Skip to main content

Schutz and Parsons: Problems of Meaning and Subjectivity

  • Chapter
Profiles and Critiques in Social Theory

Part of the book series: Contemporary Social Theory

  • 93 Accesses

Abstract

Even the severest critic of Talcott Parsons must recognise the extraordinary nature of his contributions to social theory over a period of half a century. More than any other single scholar, Parsons has been responsible for introducing an Anglo-Saxon sociological audience to a sophisticated reading of the works of Durkheim and Max Weber — in addition to translating important segments of Weber’s writings. Parsons early on developed a critical stance towards positivism (in a certain sense of that term, at least) and behaviourism, and has always taken a firm stand against anti-theoretical tendencies in American sociology. He has produced a continuing flow of empirically orientated contributions himself, while never deviating from an overall strategy of developing a systematic framework of social theory. This framework was first of all outlined in The Structure of Social Action, originally published in 1937. There are many (including myself) who would regard this formidably long and dense volume as a greater achievement than any other single work or essay collection that Parsons has published subsequently.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Talcott Parsons, The Structure of Social Action (New York: Free Press, 1949) p. 493.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Richard Grathoff, The Theory of Social Action: The Correspondence of Alfred Schutz and Talcott Parsons (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Parsons, The Structure of Social Action, pp. 60–9. Parsons also discusses ‘empiricism’ on pages 69–72. Again he defines this in an unusual, and somewhat obscure way, as ‘a system of theory when it is claimed, explicitly or implicitly, that the categories of the given theoretical system are by themselves adequate to explain all the scientifically important(?) facts about the body of concrete phenomena to which it is applied’ (pp. 69–70). This conception seems to be influenced by Parsons’s indebtedness to A. N. Whitehead, especially in respect to the so-called ‘fallacy of misplaced concreteness’.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ibid, p. 61.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Harold Garfinkel, Studies in Ethnomethodology (Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1967).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1982 Anthony Giddens

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Giddens, A. (1982). Schutz and Parsons: Problems of Meaning and Subjectivity. In: Profiles and Critiques in Social Theory. Contemporary Social Theory. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-86056-2_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics