Abstract
More than a generation has elapsed since scholars and journalists first began to study democratic elections seriously. But, rather surprisingly, little attempt has yet been made to investigate in detail the motives and conduct of politicians as they set about trying to influence voters. The problem of electoral strategy has been neglected. No scholarly literature on the subject exists, and books like Theodore H. White’s The Making of the President 1960 discuss the problem only briefly and in passing.1 The reason for this neglect is not immediately obvious. Students may have been deterred by the impossibility of gauging accurately the impact of politicians’ actions; they may also have despaired of finding out enough about the inner workings of campaign decision-making. Both of these problems are real ones, and the present authors are acutely conscious of them. Nevertheless, we have tried in this section of the book to provide some account of how electoral strategy was made in the months leading up to the 1964 campaign. This chapter deals briefly with a number of neglected aspects of electioneering; the next three deal in turn with each of the national parties. Our conclusions are necessarily tentative; often we found that the participants themselves were none too sure what had happened.2
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Of course, in the nature of the case, writers concerned mainly with other problems have had things to say about strategy. See Chapter III (‘The Projection of Party Images’) in British General Election of 1959; Charles A. H. Thomson and Frances M. Shattuck, The 1956 Presidential Campaign, Brookings Institution, Washington, D.C., 1960;
Stanley Kelley, Jr., ‘The Presidential Campaign’ in Paul T. David ed., The Presidential Election and Transition 1960–61, Brookings Institution, Washington, D.C., 1961;
Ithiel de Sola Pool, Robert P. Abelson, and Samuel P. Popkin, Candidates, Issues and Strategies, a Computer Simulation of the 1960 Presidential Election, M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1964; and,
Nelson W. Polsby and Aaron B. Wildavsky, Presidential Elections, Strategies of American Electoral Politics, Charles Scribner’s, New York, 1964. The last named books, despite their titles, devote relatively little attention to posing the problem of strategy and analysing it.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1965 D. E. Butler and Anthony King
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Butler, D.E., King, A. (1965). Preliminary Reflections. In: The British General Election of 1964. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-81741-2_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-81741-2_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-81743-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-81741-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)