Skip to main content

The Remmelink Contention and the British Criticism

  • Chapter
  • 485 Accesses

Part of the book series: International Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine ((LIME,volume 20))

Abstract

The next question was: The Remmelink Commission held that actively ending life when the vital functions have started failing is indisputably normal medical practice.1 Is this correct? What is your opinion?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Henk A.M.J. ten Have, “Euthanasia: The Dutch Experience,” Annals de la Real Academia Nacional de Medicina, Tomo CXII (Madrid, 1995), p. 429.

    Google Scholar 

  2. House of Lords, Select Committee on Medical Ethics, session 1993–94, Vol. II, Minutes of Oral Evidence (London: HMSO, 1994), at 33.

    Google Scholar 

  3. In his comments, van Dantzig wrote: “I hope that you will be so kind as to remove all linkage between Prof. Dupuis and myself. She is a friend of mine, and I hold her in the highest regard, but on some things we are of different opinions.” Personal communication on July 6, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  4. In “A Case Against Dutch Euthanasia,” op. cit., pp. 24–25, Fenigsen argued that in 1987, a series of killings of comatose patients took place at the department of neurosurgery at the Free University Hospital in Amsterdam. Four nurses were responsible for these serial killings. Furthermore, a doctor was apprehended in The Hague under suspicion of having killed twenty inhabitants of the De Terp old people’s home without their consent or knowledge. He pleaded guilty to five, was accused of four, and convicted of three killings. Witnesses testified that some of the victims were not ill but only senile and querulous, and that the doctor was impatient with elderly people, reluctant to treat them, frequently absent, and left many decisions to the male head nurse. Hendin writes on angels of death, a team of travelling physicians that provided euthanasia to patients when family doctors were unwilling to do so. See Herbert Hendin, Seduced by Death, op. cit., pp. 110–113.

    Google Scholar 

  5. According to the physicians’ interviews in the 1995 survey, physicians consulted with a colleague in 93% of the reported cases, but in only 18% of the unreported cases of euthanasia and assisted suicide. Gerrit van der Wal and P.J. van der Maas, “Empirical Research on Euthanasia and Other Medical End-of-Life Decisions and the Euthanasia Notification Procedure,” in David C. Thomasma et al. (eds.), Asking to Die, op., cit., Table 6, p. 176.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer Science + Business Media, Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

(2005). The Remmelink Contention and the British Criticism. In: Euthanasia in the Netherlands. International Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine, vol 20. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-2251-7_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-2251-7_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-2250-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-2251-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics