Abstract
Ascription of psychological predicates involves reference to the beliefs, values and purposes of the agent. Thus psychological knowledge is founded on the agent’s avowals, whereby he exercises a power, bestowed on him by his fellow agents who recognise his privileged authority to establish by declaration the significance, for him, of what is happening to him and what he is doing in response. In so avowing, to himself or to others, he declares his reasons in terms of which his actions can be understood and evaluated. He ‘explains himself’, to himself as well as to others. It follows that, to be a psychological subject, i.e. a rational agent, one must be capable of self-consciousness ; one must have a ‘self’ to explain. What kind of creature is capable of such agency, and what kind of entity is the ‘self’ he must have and be aware of? We call such an agent a person. What then is it to be a person, and what is it to have a self?
‘… only of a living human being and what resembles (behaves like) a living human being can one say: it has sensations; it sees; is blind; hears; is deaf; is conscious or unconscious’ — Wittgenstein, Philosophical Investigations
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
A. J. Ayer, The Concept of a Person and other Essays (New York: St Martin’s Press, 1963) p. 95: ‘But what exactly is meant here by saying that a criterion is logically adequate? Not that the evidence entails the conclusion, for in that case we should not stop short of physicalism. Not that the evidence provides sufficient empirical support for the conclusion, for then the reasoning is inductive; we are back with the argument from analogy. What is envisaged is something between the two but what can this be? What other possibility remains?’
R. Carnap, ‘Testability and Meaning’, Philosophy of Science, 3 (1963) p 1 .
R. M. Hare, The Language of Morals (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1952) ch. 11
W. B. Gallie, ‘Essentially Contested Conceps’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 56 (1956).
Cf. A. C. Danto, ‘Human Nature and Natural Law’, in Law and Philosop hy, ed. S. Hook (New York: University Press, 1964).
Shoemaker, op. cit.; T. Penelhum, Survival and Disembodied Existence (New York: Humanities Press, 1970).
R. D. Laing, ‘Ontological Insecurity’, in Psychoanalysis and Existential Philosophy, éd. H. M. Ruitenbeek (New York: Dutton, 1962).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1977 Raziel Abelson
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Abelson, R. (1977). Person and Self. In: Persons. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-81496-1_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-81496-1_6
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-81498-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-81496-1
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)