Skip to main content
  • 13 Accesses

Abstract

Economists normally hold that the only relevant costs and benefits are those that accrue to individuals, and which are a function of the preferences of individuals, which leads to the problem of reckoning these preferences. Preferences are logical constructs and must conform with certain logical rules (including transitivity and a number of others) if they are to be consistently stated.1 They imply a reasoning mind, but what if an individual is capricious or unreasoning and lacks consistent preferences? The short answer of course is that one can only give a man his preferences to the extent that he has any, and the analyst must do his best with the data available.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. A. Downs, Inside Bureaucracy (Boston, 1967).

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. M. Buchanan and G. Tullock, The Calculus of Consent (University of Michigan, 1962) pp. 4, 18,27–30.

    Google Scholar 

  3. B. M. Barry, Sociologists, Economists, and Democracy (London, 1970), chapter 2.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Too familiar to repeat here. See for example: A. K. Sen, Behaviour and the Concept of Preference (London School of Economics, 1973) pp. 10–13.

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. K. Sen, On Economic Inequality (Oxford, 1973) pp. 96–9.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. J. Rawls. A Theory of Justice (Oxford University Press, 1972) pp. 22–7, 183–92.

    Google Scholar 

  7. C. D. Foster, ‘Social Welfare Functions in C.B.A.’, in Operational Research in the Social Services, ed. M. Laurence (London, 1966).

    Google Scholar 

  8. I. D. M. Little, A Critique of Welfare Economics (Oxford University Press, 1950) chapter 10.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ebenezer Howard, Garden Cities of Tomorrow (London, new ed. 1946).

    Google Scholar 

  10. D. L. Foley, Controlling London’s Growth (University of California Press, 1963).

    Google Scholar 

  11. J. N. Jackson, The Urban Future (London, 1972) chapter 8.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Peter Self, Metropolitan Planning (London School of Economics, 1971) chapter 6.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1975 Peter Self

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Self, P. (1975). Techniques and Values. In: Econocrats and the Policy Process. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-86169-9_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics