Abstract
The conformal transformations presented in the previous chapter establish a mathematical equivalence between scalar-tensor theories and Einstein’s general relativity, with the modifications dictated by the anomalous coupling of the Einstein frame scalar to ordinary matter and its consequences. A priori, the mathematical equivalence need not be a physical one. The literature using conformal transformations in cosmology and in alternative theories of gravity is plagued by confusion and ambiguity on the issue of the physical equivalence of the two conformal frames, or which frame should be regarded as the physical one. As a consequence, the conformal transformation technique is often misused and its results are given erroneous interpretations. Incompatible points of view occurring in the literature support the following ideas [613, 363] :
-
(first viewpoint) that the Jordan and the Einstein frame are physically equivalent,
-
(second viewpoint) that the two frames are inequivalent the Jordan frame is the physical one, and the Einstein frame is unphysical,
-
(third viewpoint) that the two frames are inequivalent — the Jordan frame is unphysical, and the Einstein frame is physical.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2004 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Faraoni, V. (2004). Effective Energy-Momentum Tensors and Conformal Frames. In: Cosmology in Scalar-Tensor Gravity. Fundamental Theories of Physics, vol 139. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-1989-0_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-1989-0_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-6564-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-1989-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive