Skip to main content

The Intermodal Allocation of Flows

  • Chapter
Transport for the Space Economy

Part of the book series: Focal Problems in Geography Series

  • 8 Accesses

Abstract

Even a cursory examination of transport systems reveals that they differ greatly in the proportion of traffic allocated to competing modes. Indeed the proportions vary so widely that it is impossible to make any general description of the patterns which result. Studies of the problem have therefore concentrated upon two or three themes: the identification of factors determining the intermodal split, the ranking of these factors in order of importance, and the construction of theories, formalised as working models, which both accurately reflect the decision making process and produce aggregate patterns consistent with reality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. B. T. Bayliss and S. L. Edwards, Transport for Industry, HMSO, London (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Traders Road Transport Association, Survey of C-licensed Vehicles, London (1959),

    Google Scholar 

  3. and Aims of Industry, Integration in Freight Transport, London (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bayliss and Edwards, op. cit., p. 39.

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. A. Walters, Integration in Freight Transport, Institute of Economic Affairs, Research Monograph 15, London (1968), p. 58.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ibid., pp. 60–1.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ibid., p. 59, and Bayliss and Edwards, op. cit., p. 43.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Price alone is used as a determinant by E. D. Perle, The Demand for Transportation, University of Chicago, Department of Geography, Research Paper no. 95 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  9. M. Beckmann, C. B. McGuire and C. B. Winsten, Studies in the Economics of Transportation, Yale U.P. for Cowles Commission, New Haven (1956), pp. 113–17.

    Google Scholar 

  10. A. G. Wilson, The use of entropy maximising models in the theory of trip distribution, mode split and route split, Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 3 (1969), pp. 108–126.

    Google Scholar 

  11. F. R. Wilson, Journey to Work, Maclaren, London (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  12. R. Gronau, The Value of Time in Passenger Transportation: the demand for air travel, National Bureau for Economic Research, New York (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  13. M. J. Bruton, Introduction to Transportation Planning, Hutchinson, London (1970), chapter 6.

    Google Scholar 

  14. W. Adams, Factors Influencing Mass Transit and Automobile Travel in Urban Areas, as quoted by F. R. Wilson, op. cit.

    Google Scholar 

  15. D. S. Hill and H. C. van Cube, Development of a model forecasting travel mode choice in urban areas, Highway Research Board Record, no. 38 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  16. F. R. Wilson, op. cit., pp. 208–13.

    Google Scholar 

  17. A. G. Wilson, Interregional commodity flows: entropy maximising approaches, Geographical Analysis, 2 (1970), p. 282.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1973 Alan M. Hay

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hay, A. (1973). The Intermodal Allocation of Flows. In: Transport for the Space Economy. Focal Problems in Geography Series. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-86191-0_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics