Ariail. Columbia, SC: The State.
Balz, D. 2003. Democrats Caught in Confederate Issue. Washington Post 9 February: A5.
Bauerlein, V. and A. Sheinin. 2002. Cotton-Silk Mix May End Flag Flap. The State (Columbia, SC) January 24: A1.
Dwyer, O. 2000. Interpreting the Civil Rights Movement: Place, Memory and Conflict. The Professional Geographer 52: 660–671.
Leib, J. 1995. Heritage Versus Hate: A Geographical Analysis of Georgia’s Confederate Battle Flag Debate. Southeastern Geographer 35: 37–57.
Leib, J. 2002. Separate Times, Shared Spaces: Arthur Ashe, Monument Avenue, and the Politics of Richmond, Virginia’s Symbolic Landscape. Cultural Geographies 9: 286–312.
Leib, J. and G. Webster. 2002. The Confederate Flag Debate in the American South: Theoretical and Conceptual Perspectives. In A. Willingham, ed. Beyond the Color Line?: Race, Representation and Community in the New Century, 221–242. New York: Brennan Center for Justice at NYU Law School.
Leib, J., G. Webster, and R. Webster. 2000. Rebel With a Cause? Iconography and Public Memory in the Southern United States. Geojournal 52: 303–310.
Mitchell, D. 1995. The End of Public Space? People’s Park, Definitions of the Public, and Democracy. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 85: 108–133.
Mitchell, D. 1996. The Lie of the Land: Migrant Workers and the California Landscape. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Schein, R. 1997. The Place of Landscape: A Conceptual Framework for Interpreting an American Scene. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 87: 660–680.
Webster, G. and J. Leib. 2001. Whose South is it Anyway? Race and the Confederate Battle Flag in South Carolina. Political Geography 20: 271–299.
Webster G. and J. Leib. 2002. Political Culture, Religion and the Confederate Battle Flag Debate in Alabama. Journal of Cultural Geography 20: 1–26.
Webster, G. and R. Webster. 1994. The Power of an Icon. Geographical Review 84: 131–143.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2004 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Leib, J., Webster, G. (2004). Banner Headlines: The Fight over Confederate Flags in the American South. In: Janelle, D.G., Warf, B., Hansen, K. (eds) WorldMinds: Geographical Perspectives on 100 Problems. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-2352-1_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-2352-1_11
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-1613-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-2352-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive