Skip to main content

Cause and Reason

  • Chapter
Persons

Abstract

Having found, in avowals and performatives, an irruption into the natural world by human agents that must be incompletely determined, if its author is to have incorrigible authority, the question arises: does this entail that human actions are causally undetermined as well, and, if so, are they therefore inexplicable?1 Our answer to the first question will be affirmative and our answer to the second negative. I suspect that the aversion most philosophers have to indeterminism is due to their mistaken fear that it entails an affirmative answer to the second question. I shall try to allay that fear.

‘But why do you say that we felt a causal connexion? … One might rather say, I feel that the letters are the reason why I read such-and-such. For if someone asks me “Why do you read such-and-such?” — I justify my reading by the letters which are there’ — Wittgenstein, Philosophical Investigations

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. W. Dray, Laws and Explanation in History (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1957) pp. 150–5.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cf. D. Davidson, ‘Actions, Reasons and Causes’, in Journal of Philosophy, 60, no. 23 (1963) pp. 685–700

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. R. Brandt and J. Kim, ‘Wants as Explanation of Actions’, Journal of Philosophy, 60, no. 15 (1963) pp. 425–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. G. G. Hempel, ‘Reasons and Covering Laws in Historical Explanation’, in Philosophy and History, éd. S. Hook (New York: New York University Press, 1963) pp. 143–63

    Google Scholar 

  5. B. Goldberg, ‘Can a Desire be a Cause?’, in Analysis, 25, no. 3 (1965) pp. 70–2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. B. Berofsky, ‘Determinism and the Concept of a Person’, in Journal of Philosophy, 61 (1964) pp. 461–75 (esp. p. 474)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. W. D. Gean, ‘Reasons and Causes’, in Review of Metaphysics, 19, no. 4 (1966) pp. 667–88

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. Margolis, Psychotherapy and Morality (New York: Random House, 1966) ch. 4

    Google Scholar 

  9. A. Kaplan, The Conduct of Inquiry (San Francisco: Chandler, 1964) pp. 115–25

    Google Scholar 

  10. A. C. Maclntyre, ‘The Antecedents of Action’, in British Analytical Philosophy, ed. B. Williams and A. Montefiore (New York: Humanities Press; London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1966) pp. 205–25.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1977 Raziel Abelson

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Abelson, R. (1977). Cause and Reason. In: Persons. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-81496-1_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-81496-1_3

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-81498-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-81496-1

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics