Advertisement

Into the Methodological Void

Researching Systemic Consequences of International Regimes
  • Gregor Walter
  • Michael Zürn
Chapter

Abstract

“We live in a world that is already in fact very different from the one which we have begun to comprehend, and by the time our comprehension has caught up with the new reality, the world is likely to be even more drastically different in ways that today seem unthinkable.”

This aphorism by Zbigniew Brzewinski is used as an epitaph in a book about “Global Public Policy” (Reinicke 1998). It explicitly points to the speed of the changes in world politics and to the substantial difficulties in grasping it. It tells us that we live in a time of transformation, which is different from the past, but also different from the future. In the context of this volume one very significant element of contemporary change certainly is an unprecedented rise of international regimes. The overall number of multilateral treaties as deposited with the United Nations has grown in a linear fashion from less than 150 in 1960 to well over 400 in 1998 (Hirschi et al. 1999: 40). It seems fair to speak of a roughly comparable number of international regimes (Keohane 1993). This growth pattern is replicated on the level of different issue areas. The number of new international environmental treaties and agreements has grown continuously since the beginning of the century. While up until the 1970s, in average every five years brought about five new treaties, this number has increased to about 25 from the 1980s onwards (see Beisheim et al. 1999: 351). A very similar pattern applies to the development of new international economic treaties and agreements (ibid.: 353). Will this rise of international regimes lead to “systemic consequences”? Will it change the deep structure of international society? Will the identity and role of states change as a result of multi-level governance? Will a very dense set of resilient international regimes foster peace?

Keywords

International Relation World Politics Qualitative Comparative Analysis Issue Area International Regime 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Beisheim, M., Dreher S., Gregor, W., Zangl, B., and Zürn, M. (1999) Im Zeitalter der Globalisierung? Thesen und Daten zur gesellschaftlichen und politischen Denationalisierung, Baden-Baden (Nomos).Google Scholar
  2. Bernauer, T. (2000) Staaten im Wandel: Zur Handlungsfähigkeit von Staaten trotz wirtschaftlicher Globalisierung, Leske + Budrich, Opladen.Google Scholar
  3. Biersteker, T. J. (1993) Constructing Historical Counterfactuals to Assess the Consequences of International Regimes: The Global Debt Regime and the Course of the Debt Crisis of the 1980s, in V. Rittberger, (ed.) Regime Theory and International Relations, Clarendon, Oxford.Google Scholar
  4. Breitmeier, H. and Wolf, K. D. (1996) Analyzing Regimes Consequences: Conceptual Outcomes and Environmental Explorations, in H. Breitmeier, M. A. Levy, O. R. Young, and M. Zürn, Regime Theory and International Relations, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Eckstein, H. (1975) Case Study and Theory in Political Science, in F. Greenstein, N. W. Polby (eds.) Handbook of Political Science, Addison-Wesley Press, Reading, MA.Google Scholar
  6. Eichengreen, B. (1998) Dental Hygiene and Nuclear Waste: How International Relations Looks from Economics, International Organization 52, 4: 993–1012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fearon, J. (1991) Counterfactuals and Hypothesis Testing in Political Science, World Politics 43, 2: 169–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Frieden, J. A. (199 1) Invested Interests: the Politics of National Economic Policies in a World of Global Finance, International Organization 45, 4: 425–51.Google Scholar
  9. Galtung, J. (1967) On the Effects of International Economic Sanctions: With Examples from the Case of Rhodesia, World Politics 19, 3: 378–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Garrett, G. (1998a) Partisan Politics in the Global Economy, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Garrett, G. (1998b) Global Markets and National Politics: Collision Course or Virtuous Circle, International Organization 52, 4: 787–824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Genschel, P. (2001) Globalization, Tax Competition, and the Fiscal Viability of the Welfare State, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, Köln, Working Paper 01 /1.Google Scholar
  13. Gilpin, R. (1981) War and Change in World Politics, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Gourevitch, P. (1978) The Second Image Reversed: the International Sources of Domestic Politics, International Organization, 32 4: 881–912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gourevitch, P. (1986) Politics in Hard Times: Comparative Responses to International Economic Crises, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York.Google Scholar
  16. Hasenclever, A., Mayer, P. and Rittberger, V. (1996) Justice, Equality, and the Robustness of International Regimes, Tübinger Arbeitspapiere zur Internationalen Politik und Friedensforschung.Google Scholar
  17. Held, D., McGrew, A., Goldblatt, D. and Perraton, J. (1999) Global Transformations: Politics, Economics and Culture, Polity Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  18. Hirschi, C., Serdült, U. und Widmer, T. (1991) Schweizerische Außenpolitik im Wandel, in Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft 5, 1: 31–56.Google Scholar
  19. Hirst, P. and Thompson, G. (1996) Globalization in Question. The International Economy and the Possibilities of Governance, Polity Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  20. Hollis, M. and Smith, S. (1991) Explaining and Understanding International Relations, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  21. Holm, H.-H. and Sørensen, G. (eds.) (1995) Whose World Order? Uneven Globalization and the End of the Cold War, Westview Press, Boulder, Co.Google Scholar
  22. Hughes, B. B. (1999) International Futures: Choices in the Face of Uncertainty, 3rd ed., Westview Press, Boulder, CO.Google Scholar
  23. IHDP (International Human Dimensions Programme on Global Environmental Change) (1999) Institutional Dimenations of Global Environmental Change. Science Plan, IHDP Report No. 9, IHDP, Bonn.Google Scholar
  24. Jachtenfuchs, M. and Kohler-Koch, B. (eds.) (1996) Europäische Integration, Leske + Budrich, Opladen.Google Scholar
  25. Katzenstein, P. J. (1984) Corporatism and Change: Austria, Switzerland, and the Politics of Industry, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York.Google Scholar
  26. Katzenstein, P. J. (1985) Small States in World Markets: Industrial Policy in Europe, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York.Google Scholar
  27. Kennedy, P. M. (1989) The Rise and Fall of The Great Powers: Economic Change and Military Conflict From 1500 to 2000, Vintage Books, New York.Google Scholar
  28. Keohane, R. O. (1993) The Analysis of International Regimes: Towards a European–American Research Programme, in V. Rittberger with the assistance of P. Mayer (ed.) Regime Theory and International Relations, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  29. King, G., Keohane, R. O. and Verba, S. (1994) Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Krasner, S. (1999) Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Levy, M. A., Young, O.R. and Zürn, M. (1995) The Study of International Regimes, European Journal of International Relations 1, 3: 267–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Litfin, K. (1997) Sovereignty in World Ecopolitics, Mershon International Studies Review 41, 2: 167–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lyons, G. M. and Mastanduno, M. (eds.) (1995) Beyond Westphalia? State Sovereignty and International Intervention, John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.Google Scholar
  34. Marks, G., Schmitter, P. C., Scharpf, F. W. and Streeck, W. (eds.) (1996) Governance in the European Union, Sage, London.Google Scholar
  35. McKeown, T. J. (1999) Case Studies and the Statistical Worldview: Review of King, Keohane, and Verba’s Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inferences in Qualitative Research, International Organization 53, 1: 161–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J. and Behrens, W. W. (1972) The Limits to Growth. Potomac Associates, New York.Google Scholar
  37. Mersarovic, M., and Pesterl, E. (1975) Mankind at the Turning Point, Hutchinson, London.Google Scholar
  38. Miles, E., and Underdal, A. (eds.) (2000) Explaining Regime Effectiveness: Confronting Theory with Evidence, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  39. Milner, H. E. (1988) Resisting Protectionism: Global Industries and the Politics of International Trade, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Nossal, K. R. (1989) International Sanctions as International Punishment, International Organization 43, 2: 301–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ougaard, M. (1999) The OECD in the Global Polity, paper prepared for workshop in SSRC Project “Globalization, Statehood, and World Order”, Firenze, Italy, October 1 –3, 1999.Google Scholar
  42. Ragin, C. C. (1987) The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies, University of California Press.Google Scholar
  43. Ragin, C. (1994) Introduction to Qualitative Comparative Analysis, in T. Janows and A. Hicks, (eds.) The Comparative Political Economy of the Welfare State: New Methodologies and Approaches, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Ragin, C. (2000) Fuzzy-Set Social Science, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  45. Reinicke, W. (1998) Global Public Policies: Governing without Governments, Brookings Institute, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  46. Rittberger, V. (ed.) (1990) International Regimes in East-West Politics, Pinter, London, New York.Google Scholar
  47. Rittberger, V. and Zürn, M. (ed.) (1990) Towards Regulated Anarchy in East-West Relations, in V. Rittberger (ed.) International Regimes in East-West Politics, Pinter, London, New York.Google Scholar
  48. Rodrik, D. (1997) Has Globalization Gone too Far? Institute for International Economics, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  49. Rogowski, R. (1989) Commerce and Coalitions: How Trade Affects Domestic Political Alignments, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Rosenau, J. N. (1997) Along the Domestic-Foreign Frontier: Exploring Governance in a Turbulent World, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Sørensen, G. (1997) An Analysis of Contemporary Statehood: Consequences for Conflict and Cooperation, Review of International Studies 23, 3: 253–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sørensen, G. (1999) Change and Continuity in a Fundamental Institution, Political Studies 47, 3: 590–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Thomson, J. E. (1995) State Sovereignty and International Relations: Bridging the Gap Between Theory and Empirical Research, International Studies Quarterly 39, 2: 213–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Volker R. and Mayer, P. (eds.) The International Regimes Database as a Tool for the Study of International Cooperation, working paper WP-96–160, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  55. Wolf, R. (1999) Partnerschaft oder Realität? Verbündete Großmächte nach Hegemonialkonflikten, Habilitation, Universität Halle.Google Scholar
  56. Young, O. R, (ed.) (1999) The Effectiveness of International Environmental Regimes: Causal Connection and Behavioral Mechanisms, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  57. Zürn, M. (1998) The Rise of International Environmental Politics: A Review of Current Research, World Politics 50, 4: 617–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Zürn, M., Walter, G., Dreher, S. and Beisheim, M. (2000) Postnationale Politik? Über den politischen Umgang mit den Denationalisierungsherausforderungen Internet, Klima und Migration, Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen 7, 2: 297–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Zürn, M., Walter, G. (ed.) (2003) Globalizing Interests: Pressure Groups and Denationalization, State University of New York Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gregor Walter
    • 1
  • Michael Zürn
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute für Intercultural and International StudiesUniversity of BremenGermany

Personalised recommendations