Skip to main content
  • 26 Accesses

Abstract

The question of the distribution of the gains from foreign investment has become ever more important since Hans Singer first brought the subject to the forefront of development literature.2 Analysis of the ‘nineteenth-century pattern’ of foreign investment in raw materials has been succeeded by appraisal of the role of private foreign capital in the process of import-substitution industrialisation. Now the third phase of private overseas investment is beginning with export-substitution — the promotion of non-traditional exports of processed primary products, semi-manufactures, and manufactures. This paper analyses the potential impact of this type of foreign investment, especially when it results from the activities of multinational enterprises.

I am especially indebted to the writings of — and conversations with — Max Corden and Paul Streeten. (They may, however, still have to re-educate me on some differences.) Portions of this paper were formulated during the tenure of a research grant from the Rockefeller Foundation and written while I enjoyed the hospitality of Queen Elizabeth House, Oxford.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Hans Singer, ‘The Distribution of Gains between Investing and Borrowing Countries’, American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings (May 1950) pp. 473–85.

    Google Scholar 

  2. This analysis is reviewed in G. M. Meier, International Economics of Development (1968) ch. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  3. See G. M. Meier, ‘UNCTAD Proposals for International Economic Reform’, Stanford Law Review (June 1967) pp. 1173–216.

    Google Scholar 

  4. John Sheahan, ‘Trade and Employment: Industrial Exports Compared to Import Substitution in Mexico’ (Williams College Research Center for Development Economics, Research Memorandum 43, 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  5. For a more detailed listing of categories of labour-intensive manufactures from LDCs, see Asian Development Bank, South-east Asia’s Economy in the 1970s (1971) pp. 293–5, 303–6; G. K. Helleiner, ‘Manufactured Exports from Less Developed Countries and Multinational Firms’, Economic Journal (March 1973) pp. 21–47;

    Google Scholar 

  6. Helleiner, ‘Manufacturing for Export, Multinational Firms and Economic Development’, World Development (July 1973) pp. 13–22.

    Google Scholar 

  7. This is elaborated by Seev Hirsch, ‘Hypotheses Regarding Trade between Developing and Industrial Countries’, in H. Giersch (ed.), The International Division of Labour: Problems and Prospects (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hollis Chenery and Helen Hughes, ‘The International Division of Labour: The Case of Industry’ (IBRD — IDA Economic Staff Working Paper no. 123, 28 January 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  9. See C. Michaloupoulos, ‘Growth of Exports and Income in the Developing World’, AID Discussion Paper no. 28 (November 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Constantine Vaitsos, ‘Employment Effects of Foreign Direct Investments in Developing Countries’, New Delhi Conference on Technology and Employment (March 1973) mimeographed, pp. 29–30.

    Google Scholar 

  11. See UNCTAD, Methods of Evaluating the Economic Effects of Private Foreign Investment (Report by A. K. Sen, 20 August 1971) p. 18.

    Google Scholar 

  12. H. G. Johnson, ‘Economic Benefits of the Multinational Enterprise’, in Nationalism and the Multinational Enterprise, ed. H. R. Hale et al. (1973) p. 169.

    Google Scholar 

  13. R. E. Baldwin, ‘International Trade in Inputs and Outputs’, American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings (May 1972) p. 433.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Thomas Horst, ‘The Theory of the Multinational Firm: Optimal Behaviour under Different Tariff and Tax Rates’, Journal of Political Economy (Sept–Oct 1971) p. 84. See also the analysis presented by W. M. Corden, ‘The Multinational Corporation and International Trade Theory’, in John Dunning (ed.), The Multinational Corporation and Economic Analysis (1974), section IV.

    Google Scholar 

  15. A full-scale argument against the adverse effects of the transfer pricing mechanism is presented by Constantine Vaitsos, Intercountry Income Distribution and Transnational Enterprises (1974) ch. VI. See also

    Google Scholar 

  16. S. Lall, ‘Determinants and Implications of Transfer Pricing by International Firms’, Bulletin of the Oxford Institute of Economics and Statistics (Aug 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  17. For the case of this result in the bauxite-alumina-aluminium industry, see G. M. Meier, Problems of Co-operation for Development (1974) pp. 157–8.

    Google Scholar 

  18. W. M. Corden, Trade Policy and Economic Welfare (1974) pp. 339–40, 345–7, 355–64;

    Google Scholar 

  19. Vaitsos, Intercountry Income Distribution and Transnational Enterprises (1974) pp. 21–4.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1976 Alec Cairncross and Mohinder Puri

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Meier, G.M. (1976). Export Substitution and Multinational Enterprises. In: Cairncross, A., Puri, M. (eds) Employment, Income Distribution and Development Strategy: Problems of the Developing Countries. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-81529-6_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-81529-6_10

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-81531-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-81529-6

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics