Abstract
The precise role which clients play in the process of welfare rationing has yet to be clearly delineated, but it is clear that clients’ initial demands on the social services do play some part in determining the final distribution of welfare benefits. We can identify three separate areas of debate over the impact of client initiated demand on the rationing of welfare. First, writers on welfare issues have attempted to assess the impact of client demand on overall levels of social expenditure. The significance of client initiated demand as opposed to other factors such as the demands of industry in relation to overall social expenditure is extremely difficult to calculate. Since we are mainly concerned with the allocation of welfare benefits to clients rather than with the process of resource allocation to the social services, the relationship between client demand and levels of social expenditure will not be explored in this book. A second, controversial, aspect of client demand is the question whether or not clients over use or abuse the statutory social services. A third important question is whether clients themselves play a part in perpetuating social class inequalities in the distribution of certain welfare goods and services. Before exploring these issues further we should note the difficulties involved in any attempt to isolate, measure or evaluate client initiated demand for social services.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
See B. Showier, ‘Political Economy and Unemployment’ in B. Showier and A. Sinfield (eds), The Workless State (London: Martin Robertson, 1981).
A. Cartwright and R. Anderson, Patients and Their Doctors, Occasional Paper 8 (London: Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 1979) p. 7.
Ibid, p. 11.
J. Fry, ‘The Content of Practice’ in J. Fry (ed.), Trends in General Practice (London: British Medical Journal, 1977) p. 37.
G. Stimson and B. Webb, Going to See the Doctor (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1975) p.21.
M. Foster, ‘The Rationing of Primary Medical Care: A Case Study of Supply and Demand in General Practice’, unpublished MA thesis (Manchester University, 1978).
Ibid, p. 57.
D. Mechanic, ‘Correlates of Frustration Among British General Practitioners’, Journal of Health and Social Behaviour, vol. 11, no. 2 (1970) pp. 87–104.
J. Buckle, Intake Teams (London: Tavistock, 1981) p. 27.
J. Mayer, ‘The Social Factors in Surgery Attendance’, Pulse, 28 May 1977, p. 8.
M. Cooper, Rationing Health Care (London: Croom Helm, 1975) p. 13.
Ibid, p. 14.
S. Rees, Social Work Face to Face (London: Edward Arnold, 1978) p. 36.
Ibid, p. 37.
J. Mayer and N. Timms, The Client Speaks (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1970) p. 53.
Ibid, p. 105.
Ibid, p. 53.
R. M. Moroney, The Family and the State (London: Longman, 1976) p. 45.
T. Cresswell and P. Parker, ‘The Frail who Lead the Frail’, New Society, vol. 20, no. 504 (1972) p. 410.
Child Poverty Action Group, So Who’s ‘Better Off on the Dole, Poverty Fact Sheet (London: Child Poverty Action Group, 1980) p. 12.
A. Laurence, unpublished report summarised in P. Moore, ‘Counter-Culture in a Social Security Office’, New Society, vol. 53, no. 921 (1980) p. 69.
Child Poverty Action Group, So Who’s ‘Better Off on the Dole, p. 13.
Department of Health and Social Security, National Health Service: Twentieth Anniversary Conference (London: HMSO, 1968).
R. Titmuss, ‘Goals of Today’s Welfare State’, in P. Anderson and R. Blackburn (eds), Towards Socialism (London: Fontana, 1965) p. 360.
J. Le Grand, The Strategy for Equality (London: Allen & Unwin, 1982) p. 4.
A. Cochrane, Effectiveness and Efficiency: Random Reflections on Health Services (London: Nuffield Provincial Hospitals Trust, 1972).
P. Townsend and N. Davidson, Inequalities in Health — The Black Report (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1982) p. 88.
Ibid, p. 81.
Ibid, p. 82.
Ibid, p. 88.
R. Titmuss, Commitment to Welfare (London: Allen & Unwin, 1968) p. 67.
K. MacDonald, ‘Time and the Working Class’, unpublished paper presented at the 1976 Conference of the British Sociological Association.
A. Cartwright and M. O’Brien, ‘Social Class Variations in Health’ in M. Stacey (ed.), The Sociology of the NHS, Sociological Review Monograph 22 (Keele: University of Keele, 1976);
I. C. Buchan and I. M. Richardson, Time Study of Consultation in General Practice (Edinburgh: Scottish Home and Health Dept, 1973).
Royal Commission on the National Health Service, Report, Cmnd 7615 (London: HMSO, 1979) p. 89.
P. Townsend and N. Davidson, Inequalities in Health — The Black Report, p. 89.
J. Le Grand, The Strategy for Equality, p. 33.
See M. Backett, ‘Health Services’ in F. Williams (ed.). Why the Poor Pay More London: Macmillan, 1977).
J. Le Grand, The Strategy for Equality, p. 35.
Where, ‘Parental Choice — For How Many?’, Where, no. 136 (1978) pp. 71–2.
Ibid, p. 71.
House of Commons Debates 1978–9, col. 185.
Ibid, col. 366.
R. Boudon, Education, Opportunity and Social Inequality (London: Wiley, 1974).
J. Le Grand, The Strategy for Equality, p. 64.
D. Black, Inequalities in Health (London: DHSS, 1980).
J. Le Grand, The Strategy for Equality, pp. 134–7.
Ibid, ch. 8.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1983 Peggy Foster
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Foster, P. (1983). Client Demand and Welfare Rationing. In: Access to Welfare. Studies in Social Policy. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-86064-7_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-86064-7_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-32120-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-86064-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social & Cultural Studies CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)