Skip to main content

Abstract

Surprise that the poor are still poor after two decades of rapid growth has become a constant refrain, but development theorists have always maintained that growth is an inegalitarian process. This was so in the classical models of Smith, Ricardo and Marx. Theorists since the Second World War approached the subject differently, via the behaviour of different sectors of the economy, but reached the same conclusion. If anything surprises, it must be the surprise.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Ohkawa, K. and Rosovsky, H. Japanese Economic Growth, Stanford, 1973, pages 168–9.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1976 Alec Cairncross and Mohinder Puri

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lewis, W.A. (1976). Development and Distribution. In: Cairncross, A., Puri, M. (eds) Employment, Income Distribution and Development Strategy: Problems of the Developing Countries. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-81529-6_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-81529-6_3

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-81531-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-81529-6

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics