Abstract
That was a profound maxim of Hume, when inquiring into the value or the real existence of an idea to seek for the impression to which the idea corresponded. In more general language it is the maxim to seek the empirical basis of our ideas. It is true that Hume himself overlooked in experience facts which were in the language of Plato’s Republic rolling about before his feet; and hence failing to find in experience any impression of the self or of causality, he was compelled to refer the ideas of self or causality to the imagination, though in the case of self, for instance, we can see that while he noticed the substantive conditions he overlooked the transitive ones, and missed the essential continuity of mind against which the perceptions are merely standing out in relief. A thorough — going empiricism accepts his formula, but having no prejudice in favour of the separate and distinct existences which attract our attention, insists that in surveying experience no items shall be omitted from the inventory.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Copyright information
© 1966 Macmillan & Co. Ltd. and Dover Publications, Inc.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Alexander, S. (1966). Relations in Space and Time. In: Space, Time, and Deity. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-81688-0_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-81688-0_7
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-81690-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-81688-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)