Advertisement

Women and the Latin Rhetorical Tradition

  • Josephine Donovan

Abstract

In The Dialogic Imagination, Mikhail Bakhtin notes that through much of Western history there has been a kind of linguistic dialectic between centripetal and centrifugal forces: the former tending toward a unitary “Cartesian,” “official” language; the latter toward diffused regional dialects and vernaculars.1 Underlying this linguistic struggle were imperialistic political movements—beginning with the Romans and continuing with the establishment of the modern nation-states—and regional resistances to them.

Keywords

Early Modern Period Woman Writer Conversational Style Literary Style Nature Picture 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    M. M. Bakhtin, The Dialogic Imagination, ed. Michael Holquist (Austin: University of Texas Press, 1981), p. 271.VuiVui Further references follow in the text.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Walter J. Ong, The Presence of the Word (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1967), pp. 250–51. Further references follow in the text.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Walter J. Ong, Orality and Literacy (London: Routledge, 1988) p. 11. Further references follow in the text.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Peter Dronke, Women Writers of the Middle Ages (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984), p. viii. Further references follow in the text.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Erich Auerbach, Literary Language and Its Public in Late Latin Antiquity and in the Middle Ages (NewYork: Bollingen, 1965), p. 60.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    As cited in Barbara Newman, Sister of Wisdom (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1987), p. 7. Further references follow in the text.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jane Anger, “Her Protection for Women,” in by a woman writt, ed. Joan Goulianos (Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1973), p. 24.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Richard A. Carr, Introduction to Histoires tragiques by Pierre Boaistuau (Paris: Champion, 1977), p. xxxviii. My translation. Further references follow in the text.Google Scholar
  9. 10.
    Josephine Donovan, “Ecofeminist Literary Criticism: Reading the Orange,” Hypatia 11, no. 2 (1996): 161–84; also see discussion in chapters one and eleven.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 13.
    John J. Richetti, Popular Fiction before Richardson, rev. ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992), pp. 126–27, states that this largely feminine reading public “required the plain style ... because ornate style, intricate plot, and psychological complication were beyond its comprehension and appreciation.”CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 14.
    Percy G. Adams, Travel Literature and the Evolution of the Novel (Lexington: University Press of Kentucky, 1983), p. 247. Further references follow in the text.Google Scholar
  12. 15.
    Morris Croll, Style, Rhetoric, and Rhythm, ed. J. Max Patrick and Robert O. Evans (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1966), p. 224.VuiVuiGoogle Scholar
  13. 16.
    Ellen Moers, Literary Women (Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday, 1977), p. 97. Further references follow in the text.Google Scholar
  14. 17.
    Ian Watt, The Rise of the Novel (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1957), p. 194.Google Scholar
  15. 18.
    Erich Auerbach, Mimesis (Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday, 1953), pp. 95, 161, 189–92, 272, 274, 410–11. A further reference follows in the text.Google Scholar
  16. 19.
    Torquato Tasso, “Discourse on the Heroic Poem,” in Literary Criticism from Plato to Dryden, ed. Allan H. Gilbert (Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 1962), p. 465.Google Scholar
  17. 21.
    Virginia Woolf, Women & Fiction: The Manuscript Versions of “A Room of One’s Own,” ed. S. P. Rosenbaum (Oxford: Blackwell, 1992), p. 182VuiVui. Other than using an ampersand for “and,” Woolf transcribes the passage accurately. It is found in Pride and Prejudice, in The Novels of Jane Austen, ed. R. W. Chapman, 3d ed., 5 vols. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1923), 2:169.Google Scholar
  18. 22.
    Mary Field Belenky et al., Women’s Ways of Knowing (New York: Basic, 1986), pp. 24–28.Google Scholar
  19. 25.
    Earl Jeffrey Richards, Introduction to The Book of the City of Ladies by Christine de Pizan (New York: Persea, 1982), pp. xxi, xli.Google Scholar
  20. 26.
    Michel LeGuern, Preface to Contes amoureux par Madame Jeanne Flore, ed. Gabriel-A. Perouse et al. (Lyon: Presses Universitaires de Lyon, 1980), pp. 84–86.VuiVui Further references to this edition follow in the text. My translation.Google Scholar
  21. 27.
    Katherine S. Gittes, Framing the Canterbury Tales (Westport, Conn.: Greenwood, 1991), p. 29.Google Scholar
  22. 28.
    Mary Hyatt, The Way Women Write (New York: Teachers College Press, 1977), p. 67.Google Scholar
  23. 30.
    [Delarivier Manley], “To the Reader,” The Secret History of Queen Zarah, and the Zarazians, in The Novels of Mary Delariviere Manley, ed. Patricia Koster, 2 vols. (Gainesville, Fla.: Scholars’ Facsimiles & Reprints, 1971), l:A3r. Further references follow in the text.Google Scholar
  24. 32.
    Mary Davys, The Reform’d Coquet (1724; facsimile reprint, New York: Garland, 1973), p. 2.Google Scholar
  25. 33.
    Christine Mason Sutherland, “Mary Astell: Reclaimining Rhetorica in the Seventeenth Century,” in Reclaiming Rhetorica, ed. Andrea A. Lunsford (Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1995), p. 93.Google Scholar
  26. Further references follow in the text. Jacqueline Broad, Women Philosophers of the Seventeenth Century (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002), pp. 98–113, however, notes Astell’s critical attitude toward Cartesian dualism, paralleling the views of other women philosophers of the day (see chapter eleven below).Google Scholar
  27. 34.
    Rachel Blau DuPlessis, “For the Etruscans,” in The New Feminist Criticism, ed. Elaine Showalter (New York: Pantheon, 1981), p. 278.Google Scholar
  28. 35.
    Ann Banfield, Unspeakable Sentences (Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1982), pp. 228–29. Further references follow in the text.Google Scholar
  29. 36.
    Terry Eagleton, The Rape of Clarissa (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1982), p. 36.Google Scholar
  30. 37.
    Richard Ohmann, “Prolegomena to an Analysis of Prose Style,” in Style in Prose Fiction (New York: Columbia University Press, 1959), p. 14.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Josephine Donovan 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Josephine Donovan

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations