Abstract
There is no final answer to the debate over cohesion or disjunction in the planning process. The argument for cohesion is normally set in the terminology of comprehensive planning.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes and References
This chapter draws upon a wide range of material in which this debate is pursued. Special reference should be made to the following: D. Braybrooke and C. Lindblom, A Strategy of Decision (New York: The Free Press, 1963).
Y. Dror, Public Policy Re-examined (Scranton, Penn.: Chandler, 1968).
A. Etzioni, The Active Society (New York: The Free Press, 1968).
A. Faludi, Planning Theory (Oxford: Pergamon, 1973).
J. Friend and W. Jessup, Local Government and Strategic Choice (London: Tavistock, 1971).
R. Greenwood and J. D. Stewart (eds), Corporate Planning in Local Government (London: Charles Knight, 1974).
H. A. Simon, Administrative Behaviour (New York: The Free Press (paperback edition), 1965).
J. D. Stewart, The Responsive Local Authority (London: Charles Knight, 1974).
G. Vickers, The Art of Judgment (London: Methuen, 1965).
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1977 Helmuth Heisler, John Carrier, Bleddyn Davies, Neil Fraser, Howard Jones, Peter Kaim-Caudle, Ian Kendall, Thomas McPherson, Della Adam Nevitt, Muriel Nissel, Barbara Rodgers, J. D. Stewart, George F. Thomason
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Stewart, J.D. (1977). Cohesion or Disjunction in the Planning of Public Policy?. In: Heisler, H. (eds) Foundations of Social Administration. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-86159-0_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-86159-0_10
Publisher Name: Palgrave, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-18648-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-86159-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)