A Trade Union View of Reproductive Health

  • Sheila McKechnie
Chapter

Abstract

The involvement of trade unions in reproductive health is relatively new. A number of factors are involved.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    TUC (1980). Women Workers: 1980, A report of the TUC Women’s Advisory Committee 1979–80 and report of the 50th TUC Women’s Conference March 1980, TUC, LondonGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Equal Opportunities Commission (1979). Health and Safety Legislation: Should we Distinguish between Men and Women?, Equal Opportunities Commission, LondonGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chenier, N. M. (1982). Reproductive hazards at work, Canadian Advisory Council on the Status of Women, OttawaGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    House of Commons Social Services Committee (1980). Second Report: Perinatal and Neonatal Mortality, Vol. 1, HMSO, LondonGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    TUC (1981). Women’s Health at Risk, TUC, LondonGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    TUC (1982). Collective Bargaining Agreements: Assistance for Working Parents, Policy document available from the TUC on requestGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    McKechnie, S. (1981). Reproductive hazards in employment. ASTMS Medical World, June Sullivan, F. (1981). Work and sex. ASTMS Medical World, September/ October Barlow, S. (1981). Work and sex. ASTMS Medical World, November/ December Papers presented at GMBATU/ASTMS Seminar on Reproductive Hazards at Work, Guys Hospital Medical School, 30 March 1981Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Council on Environmental Quality, USA (1981). Chemical Hazards to Reproduction Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wilson, J. G. (1973). Environment and Birth Defects, Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kalter, H. and Warkany, J. (1983). Congenital malformations: aetiological factors and their role in prevention. New Engl. J, Med., 308, 424–431, 491–497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Townsend, P. and Davidson, N. (1982). Inequalities in Health, Pelican, HarmondsworthGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hemminki, K., et al. (1980). Spontaneous abortions by occupation and social class in Finland. Int. J. Epidemiol., 9, 149–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Office of Population Censuses and Surveys (1982). Congenital Malformations and Parents’ Occupation, OPCS Monitor MB3 82/1Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Erickson, J. D., et al (1979). Parental occupation and birth defects: a preliminary report. Contrib. Epidemiol Biostat., 1, 107–117Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hemminki, K., et al. (1983). Spontaneous abortions in an industrialised community in Finland. Am. J. Publ. Hlth, 73, 32–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Elwood, J. M. and Elwood, J. H. (1982). International variation in the prevalence at birth of anencephalus in relation to maternal factors. Int. J. Epidemiol, 11, 132–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Barlow, S. and Sullivan, F. (1982). Reproductive Hazards of Industrial Chemicals, Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hemminki, K. (1980). Occupational chemicals tested for teratogenicity. Int. Arch. Occup. Environ. Hlth, 47, 191–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    White, C. G., et al (1981). Extrapolation Models in Teratogenesis (Final Report for Experiment 281), NCTR, Jefferson, Ark.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Vanek, J. (1974). Time spent in housework. Sci. Am., 231, 116–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    McDowall, M., et al (1981). Employment during pregnancy and infant mortality. Pop. Trends, 26, 12–15Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Chamberlain, G. and Garcia, J. (1983). Pregnant women at work. Lancet, 1, 228–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Saurel, M. J. and Kaminski, M. (1983). Pregnant women at work (Letter). Lancet, i, 475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Health and Safety Commission (1980). Control of Lead at Work: Approved Code of Practice, HMSO, LondonGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    US Department of Labor Occupational Safety and Health Administration (1978). Occupational exposure to lead. Fed. Reg., 43, 52952–53014Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lacranjan, I., et al. (1975). Reproductive ability of workmen occupationally exposed to lead. Arch. Environ. Hlth, 30, 396–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Vaisman, A. I. (1967). Working conditions in surgery and their effect on the health of anaesthetists. Exp. Khir. Anesthesiol., 3, 44–49Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Edling, C. (1980). Anaesthetic gases as an occupational hazard — a review. Scand. J. Work Environ. Hlth, 6, 85–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Department of Health and Social Security (1976). Pollution of Operating Departments, etc., by Anaesthetic Gases, HC (76) 38, DHSS, LondonGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Anon. (1978). Counselling on the hazards of pregnancy in operating theatre staff. Anaesthesia, 33, 96–97Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Cohen, E. N., Brown, B. W., et al. (1980). Occupational disease in dentistry and chronic exposure to trace anaesthetic gases. J. Am. Dent. Assoc., 101, 21–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Anon. (1981). Protecting the Unborn Child — A Precautionary Policy at Ciba-Geigy (Health and Safety Information Bulletin No. 66), Industrial Relations Review and Report, p. 3Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Krausse, L. A. (1979). [Director of Environmental Hygiene and Toxicology, Olin Corporation]. In National Safety News, FebruaryGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Page, V. (1981). Freight Hire (Tank Haulage) Ltd, Health and Safety Information Bulletin No. 62, Industrial Relations Review and ReportGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Women’s Occupational Health Resource Centre News, 5, No. 1, February/ March (1983)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Royal Society of Medicine 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sheila McKechnie

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations