Skip to main content

Neo-Keynesian Quantity-Constrained Models

  • Chapter
  • 116 Accesses

Abstract

Neo-Keynesian quantity-constrained models1 show the implications for output and employment of trading at non-market-clearing prices. They share with the post-Keynesian approach the rejection of Walrasian equilibrium, though unlike the latter they do not reject the other features of neoclassical methodology. Neo-Keynesians want to obtain Keynesian-type results in models which conform to the neoclassical view that economic agents must be treated as rational maximising decision-makers and that the interdependencies between variables must be studied within a general-equilibrium framework. Neo-Keynesian models contain an explicit choice-theoretic basis for modelling individual agents’ behaviour which is then aggregated to yield macro behavioural relationships.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. R.J. Barro and H.I. Grossman, ‘A General Disequilibrium Model of Unemployment’, American Economic Review, 61 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  2. R. J. Barro and H. I. Grossman, Money, Employment and Inflation (Cambridge University Press, 1976).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. E. Malinvaud, The Theory of Unemployment Reconsidered (Oxford: Blackwell, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  4. E. Malinvaud, Profitability and Unemployment (Oxford: Blackwell, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  5. F. Hahn, ‘Keynesian Economics and General Equilibrium Theory: Reflections on Some Current Debates’, in G. Harcourt (ed.), The Microeconomic Foundations of Macroeconomics (London: Macmillan, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  6. F. Hahn, ‘Monetarism and Economic Theory’, Economica, 47 (February 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  7. F. Hahn, ‘Unemployment from a Theoretical Viewpoint’, Economica, 47 (August 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. Muellbauer and R. Portes, ‘Macroeconomic Models with Quantity Rationing’, Economic Journal, 88 (December 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  9. A. Dixit, ‘The Balance of Trade in a Model of Temporary Equilibrium with Rationing’, Review of Economic Studies, 45 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  10. M. Feldstein, ‘Temporary Layoffs in the Theory of Unemployment’, Journal of Political Economy, 84, 5 (October 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  11. C. Azariadis, ‘Implicit Contracts and Underemployment Equilibria’, Journal of Political Economy, 83 (December 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  12. H. Grossman, ‘Risk Shifting, Layoffs and Seniority’, Journal of Monetary Economics, 4 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  13. H. Grossman, ‘Employment Fluctuations and the Mitigation of Risk’, Economic Inquiry (October 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  14. H. Grossman, ‘Rational Expectations, Business Cycles and Government Behaviour’, in S. Fischer (ed.), Rational Expectations and Economic Policy (University of Chicago Press, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

Further reading

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1982 Rosalind Levačić and Alexander Rebmann

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Levačić, R., Rebmann, A. (1982). Neo-Keynesian Quantity-Constrained Models. In: Macroeconomics. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-86044-9_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics