Advertisement

Agrobacterium-Mediated Transformation of Canola

  • V. Cardoza
  • C. N. StewartJr.

Abstract

Canola (Brassica napus L.) is an important oil crop, ranking third only to soybean and palm oil in global production. It is a member of the family Brassicacea (syn. Cruciferae). It is a winter or spring crop and is amenable to growth in cooler climates. Once considered a specialty crop for Canada, it is now a global crop. Many other countries including the USA, Australia and those in Europe also grow canola. However, Canada and the United States account for most of the canola crop. It is grown mostly in Western Canada and North Central United States. In the year 2002, in Canada alone, 9.6 million acres of canola was grown (1) and in the USA, 1.5 million acres was devoted to canola cultivation (2). The term ‘canola’ was adopted by Canada apparently as an acronym of the Canadian Oilseed Association in 1979. Although canola has been commonly also known as rapeseed or oilseed rape, in the strict sense canola oil is defined as an oil that must contain less than 2% erucic acid, and the solid component of the seed must contain less than 30 μM of any one or a mixture of 3-butenyl glucosinolate, 4-pentenyl glucosinolate, 2-hydroxy-3 butenyl glucosinolate, and 2-hydroxy-4-pentenyl glucosinolate per gram of air-dry, oil-free solid.

Keywords

Brassica Napus Oilseed Rape Erucic Acid Callus Induction Medium Canola Meal 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
  2. 2.
  3. 3.
    Sovero M (1993). Rapeseed, a new oilseed crop for the United States. In: Janick J, Simon JE (eds.), New Crops. Wiley, New York, USA, pp. 302–307.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Facciotti MT, Bertain PB and Yuan L (1999). Improved stearate phenotype in transgenic canola expressing a modified acyl-acyl carrier protein thioesterase. Nature Biotechnology. 17: 593–597.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Knutzon DS, Hayes TR, Wyrick A, Xiong H, Davies HM and Voelker TA (1999). Lysophosphatidic acid acyltransferase from coconut endosperm mediates the insertion of laurate at the sn-2 position of triacylglycerols in lauric rapeseed oil and can increase total laurate levels. Plant Physiology, 120: 739–746.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Stoutjesdijk PA, Hurlestone C, Singh SP and Green AG (2000). High-oleic acid Australian Brassica napus and B. juncea varieties produced by co-suppression of endogenous Delta 12desaturases. Biochemial Society Transactions, 28: 938–940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Liu JW, De Michele S, Bergana M, Bobik E, Hastilow C, Chuang LT, Mukerji P and Huang YS (2001). Characterization of oil exhibiting high gamma-linolenic acid from a genetically transformed canola strain. Journal of the American Oil Chemists ‘s Society, 78: 489–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Katavic V, Friesen W, Barton DL, Gossen KK, Giblin EM, Luciw T, An J, Zou JT, MacKenzie SL, Keller WA, Males D and Taylor DC (2001) Improving erucic acid content in rapeseed through biotechnology: What can the Arabidopsis FAE1 and the yeast SLC1–1 genes contribute? Crop Science, 41: 739–747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Oelck MM, Phan CV, Eckes P, Donn G, Rakow G and Keller WA (1991). Field resistance of canola transformants (Brassica napus L.) to Ignite (Phosphinothricin) In: McGregor DI (ed), Proceedings of the GCIRC Eighth International Rapeseed Congress. July 9–11, 1991 Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada, pp. 292–297.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Monsanto (2002). Safety assessment of Roundup Ready canola event GT73. http://www.monsanto.com/monsanto/content/our_pledge/roundupcanola_product.odf
  11. 11.
    Stewart CN Jr, Adang MJ, All JA, Raymer PL, Ramachandran S and Parrott WA (1996). Insect control and dosage effects in transgenic canola containing a synthetic Bacillus thuringiensis cryIAC gene. Plant Physiology, 112: 115–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Grison R, Grezesbesset B, Schneider M, Lucante N, Olsen L, Leguay JJ and Toppan A (1996). Field tolerance to fungal pathogens of Brassica napus constitutively expressing a chimeric chitinase gene. Nature Biotechnology, 14: 643–646.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Basu U, Good AG and Taylor GJ (2001). Transgenic Brassica napus plants overexpressing aluminum-induced mitochondrial manganese superoxide dismutase cDNA are resistant to aluminum. Plant, Cell and Environment, 24: 1269–1278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Houmiel KL, Slater S, Broyles D, Casagrande L, Colburn S, Gonzalez K, Mitsky TA, Reiser SE et al. (1999). Poly (β-hydroxybutyrate) production in oilseed leukoplasts of Brassica napus. Planta, 209: 547–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Giddings G, Allison G, Brooks D, and Carter A (2000). Transgenic plants as factories for biopharmaceuticals. Nature Biotechnology, 18: 1151–1155.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Fry J, Barnason A and Horsch RB (1987). Transformation of Brassica napus with Agrobacterium based vectors. Plant Cell Reports, 6: 321–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pua EC, Mehra Palta A, Nagy F and Chua NH (1987). Transgenic plants of Brassica napus L. Bio/Technology, 5: 815–817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Moloney MM, Walker JM and Sharma KK (1989). High efficiency transformation of Brassica napus using Agrobacterium vectors. Plant Cell Reports, 8: 238–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Radke SE, Andrews BM, Moloney MM, Crouch ML, Krid JC and Knauf VC (1988). Transformation of Brassica napus L. using Agrobacterium tumefaciens: developmentally regulated expression of a reintroduced napin gene. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 75: 685–694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    De Block M, De Brower D and Tenning P (1989). Transformation of Brassica napus and Brassica oleracea using Agrobacterium tumefaciens and the expression of the bar and neo genes in the transgenic plants. Plant Physiology, 91: 694–701.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Cardoza V and Stewart CN Jr (2003). Increased Agrobacterium mediated transformation and rooting efficiencies in canola (Brassica napus L.) from hypocotyls explants. Plant Cell Reports, 21: 599–604.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Souvre A, Jardinaud MF and Alibert G (1996). Transformation of rape (Brassica napus L.) through the haploid embryogenesis pathway. Acta Societatis Botanicorum Poloniae, 65: 194–195.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Jones-villeneuve E, Huang B, Prudhomme I, Bird S, Kemble R, Hattori J and Miki B (1995). Assessment of microinjection for introducing DNA into uninuclear microspores of rapeseed. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture, 40: 97–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Fukuoka H, Ogawa T, Matsuoka M, Ohkawa Y and Yano H (1998). Direct gene delivery into isolated microspores of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) and the production of fertile transgenic plants. Plant Cell Reports, 17: 323–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Nehlin L, Moellers C, Bergman P and Glimelius K (2000). Transient beta-gus and gfp gene expression and viability analysis of microprojectile bombarded microspores of Brassica napus L. Journal of Plant Physiology, 156: 175–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hervé C, Rouan D, Guerche P, Montané MH and Yot P (1993). Molecular analysis of transgenic rapeseed plants obtained by direct transfer of 2 separate plasmids containing, respectively, the cauliflower mosaic virus coat protein gene and a selectable marker gene. Plant Science, 91: 181–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Chen JL and Beversdorf WD (1994). A combined use of microprojectile bombardment and DNA imbibition enhances transformation frequency of canola (Brassica napus L.). Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 88: 187–192.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Halfhill MD, Richards HA, Mabon SA and Stewart CN Jr (2001). Expression of GFP and Bt transgenes in Brassica napus and hybridization with Brassica rapa. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 103: 659–667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ovesná J, Ptacek L and Opartny Z (1993). Factors influencing the regeneration capacity of oilseed rape and cauliflower in transformation experiments. Biologia Plantarum, 35: 107–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Schröder M, Dixelius C, Råhlèn L and Glimelius K (1994). Transformation of Brassica napus by using the aadA gene as selectable marker and inheritance studies of the marker genes. Physiologia Plantrum, 92: 37–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Murashige T and Skoog F (1962). A revised medium tor rapid growth and bioassay with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiologia Plantarum, 15: 473–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Harper, BK, Mabon SA, Leffel SM, Halthill MD, Richards HA, Moyer KA and Stewart UN Jr (1999). Green fluorescent protein in transgenic plants indicates the presence and expression of a second gene. Nature Biotechnology, 17: 1125–1129.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • V. Cardoza
    • 1
  • C. N. StewartJr.
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Plant SciencesUniversity of TennesseeKnoxvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations