Skip to main content

The Nineties Generation: A Feminist Prosaics

  • Chapter
Women and the Rise of the Novel, 1405–1726
  • 34 Accesses

Abstract

While the realist tradition in english women’s prose fiction really began in the mid-seventeenth century with Margaret Cavendish, it was not until later in the century that a continuing tradition of realist prose fiction by women could be said to have developed. In the last two decades of the century and into the early eighteenth century such a tradition emerged. Pioneered by Delarivier Manley, Catherine Trotter, and to a lesser extent, Aphra Behn, it was most fully developed by the unfortunately neglected Irish woman, Mary Davys, and culminated in the works of lane Barker. These women invented women’s realism in English literature, a realism that did much to establish the character of the English novel. In their works the woman of sense (as opposed to sensibility) takes charge, and she expresses the viewpoint of feminist critical irony, by then firmly established by the women writers of the framed-novelle tradition. What these British writers add is a kind of commonsensical, comical perspective wherein the woman of sense serves as eiron to the alazon of romantic sensibility. More often than not her (and the author’s) critical perspective undermines generic stereotypes of women, offering instead a feminist prosaics wherein the specific realities of women’s lives are treated with serious attention.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. See Ruth Perry, The Celebrated Mary Astell, (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1986), pp. 14–15; also The Polemics and Poems of Rachel Speght, ed. Barbara Kiefer Lewalski (New York: Oxford University Press, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  2. See Ruth Perry, “Radical Doubt and the Liberation of Women,” Eighteenth-Century Studies 18, no. 4 (1985): 471–93;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Margaret Atherton, ed., Women Philosophers of the Early Modern Period (Indianapolis: Hackett, 1994);

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hilda Smith, Reason’s Disciples (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mary Astell, “A Serious Proposal to the Ladies” and “Some Reflections upon Marriage” (excerpts), in The Meridian Anthology of Early Women Writers, ed. Katherine M. Rogers and William McCarthy (New York: Penguin, 1987), p. 120. Further references follow in the text.

    Google Scholar 

  6. See Melissa A. Butler, “Early Liberal Roots of Feminism: John Locke and the Attack on Patriarchy,” in Feminist Interpretation and Political Theory, ed. Mary Lyndon Shanley and Carole Pateman (University Park: Penn State University Press, 1991), pp. 74–94.

    Google Scholar 

  7. B. G. MacCarthy, The Female Pen (1946–47; reprint, New York: New York University Press, 1994), p. 263.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Madame [Marie-Catherine le Jumel de Barneville, Baroness] d’Aulnoy, Travels into Spain, ed. R. Foulché-Delbosc (London: Routledge, 1930), p. 3; Madame d’Aulnoy, Relation du voyage d’Espagne, ed. R. Foulché-Delbosc (Paris: C. Klincksieck, 1926), p. 155VuiVui. Further references follow in the text.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Percy G. Adams, Travel Literature and the Evolution of the Novel (Lexington: University Press of Kentucky, 1983), pp. 74, 76. See his chapter, “Truth-Lie Dichotomy” for a further discussion of this issue. D’Aulnoy’s modern French editor, R. Foulché-Delbosc (see n. 7) holds a similar position.

    Google Scholar 

  10. [Delarivier Manley], Letters Writen [sic] by Mrs. Manley (London: R. B., 1696), p. 29. Further references follow in the text. Robert Adams Day, Told in Letters (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1966), p. 43, states that Manley “indubitably imitated” d’Aulnoy.

    Google Scholar 

  11. See Emma Donohue, Passions between Women (New York: Harper, 1993), pp. 131–32, 238.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fidelia Morgan, A Woman of No Character (London: Faber and Faber, 1986), p. 103.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Virginia Woolf, A Room of One’s Own (New York: Harcourt, 1957), p. 69.

    Google Scholar 

  14. See Naomi Jacobs, “The Seduction of Aphra Behn,” Women’s Studies 18 (1991): 395–03;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. also Judith Kegan Gardiner, “The First English Novel: Aphra Behn’s Love Letters, the Canon, and Women’s Tastes,” Tulsa Studies in Women’s Literature 8, no. 2 (Fall 1989): 201–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Aphra Behn, Oroonoko and Other Stories, ed. Maureen Duffy (London: Methuen, 1986), p. 125VuiVui.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lennard Davis, Factual Fictions (New York: Columbia University Press, 1983), p. 107.

    Google Scholar 

  18. William McBurney, “Mrs. Mary Davys: Forerunner of Fielding,” PMLA 74 (Sept. 1979): 354.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Jane Spencer, The Rise of the Woman Novelist (Oxford: Blackwell, 1986), p. 146.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Mary Davys, The Reform’d Coquet (1724; facsimile reprint, New York: Garland, 1973), pp. 80–81. Further references follow in the text.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1999 Josephine Donovan

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Donovan, J. (1999). The Nineties Generation: A Feminist Prosaics. In: Women and the Rise of the Novel, 1405–1726. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-67512-8_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics