Skip to main content

Design and Security

  • Chapter
The Handbook of Security

Abstract

Consider an elementary security problem: theft of customers’ bags in bars. Consider also an equally elementary practical solution: mounting clips beneath bar tables to secure bags by preventing thieves from moving them stealthily along the floor with their foot or lifting them off chairbacks while customers chat with their companions. Faced with high bag theft rates, in London, several years ago, the police developed the ‘Chelsea clip’,1 a plastic fixture screwed under bar tables for anchoring customers’ bags. The police enthusiastically promoted the clip and many were installed. However, an observational survey of a major shopping/entertainment locale in London (Upper Street, Islington) revealed that few were in use. A similar picture emerged more recently from research at a venue at London’s Victoria Station.2 Moreover, during the three-month period of observation by researchers from Central Saint Martins, just one Chelsea clip was found to be in use.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Armitage, R. (2012). Making a Brave Transition from Research to Reality, in Ekblom, P. (ed.). Design Against Crime: Crime Proofing Everyday Objects. Crime Prevention Studies. Volume 27, 65–86. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armitage, R. (2013). Crime Prevention Through Housing Design: Policy and Practice. Crime Prevention and Security Management. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Booch, G. (1993). Object-Oriented Analysis and Design with Applications. 2nd ed. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley Professional.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, R. (1999). Hot Products: Understanding, Anticipating and Reducing Demand for Stolen Goods. Police Research Series Paper 112. London: Home Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, R. (2008). Situational Crime Prevention, in Wortley, R. and Mazerolle, L. (eds.) Environmental Criminology and Crime Analysis, 178–194. Cullompton: Willan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, R. and Newman, G. (2005). Modifying Criminogenic Products — What Role for Government?, in Clarke, R. and Newman, G. (eds.). Designing out Crime from Products and Systems. Crime Prevention Studies. Volume 18, 7–84. Cullompton: Willan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, R. and Newman, G. (2006). Outsmarting the Terrorists. London: Praeger Security International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, L., Vila, B. and Machalek, R. (1995). Expropriative Crime and Crime Policy: An Evolutionary Ecological Analysis.. Studies on Crime and Crime Prevention, 4, 197–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, B. and Mansell, R. (2004). Synthesis of the Science Reviews. Accessed September 24, 2013, from www.bis.gov.uk/foresight/our-work/projects/published-projects/cyber-trust/reports.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornish, D. (1994). The Procedural Analysis of Offending and its Relevance for Situational Prevention, in Clarke, R. (ed.). Crime Prevention Studies. Volume 3, Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press. pp. 151–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cropley, D., Cropley, A., Kaufman, J. and Runco, M. (eds.) (2010). The Dark Side of Creativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowe, T. (2000). Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design. Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • DCLG (2004). Safer Places: The Planning System and Crime Prevention. London: Department for Communities and Local Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • Decker, S. (2005). Using Offender Interviews to Inform Police Problem Solving. Tool Guide 3. Washington, DC: Center for Problem-Oriented Policing. Accessed September 24, 2013, from www.popcenter.org/tools/offender_interviews.

    Google Scholar 

  • DTI (2000). Turning the Corner. Report of Foresight Programme’s Crime Prevention Panel. London: Department of Trade and Industry. Accessed September 24, 2013, from www.bis.gov.uk/assets/foresight/docs/crime-prevention/turning-the-corner-dec-2000.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durodié, B. (2002). Perception and Threat: Why Vulnerability-Led Responses Will Fail.. Homeland Security and Resilience Monitor, 1, 16–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eck, J. (2002). Learning from Experience in Problem-Oriented Policing and Situational Prevention: The Positive Functions of Weak Evaluations and the Negative Functions of Strong Ones. Crime Prevention Studies. Volume 14, 93–117. Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eck, J., Clarke, R. and Guerette, R. (2007). Risky Facilities: Crime Concentration in Homogeneous Sets of Establishments and Facilities, in Farrell, G., Bowers, K., Johnson, S. and Townsley, M. (eds.). Imagination for Crime Prevention: Essays in Honor of Ken Pease, Crime Prevention Studies. Volume 21, Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press. pp. 255–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekblom, P. (1995). Less Crime, by Design.. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 539, 114–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekblom, P. (1997). Gearing Up Against Crime: A Dynamic Framework to Help Designers Keep up with the Adaptive Criminal in a Changing World.. International Journal of Risk, Security and Crime Prevention, 2, 249–265. Accessed September 24, 2013, from www.veilig-ontwerp-beheer.nl/publicaties/gearing-up-against-crime/view.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekblom, P. (1999). Can We Make Crime Prevention Adaptive by Learning from Other Evolutionary Struggles?,. Studies on Crime and Crime Prevention, 8, 27–51. Accessed September 24, 2013, from www.veilig-ontwerp-beheer.nl/publicaties/can-we-make-crime-prevention-adaptive-by-learning-from-other-evolutionary-struggles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekblom, P. (2002). Future Imperfect: Preparing for the Crimes to Come.. Criminal Justice Matters, 46. Winter 2001/02, 38–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekblom, P. (2005a). Designing Products Against Crime, in Tilley, N. (ed.) Handbook f Crime Prevention and Community Safety. Cullompton: Willan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekblom, P. (2005b). How to Police the Future: Scanning for Scientific and Technological Innovations Which Generate Potential Threats and Opportunities in Crime, Policing and Crime Reduction, in Smith, M. and Tilley, N. (eds.) Crime Science: New Approaches to Preventing and Detecting Crime, 27–55. Cullompton: Willan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekblom, P. (2008). Designing Products Against Crime, in Wortley, R. and Mazerolle, L. (eds.) Environmental Criminology and Crime Analysis. Cullompton: Willan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekblom. P. (2010). The Conjunction of Criminal Opportunity Theory. Sage Encyclopedia of Victimology and Crime Prevention. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. See also http://5isframework.wordpress.com/conjunction-of-criminal-opportunity/. Accessed May 24, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekblom, P. (2011). Crime Prevention, Security and Community Safety Using the 5Is Framework. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekblom, P. (ed.) (2012a). Design Against Crime: Crime Proofing Everyday Objects. Crime Prevention Studies. Volume 27. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekblom, P. (2012b). Happy Returns: Ideas Brought Back from Situational Crime Prevention’s Exploration of Design Against Crime, in Farrell, G. and Tilley, N. (eds.) The Reasoning Criminologist: Essays in Honour of Ronald V. Clarke, 52–64. Crime Science Series. Cullompton: Willan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekblom, P. (2012c). The Security Function Framework: Towards a Systematic Language and Approach for Designing Against Crime, in Ekblom, P. (ed.). Design Against Crime: Crime Proofing Everyday Objects. Crime Prevention Studies. Volume 27, 9–36. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekblom, P., Bowers, K., Gamman, L., Sidebottom, A., Thomas, C., Thorpe, A. and Willcocks, M. (2012). Reducing Handbag Theft in Bars, in Ekblom, P. (ed.) Design Against Crime: Crime Proofing Everyday Objects. Crime Prevention Studies. Volume 27, Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekblom, P. and Sidebottom, A. (2008). What do you Mean, ‘Is it secure?’ Redesigning Language to be fit for the Task of Assessing the Security of Domestic and Personal Electronic Goods.. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 14, 61–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekblom, P. and Tilley, N. (2000). Going Equipped: Criminology, Situational Crime Prevention and the Resourceful Offender.. British Journal of Criminology, 40, 376–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, G. and Roman, J. (2006). Crime as Pollution: Proposal for Market-Based Incentives to Reduce Crime Externalities, in Stephens, M. and Moss, K. (eds.) Crime Reduction and the Law, 135–155. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felson, M. (2006). Crime and Nature. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamman, L. and Pascoe, T. (eds.) (2004). Seeing is Believing. Special Issue of Crime Prevention and Community Safety Journal, 6(4).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamman, L. and Thorpe, A. (2007). Profit From Paranoia — Design Against ‘paranoid’ products. European Academy of Design Conference 07: Dancing with Disorder: Design, Discourse, Disaster, Izmir, Turkey. Accessed September 24, 2013, from www.bikeoff.org/2007/04/30/profit-from-paranoia-design-against-paranoid-products/.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, M. (2005). Reducing the Capacity to Offend: Restricting Resources for Offending, in Tilley, N. (ed.) The Handbook of Crime Prevention and Community Safety, 306–328. Cullompton: Willan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, M. and Clarke, R. (2012). Slowing Thefts of Fast-Moving Goods, in Ekblom, P. (ed.). Design Against Crime: Crime Proofing Everyday Products. Crime Prevention Studies. Volume 27, 229–238. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardie, J. and Hobbs, B. (2005). Partners Against Crime — The Role of the Corporate Sector in Tackling Crime, in Clarke, R. and Newman, G. (eds.). Designing Out Crime from Products and Systems. Crime Prevention Studies. Volume 18, 85–140. Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press and Cullompton: Willan Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilton, K. and Irons, A. (2006). A ‘Criminal Personas’ Approach to Countering Criminal Creativity.. Crime Prevention and Community Safety, 8, 248–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HM Treasury (2005). The Cox Review of Creativity in Business. London: HM Treasury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Home Office (2006). Changing Behaviour to Prevent Crime: An Incentives-Based Approach. Online report 05/06. London: Home Office. Accessed September 24, 2013, from http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20110218135832/http://www.rds.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/pdfs06/rdsolr0506.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Home Office (2012). Crowded Places: The Planning System and Counter-Terrorism. Accessed September 24, 2013, from www.gov.uk/government/publications/protecting-crowded-places.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houghton, G. (1992). Car Theft in England & Wales: The Home Office Car Theft Index. CPU Paper 33. London: Home Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs, B. (2011). Gang Used 3D Printers for ATM Skimmers. http://krebsonsecurity.com/2011/09/gang-used-3d-printers-for-atm-skimmers/. Accessed September 24, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laycock, G. (2004). The UK Car Theft Index: An Example of Government Leverage, in Maxfield, M. and Clarke, R. (eds.). Understanding and Preventing Car Theft. Crime Prevention Studies 17, 25–44. Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lockton, D., Harrison, D. and Stanton, N. (2008). Design with Intent: Persuasive Technology in a Wider Context, in Oinas-Kukkonen, H., Hasle, P., Harjumaa, M., Segerståhl, K. and Øhrstrøm, P. (eds.). Persuasive Technology: Third International Conference, PERSUASIVE 2008, Oulu, Finland, June 4–6, 2008, Proceedings, 274–278. Series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 5033. Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lulham, R., Camacho Duarte, O., Dorst, K. and Kaldor, L. (2012). Designing a Counterterrorism Trash Bin, in Ekblom, P. (ed.) Design Against Crime: Crime Proofing Everyday Objects, 131–146. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mailley, J., Garcia, R., Whitehead, S. and Farrell, G. (2008). Phone Theft Index.. Security Journal, 21, 212–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, S. and Ekblom, P. (2011). Specifying the Explosion-Resistant Railway Carriage — a Desktop Test of the Security Function Framework.. Journal of Transportation Security, 5, 69–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monchuk, L. and Clancey, G. (2013). A Comparative Analysis of Crime Risk Assessments and Their Application in Greater Manchester and New South Wales.. Built Environment, 39, 74–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, R., Caulier-Grice, J. and Mulgan, G. (2010). The Open Book of Social Innovation. London: Nesta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papanek, V. (1971). Design for the Real World. London: Thames and Hudson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pawson, R. and Tilley, N. (1997). Realistic Evaluation. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pease, K. (2001). Cracking Crime through Design. London: Design Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pease, K. (2009). The Carbon Cost of Crime and Its Implications. Report Prepared for ACPO CPI. Available at: www.securedbydesign.com/professionals/publications.aspx.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sagarin, R. (2008). A Holistic View of Natural Security, in Sagarin, R. and Taylor, T. (eds.) Natural Security. A Darwinian Approach to a Dangerous World, Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sagarin, R. and Taylor, T. (eds.) (2008). Natural Security. A Darwinian Approach to a Dangerous World. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, E. and Stappers, P. (2008). Co-Creation and the New Landscapes of Design. CoDesign, 4, 5–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sasse, M.A., Ashenden, D., Lawrence, D., Coles-Kemp, L., Fléchais, I. and Kearney, P. (2007). Human Vulnerabilities in Security Systems. Human Factors Working Group White Paper. London: UCL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneier, B. (1999). Attack Trees. Dr. Dobb’s Journal, December. Accessed September 24, 2013, from www.schneier.com/paper-attacktrees-ddj-ft.html.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shover, N. (1996). Great Pretenders: Pursuits and Careers of Persistent Thieves. London: Westview Press/Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, M. and Currie, P. (eds.) (2012). Terrorism and Affordance. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilley, N. (1993). After Kirkholt: Theory, Methods and Results of Replication Evaluations. Crime Prevention Unit Paper 47. London: Home Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watt, J. and Brown, T. (2010). Design Thinking for Social Innovation. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 28. Accessed September 24, 2013, from www.ssireview.org/articles/entry/design_thinking_for_social_innovation/.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, S., Mailley, J., Storer, I., McCardle, J., Torrens, G. and Farrell, G. (2008). In Safe Hands: A Review of Mobile Phone Anti-theft Designs.. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 14, 39–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2014 Paul Ekblom

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ekblom, P. (2014). Design and Security. In: Gill, M. (eds) The Handbook of Security. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-67284-4_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics