Abstract
Latent growth curve analysis (McArdle, 1986, 1988; Meredith & Tisak, 1990; Willett & Sayer, 1994) is well suited to analyze systematic change in longitudinal data collected from a panel design. It represents outcome variables explicitly as a function of time and other measures. Specifically, latent growth curve analysis is a Statistical technique to estimate the Parameters that represent the growth curves that are assumed to have given rise to the structure of the repeatedly measured outcome variable over time. Growth curve analysis can be applied just to get a (unconditional) description of the mean growth over a certain period of time. However, the emphasis of this technique lies in explanation of differences between subjects in the parameters describing the growth curves; in other words, in the systematic inter-individual differences in intra-individual change.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Literature
Bandalos, D.L. (2002). The effects of item parceling on goodness-of-fit and Parameter estimate bias. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 78–102.
Bechger, T.M. (1997). Methodological aspects ofcomparison of educational achievement: the case of reading literacy. Doctoral Dissertation, Amsterdam: TT-publications.
Bock, R. D. (1979). Univariate and multivariate analysis of variance of timestructured data. In J. R. Nesselroade & P. B. Baltes (Eds.), Longitudinal research in the study of behavior and development (pp. 199–231). New York: Academic Press.
Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley.
Browne, M. W. (1982). Covariance structures. In D. M. Hawkins (Ed.), Topics in applied multivariate analysis (pp. 72–141). Cambridge: University Press.
Browne, M. & DuToit, S. (1991). Analysis of learning curves. In L. Collins & J.L. Hörn (Eds.), Best methodsfor the analysis ofchange. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Byrne, B. M., Shavelson, R. J., & Muthen, B. (1989). Testing for the equivalence of factor covariance and meanstructures: the issue of partial measurement invariance. Psychological Bulletin, 705,45–466.
Chan, D. (1998). The conceptualization and analysis of change over time: An integrative approach incorporating longitudinal mean and covariance structures analysis (LMACS) and multiple indicator latent growth modeling (MLGM). Organizational Research Methods, 7, 421–483.
De Pijper, W. M., & Saris, W. E. (1982). The effect of identification restrictions on the test statistics in latent variable modeis. In K. G. Jöreskog & H. Wold (Eds.), Systems under indirect Observation, part 1. Amsterdam: North Holland.
Dolan, C.V. & Molenaar, P.C.M. (1994). Testing specific hypotheses concerning latent group differences in multi-group covariance strueture analysis with struetured means. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 29, 203–222.
Drasgow, F. (1987).Study of the measurement bias of two standardized psychological tests. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 19–29.
Driessen, G., Langen, A. van & Vierke, H. (2000). Basisonderwijs: veldwerkverslag, leerlinggegevens enoudervragenlijst. Basisrapportage PRIMA-cohortonderzoek. Derdemeting 1998/99 [Primary education: research report, pupil’s data and parent’s questionary. Base report PRIMA cohort study. Third wave 1998/99]. Nijmegen: ITS, University of Nijmegen.
Duncan, T. E., Duncan, S. C, Strycker, L. A., Li, F., & Alpert, A. (1999). An introduction to latent growth curve modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Garst, H. (2000). Longitudinal research using structural equation modeling applied in studies of determinants of psychological well-being and personal initiave in East Germany öfter the unification. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Amsterdam.
Hall, R. J., Snell, A. F., & Foust, M. S. (1999). Item parceling strategies inSEM: Investigating the subtle effects of unmodeled secondary constructs. Organizational Research Methods, 2(3) , 233–256.
Hancock, G. R., Kuo, W. L., & Lawrence, F. R. (2001). An illustration of second-order latent growth modeis. Structural Equation Modeling, 8, 470–489.
Hörn, J.L. & McArdle, JJ.(1992). A practical and theoretical guide to measurement invariance in aging research. Experimental Aging Research, 18, 117– 144.
Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1988). LISREL 7: A guide to the program and applications. Chicago, IL: SPSS Inc.
Lubke, G.H. & Dolan, C.V. (2002). Can unequal residual variances across groups mask measurement invariance in the common factor model?. Manuscript accepted for publication.
Lubke, G. H., Dolan, C. V., Kelderman, H., & Mellenbergh, G. J. (2001). Absence of measurement blas with respect to unmeasured variables: An implication od strict factorial invariance. Manuscript submitted for publication.
MacCallum, R. C, Kim, C, Malarkey, W. B., & Kiecolt-Glaser, J. K. (1997). Studying multivariate change using multilevel modeis and latent growth curve modeis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 32, 215–253.
McArdle, J. J. (1986). Latent variable growth within behavior genetic modeis. Behavior Genetics, 16(1) , 163–200.
McArdle, J. J. (1988). Dynamic but structural equation modeling of repeated measures data. In R. B. Cattel, & J. Nesselroade (Eds.), Handbook of multivariate experimental psychology (2nd ed., pp. 561–614). New York: Plenum Press.
McArdle, JJ. (1989). Structural modeling experiments using multiple growth functions. In P. Ackerman, R. Kanfer & R. Cudeck (Eds.), Learning and individual differences: Abilities, Motivation and Methodology (pp. 71–117). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
McArdle, J. J. Anderson, E. (1990) . Latent variable growth modeis for research on aging. In Birren, J. E. Schaie, K. W., Handbook of the Psychology of Aging (pp.21–44). New York : Academic Press.
Mcardle, J.J., & Bell, R. Q. (2000). An introduction to latent growth modeis for developmental data analysis. In T.D. Little, K.U. Schnabel, & J.Baumert (Eds.), Modeling longitudinal and multilevel data (pp. 69–108). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
McArdle, J. J. & Cattell, B. R. (1994). Structural equation modeis of factorial invariance in parallel proportional profiles and oblique confactor Problems. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 29, 63–113.
McArdle, J. J., & Epstein, D. (1987). Latent growth curves within developmental structural equation modeis. Child Development, 58, 110–133.
McArdle, J. J. & Hamagami, F. (1992). Modeling incomplete longitudinal and cross-sectional data using latent growth structural modeis. Experimental Aging Research, 18, 145–166
McArdle, J. J. & Hamagami, F. (1996). Modeling incomplete longitudinal and cross-sectional data using latent growth structural modeis. Experimental Aging Research, 18, 145–166.
Mehta, P. D., & West, S. G. (2000). Putting the individual back into growth curves. Psychological Methods, 5, 23–41.
Mellenbergh, G.J., Kelderman, M., Stijlen, J.G. & Zondag, E. (1979). Linear modeis for the analysis and construction of instruments in a facet design.Psychological Bulletin, 86, 766–776.
Meredith, W. (1964). Notes on factorial invariance. Psychometrika, 29, 11–185
Meredith, W. (1993). Measurement invariance, factor analysis, and factorial invariance. Psychometrika, 58, 525–543.
Meredith, W. M., & Tisak, J. (1990). Latent curve analysis. Psychometrika, 55, 107–122.
Muthen, B., & Khoo, S. (1998). Longitudinal studies of achievement growth using latent variable modeling. Learning and Individual Differences,10, 73–102.
Muthen, L. K. & Muthen, B. O. (1998). Mplus 1.04 [Computer Software]. Los Angeles: Muthen & Muthen.
Oort, F. J. (2001). Three-mode modeis for multivariate longitudinal data British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 54, 49–78.
Pentz, M. A., & Chou, Ch. P. (1994). Measurement invariance in longitudinal clinical research assuming change from development and Intervention. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62, 450–462
Rao, C. R. (1958). Some Statistical methods for comparison of growth curves. Biometrics, 14,1–17.
Raykov, T. & Marcoulides, G.A. (2000). A First Course in Structural Equation Modeling. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Rogosa, D., Brandt, D., & Zimowski, M. (1982). A growth curve approach to the measurement of change. Quantitative Methods in Psychology, 92, 726–748.
Rogosa, D. & Willett, J. B. (1985). Understanding correlates of change by modeling individual differences in growth. Psychometrika, 50, 203–228.
Rovine, M.J., & Molenaar, P. C. M. (1998). A nonstandard method for estimating a linear growth model in LISREL.International Journal of Behavioral Development, 22, 453–473.
Saris, W.E. (1978). Introduction to the use of linear structural equation modeis in non-experimental research. Research Report, Amsterdam: Free University Amsterdam.
Sayer, A. G., & Cumsille, P. E. (2001). Second-order latent growth modeis. In L. M. Collins & A. G. Sayer (Eds.),New methods for the analysis of change (pp. 179–200).
Stoel, R. D., & Van den Wittenboer, G. (2003). Time dependence of growth Parameters in latent growth curve modeis with time invariant covariates. Methods of Psychological Research, 8, 21–41.
Stoolmiller, M. (1995). Using latent growth curve modeis to study developmental processes. In J. M. Gottman (Ed.), The analysis of change (pp. 103–138). New Jersey: Mahwah.
Tucker, L. R. (1958). Determination of parameters of a functional relation by factor analysis. Psychometrika, 23, 19–23.
Vandenberg, R.J., & Lance, C.E. (2000). A Review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3,4–70.
Willett, J. B., & Sayer, A. G. (1994). Using covariance structure analysis to detect correlates and predictors of individual change over time. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 363–381.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2004 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Stoel, R.D., van den Wittenboer, G., Hox, J. (2004). Methodological Issues in the Application of the Latent Growth Curve Model. In: van Montfort, K., Oud, J., Satorra, A. (eds) Recent Developments on Structural Equation Models. Mathematical Modelling: Theory and Applications, vol 19. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-1958-6_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-1958-6_13
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-6549-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-1958-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive