Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Child and His Family

  • Chapter
Psychological Problems of the Child and His Family

  • 24 Accesses

Abstract

Until recently (the mid-1950s) psychiatrists rarely treated the families of their patients. Until that time, any intensive and direct involvement with families was seen at least as undesirable, if not as incompatible with good psychiatric practice. The reasons for this lay in the fear that family contacts would undermine the patient’s trust in the psychiatrist, as well as complicate and contaminate the doctor-patient relationship, which plays such a key role in successful psychotherapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Recommended for Further Reading

  1. ACKERMAN, N. W. The Psychodynamics of Family Life. New York, Basic Books, 1958. —the original, definitive textbook in the area of family theory.

    Google Scholar 

  2. ACKERMAN, N. W. Treating the Troubled Family. New York, Basic Books, 1966. —a more recent work directed more towards issues of therapy than towards basic family theory.

    Google Scholar 

  3. ADAMS, P. L. “Functions of the Lower-Class Partial Family”. Amer. J. Psychiat. 730: 200–03, 1973. —clear description of effects of social class on family function. Compares complete and partial (i.e. fatherless) lower-class families as to physical health, social control, status, acceptance of the prevailing culture by the children, emotional maintenance.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. BANK, S., and KAHN, M. D. “Sisterhood-Brotherhood Is Powerful: Sibling Sub-Systems and Family Therapy”. Fam. Process. 14: 311–38, 1975. —many patterns of family behaviour and aspects of individual development result from autonomous activities within the sibling subsystem. Suggests that understanding sibling sub-system structure and dynamics can lead to more flexible therapeutic interventions.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. BARTEN, H. H., and BARTEN, S. S. Children and Their Parents in Brief Therapy. New York, Behavioral Publications, 1973. —illustrates how to “think deeply but act superficially” in dealing with the family in crisis.

    Google Scholar 

  6. BATESON, G., JACKSON, D. D., HALEY, J.; and WEAKLAND, J. “Toward a Theory of Schizophrenia”. Behav. Sci. 1: 251–64, 1956. —a classic paper introducing the concept of the “double bind” and hypothesizing its role in the development of schizophrenic symptoms.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. BOWEN, M. “Family Therapy after Twenty Years”, in Freedman, D. X., and Dyrud, J. E., eds., American Handbook of Psychiatry. Vol. 5: Treatment, pp. 367–92. 2nd ed., New York, Basic Books, 1975. —a current review of the field by a pioneer in the area.

    Google Scholar 

  8. BOYD, E.; CLARK, J.; KEMPLER, H.; JOHANNET, P.; LEONARD B.; and McPHERSON, P. “Teaching Interpersonal Communication to Troubled Families”. Tarn. Process. 13: 317–36, 1974. —describes an approach to family intervention directed at ways in which information is exchanged in troubled families.

    Google Scholar 

  9. DOHEN, C. I., and DORWIN, J. “An Application of Balance Theory to Family Treatment”. Fam. Process. 14: 469–79, 1975. —reviews Heider’s Balance Theory and demonstrates its application to the diagnosis and treatment of family dysfunction.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. EPSTEIN, N. B. “Family Psychiatry: Comments on Theory, Therapeutic Technique, and Clinical Investigation”. Paper presented at Conference on Multiproblem Families sponsored by Laidlaw Foundation, 60 St. Clair Avenue East, Toronto, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  11. EPSTEIN, N. B.; RAKOFF, V.; and SIGAL, J. J. “Families Categories Schema”. Monograph prepared by the above authors and the Family Research Group of the Department of Psychiatry, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, in collaboration with the McGill University Human Development Study; revised 1968. —a systematic approach to the analysing and classifying of patterns of behaviour, relationships and communication within the family system.

    Google Scholar 

  12. EPSTEIN, N.B., and BISHOP, D.S. “Family Therapy: State of the Art”. Canad. Psychiat. Assoc. J. 18: 175–83, 1973. —a second review of the area by a practitioner and researcher of twenty years’ experience.

    Google Scholar 

  13. FORD, F. R., and HERRICK, J. “Family Rules: Family Life Styles”. Amer. J. Orthopsychiat. 44: 61–69, 1974. —describes five main “rules” or “life-styles” that can be inferred from a family’s repetitive behaviour, suggesting how a therapist can help by renegotiating family rules.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Croup for the Advancement of Psychiatry. The Field of Family Therapy. gap Report, no. 78, 1970. —a comprehensive review of the field.

    Google Scholar 

  15. HALEY, J. “The Art of Being a Failure as a Therapist”. Amer. J. Orthopsychiat. 39: 691–95, 1972. —witty and informative.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. HALEY, J., and HOFFMAN, L. Techniques of Family Therapy. New York, Basic Books, 1967. —interviews with five experienced family therapists discussing the work they do and the strategy governing their intervention. Verbatim transcripts of actual therapy sessions are included.

    Google Scholar 

  17. HUBBELL, R. D.; BYRNE, M. C.; and STACHOWIAK, J. “Aspects of Communication in Families with Young Children”. Fam. Process. 13: 215–24, 1974. —describes a study of interaction in sixteen four-person families, each with one child three or four years old and another age six or seven.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. JACKSON, D. D. “Family Interaction, Family Homeostasis, and Some Implications for Conjoint Family Psychotherapy”, in Masserman, J. H., ed., Individual and Familial Dynamics, pp. 122–41, New York, Grune and Stratton, 1959. —an early formulation of the concept of family homeostasis by one of the earliest practitioners of family therapy.

    Google Scholar 

  19. JACKSON, D. D.; BEAVIN, J. H.; and WATZLAWICK, P. Pragmatics of Human Communication. New York, W. W. Norton, 1967. —a technical but authoritative introduction to communication within the family system.

    Google Scholar 

  20. LANGSLEY, D. G., and KAPLAN, D.M. The Treatment of Families in Crisis. New York, Grune and Stratton, 1968. —a guide to understanding and management of the family in crisis.

    Google Scholar 

  21. LIBERMAN, R. “Behavioral Approaches to Family and Couple Therapy”. Amer. J. Orthopsychiat. 40: 106–18, 1970. —suggests that the key to success in family therapy lies in changing the ways members respond to each other. Case examples illustrate this behavioural approach to intervention.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. LIDZ, T.; CORNEUSON, A. R.; FLECK, S.; and TERRY, D. “The Intrafamilial Environment of Schizophrenic Patients. 2: Marital Schism and Marital Skew”. Amer. J. Psychiat: 114: 241–48, 1957. —an early paper, one of a series which, by focusing on the family environment of schizophrenics, interested others in the family as a unit of psychopathology. The concepts of “schism” and “skew” are still useful to anyone working with marital couples.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. McPHERSON, S. R.; BRACKELMANNS, W. E.; and NEWMAN, L.E., “Stages in the Family Therapy of Adolescents”. Fam. Process. 13: 77–94, 1974. —outlines the opportunity that crises occurring in the course of family therapy may present for change and growth.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. MINUCHIN, S. Families and Family Therapy. Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press, 1974. —a comprehensive description of a form of family therapy concentrating on change-producing and preventive interventions. A must for the serious student of family therapy.

    Google Scholar 

  25. MINUCHIN, S.; MONTALVO, B.; GUERNEY, B. G.; ROSMAN, B. L.; and SHUMER, F. Families of the Slums: An Exploration of Their Structure and Treatment. New York, Basic Books, 1967. —stresses the influence of the slum environment on family structure and functioning.

    Google Scholar 

  26. RUSSELL, A. “Late Psychosocial Consequences in Concentration Camp Survivor Families”. Amer. J. Orthopsychiat. 44: 611–19, 1974. —this study of the treatment of thirty-four concentration-camp survivor families in family therapy is of particular interest because of the effects of a traumatic experience on the second and third generation.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. SANDER, F. M., and BEELS, C. C. “A Didactic Course for Family Therapy Trainees”. Fam. Process. 9: 411–23, 1970. —describes the rationale, procedures, and reading materials used in a didactic course included in a training program for family therapists. Emphasizes the variety of treatment approaches.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. SATIR, V. Conjoint Family Therapy. Rev. ed. Palo Alto, Calif., Science and Behavior Books, 1967. —written mainly in point form, this small but useful book is a good introduction to understanding the family as a social system in equilibrium. The chapter on the inclusion of children is particularly helpful (pp. 136–59).

    Google Scholar 

  29. SCHEINFELD, D. R.; BOWLES, D.; TUCK, S., Jr.; and DOLD, R. “Parents’ Values, Family Networks, and Family Development: Working with Disadvantaged Families”. Amer. J. Orthopsychiat. 40: 413–25, 1970. —extensive report and evaluation of a system for working with disadvantaged families whose pre-school children show signs of slow development.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. SKYNNER, A. C. R. Systems of Family and Marital Psychotherapy. New York, Brunner/Mazel, 1976. —a fine, comprehensive introductory textbook, discussing and illustrating a variety of theoretical approaches, techniques, and procedures.

    Google Scholar 

  31. SPIEGEL, J. P. “The Resolution of Role Conflict within the Family”, in Bell, N. W., and Vogel, E. G., eds., A Modern Introduction to the Family, 391–411. New York, Free Press, 1968. —a useful discussion of family roles and the part that the resolution of role conflict can play in family therapy.

    Google Scholar 

  32. STANTON, M. D. “Family Therapy Training: Academic and Internship Opportunities for Psychologists”. Fam. Process. 14: 433–40, 1975. —provides information on both university departments of psychology and psychology internship facilities that include family therapy training in their programs.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. STEINHAUER, P. D., “Reflections on Criteria for Selection and Prognosis in Family Therapy”. Canad. Psychiat. Assoc. J. 13: 317–22, 1968. —one of the early attempts to define criteria for the more selective use of family therapy as a treatment technique.

    Google Scholar 

  34. VAN DER VEEN, F., and NOVAK, A. L. “The Family Concept of the Disturbed Child: A Replication Study”. Amer. J. Orthopsychiat. 44: 763–72, 1974. —discusses a study that confirms the close association between theories of family pathology and childhood disturbance, shows how the family’s concept of the identified patient serves the purpose of the family as a system.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. WATZLAWICK, P. “A Review of the Double Bind Theory”. Fam. Process. 2: 132–53, 1963. —reassesses and reviews the “double bind” theory.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. WYNNE, L. C., and SINGER, M. T. “Thought Disorder and Family Relations of Schizophrenics”. Arch. Gen. Psychiat. 9: 191–98, 1963. —one of the early papers exploring the nature and significance of the family environment on the symptoms of young adult schizophrenics.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Paul D. Steinhauer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Canada

    Paul D. Steinhauer (Associate Professor and Director of Training in Child Psychiatry, Senior Staff Psychiatrist) & Quentin Rae-Grant (Professor of Child Psychiatry, Psychiatrist-in-Chief) (Associate Professor and Director of Training in Child Psychiatry, Senior Staff Psychiatrist) &  (Professor of Child Psychiatry, Psychiatrist-in-Chief)

  2. Hospital for Sick Children, Canada

    Paul D. Steinhauer (Associate Professor and Director of Training in Child Psychiatry, Senior Staff Psychiatrist) & Quentin Rae-Grant (Professor of Child Psychiatry, Psychiatrist-in-Chief) (Associate Professor and Director of Training in Child Psychiatry, Senior Staff Psychiatrist) &  (Professor of Child Psychiatry, Psychiatrist-in-Chief)

Copyright information

© 1977 Macmillan Publishers Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Steinhauer, P.D. (1977). The Child and His Family. In: Steinhauer, P.D., Rae-Grant, Q. (eds) Psychological Problems of the Child and His Family. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-81464-0_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation