Skip to main content

The Role of Family and Situational Problems in Understanding and Reducing Impairment

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Assessing Impairment
  • 750 Accesses

Abstract

Impairment has a widespread impact on family functioning, routines, activities, and relationships between family members. Families provide an invaluable resource in assessing and addressing the needs of individuals experiencing impairment as well as those of other family members. Impairment manifests itself in many ways, but all forms are contextually relevant. An ecological perspective provides an alternative conceptualization of impairment to a biological, medical model. This framework extends the focus of assessment and intervention beyond the individual to other contexts within which the individual interacts. Two of the most important contexts in which that children interact are the home and school environments. Families have a great deal of knowledge and expertise regarding an individual's level of behavioral, social, and academic functioning in multiple settings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abidin, R.R. (1995). The Parenting Stress Index professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumrind, D. (1968). Authoritarian vs. authoritative parental control. Adolescence, 3, 255–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, B.L. (1985). A factor analysis of self-report measures of family functioning. Family Process, 24, 225–239.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brassard, M. R., & Boehm, A. E. (2007). Preschool assessment: Principles and practices. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bray, J.H. (1995). Family assessment: Current issues in evaluating families. Family Relations, 44, 469–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breslau, N. (1983). The psychological study of chronically ill and disabled children: Are healthy siblings appropriate controls? Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 11, 379–391.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, D., Downing, J. E., & Peckham-Hardin, K. D. (2002). Working with families of diverse cultural and linguistic backgrounds. In Koegel, L.K. Koegel, &R.L. DunlapG. , Positive behavior support: Including people with difficult behavior in the community (pp. 133–154). Baltimore: Brookes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colton, D., & Sheridan, S. M. (1998). Conjoint behavioral consultation and social skills training: Enhancing the play behavior of boys with attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 9, 3–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conoley, J. C., & Sheridan, S. M. (2005). Understanding and implementing school-family interventions after neuropsychological impairment. In Amato, R.C.D‚ Fletcher-Janzen, & E.F. Reynolds C.R. , Handbook of school neuropsychology (pp. 721–737). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crone, D. A., & Horner, R. H. (2003). Building positive behavior support systems in schools: Functional behavior assessment. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deal, A. G., Trivette, C. M., & Dunst, C. J. (1988). Family Functioning Style Scale. In Dunst, C. J. Trivette, & C. M. Deal A. G. , Enabling and empowering families: Principles and guidelines for practice (pp. 175–184). Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunst, C. J., Trivette, C. M., & Deal, A. G. (1994). Enabling and empowering families. In C. J. Dunst, C. M. Trivette, & A. G. Deal , Supporting and strengthening families: Methods, strategies, and practices (pp. 2–28). Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, N. B., Baldwin, L., & Bishop, D. S. (1983). The McMaster family assessment device. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 9, 171–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, N., Ryan, C., Bishop, D., Miller, I., & Keitner G. (2003). The McMaster model: A view of healthy functioning. In Walsh F., Normal family processes (3rd ed., pp. 581–607). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, L., Vaughn, B. J., Wyatte, M. L., Dunlap, G., & Bucy, M. (1997). Parent-professional partnership in behavioral support: A qualitative analysis of one family‚s experience. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 22, 198–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, L., Vaughn, B. J., Wyatte, M. L., & Dunlap, G. (2002). What we expect other people to understand: Family perspectives on problem behavior. Exceptional Children, 68, 437–450.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freer, P., & Watson, T. S. (1999). A comparison of parent and teacher acceptability ratings of behavioral and conjoint behavioral consultation. School Psychology Review, 28, 672–684.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galloway, J., & Sheridan, S. M. (1994). Implementing scientific practices through case studies: Examples using home-school interventions and consultation. Journal of School Psychology, 32, 385–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gath, A., & Gumley, D. (1987). Retarded children and their siblings. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 28, 715–730.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gellerstedt, M. E., & Mauksch, L. (1993). Chronic neurologic impairment: A family problem. Family Systems Medicine, 11, 425–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giallo, R., & Gavida-Payne, S. (2006). Child, parent, and family factors as predictors of adjustment for siblings of children with a disability. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 50. 937–948.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harry, B. (1992). Developing cultural self-awareness: The first step in values clarification for early interventionists. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education,12, 222–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heru, A., & Ryan, C. (2002). Depressive symptoms and family functioning in the caregivers of recently hospitalized patients with chronic/recurrent mood disorders. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 7, 53–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, A., & Haverkamp, D. E. (1991). Family response to traumatic brain injury. Counseling Psychology Quarterly, 4, 355–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J. (1985). The sociopolitical nature of counseling. The Counseling Psychologist, 13, 615–624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koegel, L. K., Steibel, D., & Koegel, R. L. (1998). Reducing aggression in children with autism toward infant or toddler siblings. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 23, 111–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucyshyn, J. M., Albin, R. W., & Nixon, C. D. (1997). Embedding comprehensive behavioral support in family ecology: An experimental, single-case analysis. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 65, 241–251.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lucyshyn, J. M., Horner, R. H., Dunlap, G., Albin, R. W., & Ben, K. R. (2002). Positive behavior support with families. In Lucyshyn, J.M. Dunlap, & G. Albin R. W. Families and positive behavior support: Addressing problem behavior in family contexts (pp. 3–43). Baltimore: Brookes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucyshyn, J. M., Kayser, A. T., Irvin, L. K., & Blumberg, E. R. (2002). Functional assessment and positive behavior support at home and families: Designing effective and contextually appropriate behavior support plans. In J. M. Lucyshyn, G. Dunlap, & R. W. Albin Families and positive behavior support: Addressing problem behavior in family contexts (pp. 3–43). Baltimore: Brookes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mactavish, J., B., MacKay, K. J., Iwasaki, Y., & Betteridge, D. (2007). Family caregivers of individuals with intellectual disability: Perspectives on life quality and the role of vacations. Journal of Leisure Research, 39, 127–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCubbin, H.I., & McCubbin, M.A., & Thompson, A.I. (1993). Resiliency in families: The role of family schema and appraisal in family adaptation to crises. In Brubaker T.H. , Family relations: Challenges for the future (pp. 153–177). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • McHale, S., Sloan, J., & Simmeonsson, R. (1986). Relationships of children with autistic, mentally retarded and non-handicapped brothers and sisters. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 16, 399–415.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, L. (1993). Family therapy of brain injury: Syndromes, strategies, and solutions. American Journal of Family Therapy, 21, 111–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moes, D. R., & Frea, W. D. (2000). Using family context to inform intervention planning for the treatment of a child with autism. Journal of Positive Behavioral Intervention, 2, 40–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moos, R.H., & Moos, B. S. (2002). Family Environment Scale (3rd. edition). Menlo Park, CA: Mind Garden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, D. H., & Gorall, D. M. (2003). Circumplex model of marital and family systems. In F. Walsh (Ed.), Normal family processes (3rd ed., pp. 514–547). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, D. H., Gorall, D. M., & Tiesel, J. W. (2005). Faces IV package. Minneapolis, MN: Life Innovations.

    Google Scholar 

  • O‚Neill, R. E., Horner, R. H., Albin, R. W., Sprague, J. R., Storey, K., &Newton, J. S. (1997). Functional assessment and program development for problem behavior: A practical handbook. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, J. M. (2002a). Integrating family resilience and family stress theory. Journal of Marriage and Family, 64, 349–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, J. M. (2002b). Understanding family resilience. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 58, 233–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pianta, R. C., & Walsh, D. J. (1996). High risk children in schools: Constructing sustaining relationships. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, W.H. (1995). Professional understanding of the community: At a loss for words? In P. Adams and K. Nelson, Reinventing human services: Community- and family-centered practice (pp. 245–259). New York: de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheridan, S. M., Cowan, R. J., & Eagle, J. W. (2000). Partnering with parents in educational programming for students with (pp. 307–349) special needs. In Telzrow & C. Tankersley M. , IDEA Amendments of 1997: Practice Guidelines for School-Based Teams. Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheridan, S. M., Eagle, J. W., Cowan, R. J., & Mickelson, W. (2001). The effects of conjoint behavioral consultation: Results of a 4-year investigation. Journal of School Psychology, 39, 361–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheridan, S. M., Eagle, J. W., & Doll, B. J. (2006). An examination of the efficacy of conjoint behavioral consultation with diverse clients. School Psychology Quarterly, 21, 396–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheridan, S. M., Eagle, J. W., & Dowd, S. E. (2005). Families as (pp. 165–179) contexts for children‚s adaptation. In Goldstein and S. R. Brooks, Handbook of resiliency in children. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sheridan, S. M., & Gutkin, T. B. (2000). The ecology of school psychology: Examining and changing our paradigm for the 21st century. School Psychology Review, 29, 485–502.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheridan, S. M., & Kratochwill, T. R. (2008). Conjoint behavioral consultation: Promoting family-school connections and interventions (2nd edition). New York: Springer Science and Business Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheridan, S. M., Kratochwill, T. R., & Bergan, J. R. (1996). Conjoint behavioral consultation: A procedural manual. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheridan, S. M., Kratochwill, T. R., & Elliott, S. N. (1990). Behavioral consultation with parents and teachers: Delivering treatment for socially withdrawn children at home and school. School Psychology Review, 19, 33–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheridan, S. M., Meegan, S., & Eagle, J.W. (2002). Exploring the social context in conjoint behavioral consultation: Linking processes to outcomes. School Psychology Quarterly, 17, 299–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheridan, S. M., & Steck, M. C. (1995). Acceptability of conjoint behavioral consultation: A national survey of school psychologists. School Psychology Review, 24, 633–647.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheridan, S. M., Warnes, E. D., Cowan, R. J., Schemm, A. V., & Clarke, B. L. (2004). Family-centered positive psychology: Focusing on strengths to build student success. Psychology in the Schools, 4, 7–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sloper, P., & Turner, S. (1992). Service needs of families of children with severe physical disability. Child: Care, Health, and Development, 18, 259–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soriano, M., Soriano, F. I., & Jimenez, E. (1994). School violence among culturally diverse populations: Sociocultural and institutional considerations. School Psychology Review, 23, 216–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sue, D. W., & Sue, D. (1999). Counseling the culturally different. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swenson, C. R. (1995). Professional understanding of the community: At a loss for words? In Adams and P. Nelson K. , Reinventing human services: Community- and family-centered practice. (pp. 223–244)New York, NY: Adeline de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turnbull, A. P., & Turnbull, H. R. (1991). Family assessment and family empowerment: An ethical analysis. In Meyer, L. H. Peck, & C. A. Brown L. , Critical issues in the lives of people with severe disabilities (pp. 485–488). Baltimore: Brookes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turnbull, A. P., & Turnbull, H. R. (1997). Families, professionals, and exceptionality: A special partnership (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wade, S., Drotar, D., Taylor, H. G., & Stancin, T. (1995). Assessing the effects of traumatic brain injury on family functioning: Conceptual and methodological issues. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 20, 737–752.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, F. (2003). Family resilience: A framework for clinical practice. Family Process, 42, 1–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, M., Turnbull, A. P., Summers, J. A., Little, T., Poston, D., Mannan, H., et al. (2004). Severity of disability and income as predictors of parents‚ satisfaction with their quality of life during early childhood years. Research and Practice for Persons with Disabilities. Special Issue: Family and Disability, 29, 82–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, R. K., Sheridan, S. M., & Jenson, W. R. (1998). The effects of conjoint behavioral consultation and a structured homework program on math completion and accuracy in junior high students. School Psychology Quarterly, 13, 281–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, L. A. (2005). An evaluation of conjoint behavioral consultation as a model for supporting students with emotional and behavioral difficulties in mainstream classrooms. Emotional and Behavioral Difficulties, 10(2), 119–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ylven, R., Bjorck-Akesson, E., & Granlund, M. (2006). Literature review of positive functioning in families with children with a disability. Journal of Policy and practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 34, 253–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zarski, J. J., DePompei, R., & Zook, A. (1988). Traumatic head injury: Dimensions of family responsivity. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 3, 31–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Eagle, J.W. (2009). The Role of Family and Situational Problems in Understanding and Reducing Impairment. In: Naglieri, J., Goldstein , S. (eds) Assessing Impairment. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-387-87542-2_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics