Skip to main content

Duhem, Quine and a New Empiricism

  • Chapter
Knowledge and Necessity

Part of the book series: Royal Institute of Philosophy Lectures

Abstract

As in the case of great books in all branches of philosophy, Pierre Duhem’s Le Théorie Physique, first published in 1906, can be looked to as the progenitor of many different and even conflicting currents in subsequent philosophy of science. On a superficial reading, it seems to be an expression of what later came to be called deductivist and instrumentalist analyses of scientific theory. Duhem’s very definition of physical theory, put forward early in the book, is the quintessence of instrumentalism:

A physical theory is not an explanation. It is a system of mathematical propositions, deduced from a small number of principles, which aim to represent as simply, as completely, and as exactly as possible a set of experimental laws [p. 19].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • N. Chomsky, ‘Quine’s empirical assumptions’, in Synthese (1968) 19, 53.

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Duhem, The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory (Princeton, N.J., 1906; trans. Wiener, Oxford, 1954).

    Google Scholar 

  • P. K. Feyerabend, ‘Explanation, reduction and empiricism’, in Minnesota Studies, III, ed. H. Feigl and G. Maxwell (Minneapolis, 1962) p. 28.

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Grunbaum, Philosophical Problem of Space and Time (New York, 1963).

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Grunbaum** ’The falsifiability of a component of a theoretical system’, in Mind, Matter, and Method, ed. P. K. Feyerabend and G. Maxwell (Minneapolis, 1966) p. 273.

    Google Scholar 

  • N. R. Hanson, Patterns of Discovery (Cambridge, 1958).

    Google Scholar 

  • T. S. Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (Chicago, 1962).

    Google Scholar 

  • K. R. Popper, The Logic of Scientific Discovery (London, 1959).

    Google Scholar 

  • K. R. Popper*** Conjectures and Refutations (London, 1963).

    Google Scholar 

  • W. v. O. Quine, From a Logical Point of View (Cambridge, Mass., 1953).

    Google Scholar 

  • W. v. O. Quine** Word and Object (New York, 1960).

    Google Scholar 

  • W. v. O. Quine** ’Replies’, in Synthese (1968) 19, 264.

    Google Scholar 

  • I. Scheffler, Science and Subjectivity (Indianapolis, 1967).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1970 The Royal Institute of Philosophy

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hesse, M. (1970). Duhem, Quine and a New Empiricism. In: Knowledge and Necessity. Royal Institute of Philosophy Lectures. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-86205-4_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-86205-4_11

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-333-10558-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-86205-4

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics