Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Truth-Seeking by Abduction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Induction and Deduction in the Sciences

Part of the book series: Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook ((VCIY,volume 11))

Abstract

In a seminar with the title “Deduction and Induction in the Sciences”, it is intriguing to ask the following questions: (i) Is there a third type of inference besides deduction and induction? (ii) Does this third type of inference play a significant role within scientific inquiry? A positive answer to both of these questions was advocated by Charles S. Peirce throughout his career, even though his opinions changed in important ways during the fifty years between 1865 and 1914. Peirce called the third kind of inference “hypothesis”, “abduction”, or “retroduction”.1 In this paper, I shall follow Peirce’s steps in discussing abduction by analyzing its logical form (Sections 1–3), its role in science (Section 4), and the grounds of its validity (Sections 5–6). We shall see that Peirce’s discussion is more insightful than many recent attempts to analyze abductive inference. Still, recently some progress has been made in the treatment of abduction within the Bayesian theory of epistemic probability (Section 6) and truth-approximation (Section 7). The results of this work support the view of scientific realism: abduction or inference to the best explanation (IBE), combined with empirical and experimental testing of scientific theories, is the best method of seeking informative truths in science (Section 8).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aliseda-Llera, A. Seeking Explanations: Abduction in Logic, Philosophy of Science and Artificial Intelligence. ILLC Dissertation Series, Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolzano, B., Theory of Science. Oxford: Blackwell 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boole, G. The Laws of Thought. New York: Dover 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douven, I. “Inference to the Best Explanation Made Coherent”, in: Philosophy of Science (Proceedings) 66, 1999, pp. S424–S435.

    Google Scholar 

  • Earman, J. Bayes or Bust? A Critical Examination of Bayesian Confirmation Theory. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Festa, R. “Bayesian Confirmation”, in: Galavotti, M. and Pagnini, A. (eds.), Experience, Reality, and Scientific Explanation. Dordrecht: Kluwer 1999, pp. 55–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fetzer, J.H. Scientific Knowledge: Causation, Explanation, and Corroboration. Dordrecht: D. Reidel 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flach, P.A. and Kakas, A.C. (eds.). Abduction and Induction: Essays on their Relation and Integration. Dordrecht: Kluwer 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fumerton, R.A. “Induction and Reasoning to the Best Explanation”, in: Philosophy of Science 47, 1980, pp. 589–600.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hajek, P. “Agnosticism meets Bayesianism”, in: Analysis 58, 1998, pp. 199–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, N.R. “Is There a Logic of Discovery?”, in: Feigl, H. and Maxwell, G. (eds.), Current Issues in the Philosophy of Science. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston 1961, pp. 20–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harman, G. “Inference to the Best Explanation”, in: The Philosophical Review 74, 1965, pp. 88–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hempel, C.G. Aspects of Scientific Explanation. New York: The Free Press 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hintikka, J. “The Varieties of Information and Scientific Explanation”, in: van Rootselaar, B. and Staal, J.F. (eds.), Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science Ill. Amsterdam: NorthHolland, 1968, pp. 151–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hintikka, J. “The Place of C.S. Peirce in the History of Logical Theory”, in: Lingua Universalis vs. Calculus Ratiocinator. Selected Papers 2. Dordrecht: Kluwer 1997, pp. 140–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hintikka, J. “What is Abduction? The Fundamental Problem of Contemporary Epistemology”, in: Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 34, 1998, pp. 503–533.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hon, G. and Rakover, S.S. (eds.). Explanation: Theoretical Approaches and Applications. Dordrecht: Kluwer 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howson, C. and Urbach, P. Scientific Reasoning: The Bayesian Approach. La Salle: Open Court 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Josephson, J. and Josephson, S. (eds.). Abductive Inference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuipers, T. “Abduction aiming at Empirical Progress or even Truth Approximation leading to a Challenge for Computational Modelling”, in: Foundations of Science 4, 1999, pp. 307–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuipers, T. From Instrumentalism to Constructive Realism: On Some Relations between Confirmation, Empirical Progress, and Truth Approximation. Dordrecht: Kluwer 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladyman, J., Douven, I., Horsten, L., and van Fraassen, B.C. “A Defence of van Fraassen’s Critique of Abductive Reasoning: Reply to Psillos”, in: The Philosophical Quarterly 47, 1997, pp. 305–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langley, P., Simon, H.A., Bradshaw, G.L. and Zytkow, J.M. Scientific Discovery: Computational Explorations of the Creative Processes. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laudan, L. Science and Values: The Aims of Science and Their Role in Scientific Debate. Berkeley: University of California Press 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laudan, L. Science and Relativism. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi, I. Gambling with Truth. New York: Alfred A. Knopf 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipton, P. Inference to the Best Explanation. London: Routledge 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipton, P. “What Good is an Explanation?”, in: Hon and Rakover (2001a), pp. 43–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipton, P. “Is Explanation a Guide to Inference? A Reply to Wesley C. Salmon”, in: Hon and Rakover (2001b), pp. 93–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monton, B. “Bayesian Agnosticism and Constructive Empiricism”, in: Analysis 58, 1998, pp. 207–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nesher, D. “Peircean Epistemology of Learning and the Function of Abduction as the Logic of Discovery”, in: Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 37, 2001, pp. 23–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niiniluoto, I. “Statistical Explanation Reconsidered”, in: Synthese 48, 1981, pp. 437–472.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niiniluoto, I. “Novel Facts and Bayesianism”, in: The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 34, 1983, pp. 375–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niiniluoto, I. Is Science Progressive?. Dordrecht: D. Reidel 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niiniluoto, I.Truthlikeness. Dordrecht: D. Reidel 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niiniluoto, I. “Analogy and Similarity in Inductive Logic”, in: Helman, D. (ed.), Analogical Reasoning. Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 1988, pp. 271–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niiniluoto, I. “Peirce’s Theory of Statistical Explanation”, in: Moore, E.C. (ed.), Charles S. Peirce and the Philosophy of Science, Tuscaloosa and London: The University of Alabama Press, 1993, pp. 186–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niiniluoto, I. “Descriptive and Inductive Simplicity”, in: Salmon, W. and Wolters, G. (eds.), Logic, Language, and the Structure of Scientific Theories. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1994, pp. 147–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niiniluoto, I. “Hintikka and Whewell on Aristotelian Induction”, in: Grazer Philosophische Studien 49, 1995, pp. 49–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niiniluoto, I. “Inductive Logic, Atomism, and Observational Error”, in: Sintonen, M. (ed.), Knowledge and Inquiry. Amsterdam, Rodopi, 1997, pp. 117–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niiniluoto, I. “Verisimilitude: The Third Period”, in: The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 49, 1998, pp. 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niiniluoto, I. Critical Scientific Realism. Oxford: Oxford University Press 1999a.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niiniluoto, I. “Defending Abduction”, in: Philosophy of Science (Proceedings) 66, 1999b, pp. S436–S451.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niiniluoto, I. “Abduction and Geometrical Analysis”, in: Magnani, L., Nersessian, N. and Thagard, P. (eds.), Model-Based Reasoning in Scientific Discovery. New York: Kluwer and Plenum, 1999c, pp. 239–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niiniluoto, I. “Hempel’s Theory of Statistical Explanation”, in: J.H. Fetzer (ed.), Science, Explanation, and Rationality: The Philosophy of Carl G. Hempel. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000, pp. 138–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niiniluoto, I. “Abduction and Truthlikeness”, in: R. Festa, A. Aliseda, and J. Peijnenburg (eds.), Confirmation, Empirical Progress, and Truth-Approximation, Rodopi, Amsterdam, forthcoming 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niiniluoto, I. and Tuomela, R. Theoretical Concepts and Hypothetico-Inductive Inference. Dordrecht: D. Reidel 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okasha, S. “Van Fraassen’s Critique of Inference to the Best Explanation”, in: Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 31, 2000, pp. 691–710.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, C.S. Collected Papers 1–6, ed. by C. Hartshorne and P. Weiss, 7–8, ed. by A. Burks. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press 1931–35, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, C.S. Writings of Charles S. Peirce: A Chronological Edition, vols. 1–4, ed. by M.H. Fisch et al., Bloomington: Indiana University Press 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, Charles S. Reasoning and the Logic of Things: The Cambridge Conferences Lectures of 1898, ed. by K.L. Ketner. Cambridge. MA: Harvard University Press 1992a.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, Charles S. The Essential Peirce vol. 1 (1867–1893), ed. by N. Houser and C. Kloesel, Bloomington: Indiana University Press 1992b.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, Charles S. The Essential Peirce vol. 2 (1893–1913), ed. by N. Houser and C. Kloesel, Bloomington: Indiana University Press 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K.R. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London: Hutchinson 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  • Psillos, S. “On van Fraassen’s Critique of Abductive Reasoning”, in: Philosophical Quarterly 46, 1996, pp. 31–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Psillos, S. Scientific Realism: How Science Tracks Truth. London: Routledge 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmon, W. “Explanation and Confirmation: A Bayesian Critique of Inference to the Best Explanation”, in: Hon and Rakover (2001a), pp. 61–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmon, W. “Reflections of a Bashful Bayesian: A Reply to Peter Lipton”, in: Hon and Rakover (2001b), pp. 121–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schurz, G. “Models of Abduction — From an Interrogative Viewpoint”, in: Synthese, forthcoming 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smokler, H. “Conflicting Conceptions of Confirmation”, in: The Journal of Philosophy 65, 1968, pp. 300–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Fraassen, B. The Scientific Image. Oxford: Oxford University Press 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Fraassen, B. Laws and Symmetry. Oxford: Oxford University Press 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Fraassen, B. “The Agnostic subtly Probabilified”, in: Analysis 58, 1998, pp. 212–220.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Philosophy, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 9, 00014, Finland

    Ilkka Niiniluoto

Authors
  1. Ilkka Niiniluoto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Vienna and Institut Vienna Circle, Austria

    Friedrich Stadler

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Niiniluoto, I. (2004). Truth-Seeking by Abduction. In: Stadler, F. (eds) Induction and Deduction in the Sciences. Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook, vol 11. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-2196-1_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-2196-1_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-6555-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-2196-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation