Advertisement

The Accuracy of Forging Load Estimation in Drop Forging

  • A. Thomas
  • I. Bannister
Chapter

Summary

Methods proposed for estimating forging loads have been reviewed and their accuracy determined by comparing calculated loads with those measured on forging presses.

None of the methods considered was consistently accurate; the better ones typically gave about one fifth of all estimates within ± 10% of the measured load, one third to one half within ± 25% and three quarters within ± 50%.

Two new statistical methods have been developed which give a useful, if unspectacular improvement in accuracy. Both are simple to apply and easily usable on the shop floor.

The methods were developed from data obtained during the forging of mild steel and low carbon carburising steels, but a table is given which allows load estimation for all commonly forged engineering steels.

The methods also allow the influence of forging temperature and flash land design on forging load to be estimated.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    E SIEBEL The plastic forming of metals. Steel October l6-May 7 1933–34.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    W SCHROEDER and D A WEBSTER Press forging thin sections. Journal of Applied Mechanics, September 1949.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    J A SCHEY Principles of forging design IITRI review for American Iron and Steel Industry.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    A GELEJI Forge equipment, rolling mills and accessories. Akademiai Budapest 1967.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    A REBEL’SKII Technical Handbook on forging and drop forging. Moscow 1959Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Trade literature from H LINDEMANN of Dusseldorf.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    S A BALOGUN Die loads and stresses in press forging. Ph D Thesis, University of Aston in Birmingham, 1971.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    F NEUBERGER and S PANNASCH Werkstoffverbrauch beim Gesenkschmieden von Stahl. Fertigungstechnik u Betrieb 12 1962.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    F NEUBERGER Bericht Nr b1 der Forschungsstelle Gesenkschmieden Hannover.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    J FOSTER The high speed mechanical forging press. Metal treatment and drop forging Dec. 1963.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    R L DIETRICH and G ANSELL Calculation of press forging pressures. Trans. ASM 38 1947.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    T A DEAN The mechanics of flash in drop forging. To be published.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    L TOT Determination of maximum load in closed die forging. Act Tech. Acad. Hungarica 54 1966.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    S K BISWAS and B W ROOKS Application of a modular approach to estimate load and energy in closed die forging. Proc. 15th MTDR conference, Birmingham September 1974.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    T ALTAN The use of analytical methods in predicting loads and stresses in closed die forging 1st report Battelle Mem. Inst. 1969.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    R P McDERMOTT An elemental upper bound technique for general use in forging analysis. Proc. 15th MTDR conference, Birmingham, September 1974.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    H KUDO An upper bound approach to plane strain forging and extrusion. Journal of Mech. Science 1 1960.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Birmingham 1977

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Thomas
    • 1
  • I. Bannister
    • 1
  1. 1.Drop Forging Research AssociationSheffieldUK

Personalised recommendations