Advertisement

Tool Design and Progressive Shape Formations During Electrochemical Broaching

  • S. R. Ghabrial
  • A. A. Nasser
  • S. J. Ebeid
  • A. A. Mahboud
Chapter

Summary

The subject matter of this investigation involves the definition of progressive shape formations for a certain arbitrary tool design in the course of electrochemical broaching. The objective is to enable the designer allocate the appropriate parameters related to a broaching tool design as well as machining conditions, for attaining a reguired component configuration. The scope comprises the study of the progressive processed shapes for a sguare or triangular shape broaching tools. Comparison between experimental and analytical results proved the validity of the use of the side gap equation for predicting the processed profiles and evaluating the power consumption. The results show that the rounding-off angle is governed mainly by the tool end geometry being insensitive to its overall geometry. Improved conformity was found to be a result of the increase in both tool feed rate and approach and pyramidical angles. The results also indicate that for triangular tools, both concavity and rounding-off characterize the workpiece profile.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    - H. TIPTON (1965) The Dynamics of Electrochemical Machining, Proc. 5th Int. MTDR Conference. PP. 509–522.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    - J.F. THORPE (1971). Ann., CIRP.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    - V.K. JAIN, and C.P. PANDEY (1981) Tooling Design for ECM- A Finite Element Approach, J. of Eng., for Industry, Vol. 103, PP. 183–191. Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    - S.R. Ghabrial and S.J. Ebeid, (1979) ECM Accuracy Assessed by Gap Inlet Parameters, 2nd Smp. on Manf. Eng., Lanch. Poly., Cov. England, PP. 174–178.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    - H. DIETZ, K.G. GÜNTHER, and K. OTTO (1973) Reproduction Accuracy with ECM, Determination of the Side Gap, Ann. of CIRP, Vol. 22/1. Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    - R. IPPOLITO and G. FASOLIO,(1976) The Workpiece Shape in the ECM of External Profiles Using Coated Electrodes, Int. J. MTDR, Vol. 16, No. 2, PP.129–136. Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    - S.J. EBEID (1979) Side Gap Estimation in Electrochemical Drilling, 1st. MDP Conf., Cairo Univ., Cairo, Egypt.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    - K.KAWAFUNT, T. MITKOSHIBA. and K. NOTO, (1968) Study on Shapes Processed by ECM, Ann. of CIRP, Vol. 16, PP.345–352.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    D. KREMER, A. MOISAN, S.J. EBEID and A.M. KOHAIL (1980) ‘Electrochemical Broaching’, ISEM6, Poland. Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    - G. GEWORKIAN, J. LANDAU, A. BAJRAMIAN, N. NADAJAN, and R. MNCAKANIAN (1980) Electrochemical Deburring and Hole Drilling, ISEM6, Poland. Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    - S.J. EBEID, E.M. BAXTER, and C.N. LARSSON (1978) Further Effects of Process Parameters on the Incidence of Sparking in ECM, 19th., MTDR Conf.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Limited 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. R. Ghabrial
    • 1
  • A. A. Nasser
    • 2
  • S. J. Ebeid
    • 1
  • A. A. Mahboud
    • 2
  1. 1.Design and Production Engineering Department, Faculty of EngineeringAin Shams UniversityEgypt
  2. 2.Design and Production Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering and TechnicalMenoufia UniversityEgypt

Personalised recommendations