Abstract
Impairment has a widespread impact on family functioning, routines, activities, and relationships between family members. Families provide an invaluable resource in assessing and addressing the needs of individuals experiencing impairment as well as those of other family members. Impairment manifests itself in many ways, but all forms are contextually relevant. An ecological perspective provides an alternative conceptualization of impairment to a biological, medical model. This framework extends the focus of assessment and intervention beyond the individual to other contexts within which the individual interacts. Two of the most important contexts in which that children interact are the home and school environments. Families have a great deal of knowledge and expertise regarding an individual's level of behavioral, social, and academic functioning in multiple settings.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abidin, R.R. (1995). The Parenting Stress Index professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
Baumrind, D. (1968). Authoritarian vs. authoritative parental control. Adolescence, 3, 255–272.
Bloom, B.L. (1985). A factor analysis of self-report measures of family functioning. Family Process, 24, 225–239.
Brassard, M. R., & Boehm, A. E. (2007). Preschool assessment: Principles and practices. New York: Guilford Press.
Bray, J.H. (1995). Family assessment: Current issues in evaluating families. Family Relations, 44, 469–477.
Breslau, N. (1983). The psychological study of chronically ill and disabled children: Are healthy siblings appropriate controls? Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 11, 379–391.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Chen, D., Downing, J. E., & Peckham-Hardin, K. D. (2002). Working with families of diverse cultural and linguistic backgrounds. In Koegel, L.K. Koegel, &R.L. DunlapG. , Positive behavior support: Including people with difficult behavior in the community (pp. 133–154). Baltimore: Brookes.
Colton, D., & Sheridan, S. M. (1998). Conjoint behavioral consultation and social skills training: Enhancing the play behavior of boys with attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 9, 3–28.
Conoley, J. C., & Sheridan, S. M. (2005). Understanding and implementing school-family interventions after neuropsychological impairment. In Amato, R.C.D‚ Fletcher-Janzen, & E.F. Reynolds C.R. , Handbook of school neuropsychology (pp. 721–737). New York: Wiley.
Crone, D. A., & Horner, R. H. (2003). Building positive behavior support systems in schools: Functional behavior assessment. New York: Guilford Press.
Deal, A. G., Trivette, C. M., & Dunst, C. J. (1988). Family Functioning Style Scale. In Dunst, C. J. Trivette, & C. M. Deal A. G. , Enabling and empowering families: Principles and guidelines for practice (pp. 175–184). Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books.
Dunst, C. J., Trivette, C. M., & Deal, A. G. (1994). Enabling and empowering families. In C. J. Dunst, C. M. Trivette, & A. G. Deal , Supporting and strengthening families: Methods, strategies, and practices (pp. 2–28). Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books.
Epstein, N. B., Baldwin, L., & Bishop, D. S. (1983). The McMaster family assessment device. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 9, 171–180.
Epstein, N., Ryan, C., Bishop, D., Miller, I., & Keitner G. (2003). The McMaster model: A view of healthy functioning. In Walsh F., Normal family processes (3rd ed., pp. 581–607). New York: Guilford Press.
Fox, L., Vaughn, B. J., Wyatte, M. L., Dunlap, G., & Bucy, M. (1997). Parent-professional partnership in behavioral support: A qualitative analysis of one family‚s experience. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 22, 198–207.
Fox, L., Vaughn, B. J., Wyatte, M. L., & Dunlap, G. (2002). What we expect other people to understand: Family perspectives on problem behavior. Exceptional Children, 68, 437–450.
Freer, P., & Watson, T. S. (1999). A comparison of parent and teacher acceptability ratings of behavioral and conjoint behavioral consultation. School Psychology Review, 28, 672–684.
Galloway, J., & Sheridan, S. M. (1994). Implementing scientific practices through case studies: Examples using home-school interventions and consultation. Journal of School Psychology, 32, 385–413.
Gath, A., & Gumley, D. (1987). Retarded children and their siblings. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 28, 715–730.
Gellerstedt, M. E., & Mauksch, L. (1993). Chronic neurologic impairment: A family problem. Family Systems Medicine, 11, 425–431.
Giallo, R., & Gavida-Payne, S. (2006). Child, parent, and family factors as predictors of adjustment for siblings of children with a disability. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 50. 937–948.
Harry, B. (1992). Developing cultural self-awareness: The first step in values clarification for early interventionists. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education,12, 222–250.
Heru, A., & Ryan, C. (2002). Depressive symptoms and family functioning in the caregivers of recently hospitalized patients with chronic/recurrent mood disorders. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 7, 53–60.
Jackson, A., & Haverkamp, D. E. (1991). Family response to traumatic brain injury. Counseling Psychology Quarterly, 4, 355–356.
Katz, J. (1985). The sociopolitical nature of counseling. The Counseling Psychologist, 13, 615–624.
Koegel, L. K., Steibel, D., & Koegel, R. L. (1998). Reducing aggression in children with autism toward infant or toddler siblings. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 23, 111–118.
Lucyshyn, J. M., Albin, R. W., & Nixon, C. D. (1997). Embedding comprehensive behavioral support in family ecology: An experimental, single-case analysis. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 65, 241–251.
Lucyshyn, J. M., Horner, R. H., Dunlap, G., Albin, R. W., & Ben, K. R. (2002). Positive behavior support with families. In Lucyshyn, J.M. Dunlap, & G. Albin R. W. Families and positive behavior support: Addressing problem behavior in family contexts (pp. 3–43). Baltimore: Brookes.
Lucyshyn, J. M., Kayser, A. T., Irvin, L. K., & Blumberg, E. R. (2002). Functional assessment and positive behavior support at home and families: Designing effective and contextually appropriate behavior support plans. In J. M. Lucyshyn, G. Dunlap, & R. W. Albin Families and positive behavior support: Addressing problem behavior in family contexts (pp. 3–43). Baltimore: Brookes.
Mactavish, J., B., MacKay, K. J., Iwasaki, Y., & Betteridge, D. (2007). Family caregivers of individuals with intellectual disability: Perspectives on life quality and the role of vacations. Journal of Leisure Research, 39, 127–155.
McCubbin, H.I., & McCubbin, M.A., & Thompson, A.I. (1993). Resiliency in families: The role of family schema and appraisal in family adaptation to crises. In Brubaker T.H. , Family relations: Challenges for the future (pp. 153–177). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
McHale, S., Sloan, J., & Simmeonsson, R. (1986). Relationships of children with autistic, mentally retarded and non-handicapped brothers and sisters. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 16, 399–415.
Miller, L. (1993). Family therapy of brain injury: Syndromes, strategies, and solutions. American Journal of Family Therapy, 21, 111–121.
Moes, D. R., & Frea, W. D. (2000). Using family context to inform intervention planning for the treatment of a child with autism. Journal of Positive Behavioral Intervention, 2, 40–46.
Moos, R.H., & Moos, B. S. (2002). Family Environment Scale (3rd. edition). Menlo Park, CA: Mind Garden.
Olson, D. H., & Gorall, D. M. (2003). Circumplex model of marital and family systems. In F. Walsh (Ed.), Normal family processes (3rd ed., pp. 514–547). New York: Guilford Press.
Olson, D. H., Gorall, D. M., & Tiesel, J. W. (2005). Faces IV package. Minneapolis, MN: Life Innovations.
O‚Neill, R. E., Horner, R. H., Albin, R. W., Sprague, J. R., Storey, K., &Newton, J. S. (1997). Functional assessment and program development for problem behavior: A practical handbook. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
Patterson, J. M. (2002a). Integrating family resilience and family stress theory. Journal of Marriage and Family, 64, 349–360.
Patterson, J. M. (2002b). Understanding family resilience. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 58, 233–246.
Pianta, R. C., & Walsh, D. J. (1996). High risk children in schools: Constructing sustaining relationships. New York: Routledge.
Quinn, W.H. (1995). Professional understanding of the community: At a loss for words? In P. Adams and K. Nelson, Reinventing human services: Community- and family-centered practice (pp. 245–259). New York: de Gruyter.
Sheridan, S. M., Cowan, R. J., & Eagle, J. W. (2000). Partnering with parents in educational programming for students with (pp. 307–349) special needs. In Telzrow & C. Tankersley M. , IDEA Amendments of 1997: Practice Guidelines for School-Based Teams. Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
Sheridan, S. M., Eagle, J. W., Cowan, R. J., & Mickelson, W. (2001). The effects of conjoint behavioral consultation: Results of a 4-year investigation. Journal of School Psychology, 39, 361–385.
Sheridan, S. M., Eagle, J. W., & Doll, B. J. (2006). An examination of the efficacy of conjoint behavioral consultation with diverse clients. School Psychology Quarterly, 21, 396–417.
Sheridan, S. M., Eagle, J. W., & Dowd, S. E. (2005). Families as (pp. 165–179) contexts for children‚s adaptation. In Goldstein and S. R. Brooks, Handbook of resiliency in children. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
Sheridan, S. M., & Gutkin, T. B. (2000). The ecology of school psychology: Examining and changing our paradigm for the 21st century. School Psychology Review, 29, 485–502.
Sheridan, S. M., & Kratochwill, T. R. (2008). Conjoint behavioral consultation: Promoting family-school connections and interventions (2nd edition). New York: Springer Science and Business Media.
Sheridan, S. M., Kratochwill, T. R., & Bergan, J. R. (1996). Conjoint behavioral consultation: A procedural manual. New York: Plenum.
Sheridan, S. M., Kratochwill, T. R., & Elliott, S. N. (1990). Behavioral consultation with parents and teachers: Delivering treatment for socially withdrawn children at home and school. School Psychology Review, 19, 33–52.
Sheridan, S. M., Meegan, S., & Eagle, J.W. (2002). Exploring the social context in conjoint behavioral consultation: Linking processes to outcomes. School Psychology Quarterly, 17, 299–324.
Sheridan, S. M., & Steck, M. C. (1995). Acceptability of conjoint behavioral consultation: A national survey of school psychologists. School Psychology Review, 24, 633–647.
Sheridan, S. M., Warnes, E. D., Cowan, R. J., Schemm, A. V., & Clarke, B. L. (2004). Family-centered positive psychology: Focusing on strengths to build student success. Psychology in the Schools, 4, 7–17.
Sloper, P., & Turner, S. (1992). Service needs of families of children with severe physical disability. Child: Care, Health, and Development, 18, 259–282.
Soriano, M., Soriano, F. I., & Jimenez, E. (1994). School violence among culturally diverse populations: Sociocultural and institutional considerations. School Psychology Review, 23, 216–235.
Sue, D. W., & Sue, D. (1999). Counseling the culturally different. New York: Wiley.
Swenson, C. R. (1995). Professional understanding of the community: At a loss for words? In Adams and P. Nelson K. , Reinventing human services: Community- and family-centered practice. (pp. 223–244)New York, NY: Adeline de Gruyter.
Turnbull, A. P., & Turnbull, H. R. (1991). Family assessment and family empowerment: An ethical analysis. In Meyer, L. H. Peck, & C. A. Brown L. , Critical issues in the lives of people with severe disabilities (pp. 485–488). Baltimore: Brookes.
Turnbull, A. P., & Turnbull, H. R. (1997). Families, professionals, and exceptionality: A special partnership (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Wade, S., Drotar, D., Taylor, H. G., & Stancin, T. (1995). Assessing the effects of traumatic brain injury on family functioning: Conceptual and methodological issues. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 20, 737–752.
Walsh, F. (2003). Family resilience: A framework for clinical practice. Family Process, 42, 1–18.
Wang, M., Turnbull, A. P., Summers, J. A., Little, T., Poston, D., Mannan, H., et al. (2004). Severity of disability and income as predictors of parents‚ satisfaction with their quality of life during early childhood years. Research and Practice for Persons with Disabilities. Special Issue: Family and Disability, 29, 82–94.
Weiner, R. K., Sheridan, S. M., & Jenson, W. R. (1998). The effects of conjoint behavioral consultation and a structured homework program on math completion and accuracy in junior high students. School Psychology Quarterly, 13, 281–309.
Wilkinson, L. A. (2005). An evaluation of conjoint behavioral consultation as a model for supporting students with emotional and behavioral difficulties in mainstream classrooms. Emotional and Behavioral Difficulties, 10(2), 119–136.
Ylven, R., Bjorck-Akesson, E., & Granlund, M. (2006). Literature review of positive functioning in families with children with a disability. Journal of Policy and practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 34, 253–270.
Zarski, J. J., DePompei, R., & Zook, A. (1988). Traumatic head injury: Dimensions of family responsivity. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 3, 31–41.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Eagle, J.W. (2009). The Role of Family and Situational Problems in Understanding and Reducing Impairment. In: Naglieri, J., Goldstein , S. (eds) Assessing Impairment. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-387-87542-2_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-387-87542-2_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-87541-5
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-87542-2
eBook Packages: Behavioral ScienceBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)