Electrochemical Effects on Shape Reproduction in Electrochemical Machining

  • C. N. Larsson
  • K. Muzaffaruddin


There have been many attempts to calculate the shape produced by an electrode during electrochemical machining but few have made allowance for the variability of current efficiency and polarization with current density.

The effect of these parameters has been considered theoretically for the experimentally simple but sensitive case of a spike formed when using a tubular drill. Comparison of theoretical and practical results for NaCI, Na NO3, Na CIO3 and Na SCN when machining stainless steel shows that both efficiency and polarfcation make an important contribution to shaping performance. The novel electrolyte sodium thiocyanate has been found to give very good shape reproduction with stainless steel.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    H. TIPTON, Determination of Tool Shape for ECM; Machinery and Production Engineering 48–56, Feb. 1968.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Y. G TSUEI and R.H. NILSON, Int. J. Mach. Tool Des. Res. 17, 168 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    W. KONIG, Annals of Cirp 25, 83, 1977Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    D.E. COLLETT, R.C. HEWSON-BROWNE and D.W. WINDLE, J.Eng.Math. 4, 29 (1970)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    D.E. COLLETT, R.C. HEWSON-BROWNE and D.W. WINDLE, J.Eng.Math. 5, 233 (1970)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    C.N. LARSSON, PhD Thesis Lanchester College Coventry (1968).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    P.A. BROOK and Q. IQBAL, J Electrochem Soc. 116, 1458(1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    H. TIPTON, Electrochemical Machining, Eds. A.E. DeBarr and D.A. Oliver, Macdonald, London (1968).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    W. KONlG and H. DEGEHARDT, Fundamentals of ECM, Ed C Fausf, Electrochemical Society, Princeton USA (1971)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    T.P. HOAR and G.P. ROTHWELL, Electrochemîca Acta 9, 135(1964)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    C.N. LARSSON and T. PYLE, Fundamentals of ECM, Ed. C Faust, Electrochemical Society, Princeton, USA (1971)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    H. TIPTON, Machine Tool Industry Research Association, private communicationGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    C.N. LARSSON and E.M. BAXTER, Tool Damage by Sparking in ECM, MTDR Conference, London 1977.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    K. MUZAFFARUDDIN, Electrolyte Development for Electrochemical Machining of Titanium Alloys and Steels, PhD Thesis, University of Strathclyde 1975.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    J. FLEURY, ECM of Drop Forging Dies, Drop Forging Research Association, 1972.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Manchester Institute of Science and Technology 1979

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. N. Larsson
    • 1
  • K. Muzaffaruddin
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Production Management and Manufacturing TechnologyUniversity of StrathclydeGlasgowUK
  2. 2.College of EngineeringKing Abdulaziz UniversityJeddaSaudi Arabia

Personalised recommendations