Changing Attitudes to the ‘European-ness’ of the Holocaust and of its Victims

  • George Wilkes
Chapter

Abstract

The statement that the Holocaust was a ‘European’ event is so common that it seems self-evident. It seemed an obvious point of reference to the perpetrators of ‘the Final Solution of the European Jewish question’ and it has subsequently been taken for granted in most academic works which attempt to tell the story of ‘the destruction of European Jewry’. The adoption of these terms has come with a distinct price, leaving open a number of questions about the intention of the perpetrators of the Holocaust and the suffering of their victims. The use of the term by the architects of the Final Solution belies the evidence that they did not confine their vision to a Judenrein Europe, and organizations dedicated to saving Jewish lives began to use the term ‘European Jewry’ despite the fact that the vast majority of the victims of the Holocaust did not see themselves as ‘European’. Before the Holocaust the Jews of Europe were hardly ever described as European: the Holocaust marked the birth of the concept of ‘European Jewry’, both in the lexicon of Europe’s antisemites and also in the annals of Jewish history as Jews have conceived it.

Keywords

Europe Ghost Decon Romania Mete 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 2.
    For the period when the term ‘European Jewry’ was still evoked only rarely, see Mark Levene, War, Jews, and the New Europe: the diplomacy of Lucien Wolf 1914–1919 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992), passim. The term ‘European Jewry’ began to be used with more frequency in the 1920s among the leadership of the American Jewish Congress, a by-product of their activist approach to involvement on behalf of Jewish communities across Europe.Google Scholar
  2. 3.
    See Solomon Grayzel, A History of the Jews (Philadelphia: Jewish Publication Society of America, 1947), e.g. pp.657, 680, 724–25, and comparable references in Simon Dubnov, History of the Jews, written in the 1920s (English translation of the 4th Russian edition of 1936–39 published by T. Yoseloff, New Jersey, 1973), Vol. V, pp.888, 893.Google Scholar
  3. 10.
    See, e.g., Max Nordau, Die Conventionellen Lügen der Kulturmenschheit (1883) andGoogle Scholar
  4. Uri Zvi Greenberg, In the Kingdom of the Cross (1923) and Oracle to Europe (1924), cited inGoogle Scholar
  5. David G. Roskies, Against the Apocalypse: Responses to Catastrophe in Modern Jewish Culture (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1984), pp.269–73.Google Scholar
  6. 14.
    Elke Fröhlich, ed., Die Tagebücher von Josef Goebbels: Sämtliche Fragmente, (Munich: Saur, 1987), Pt. I, Vol. 3, p.628, diary entry for 2 November 1939.Google Scholar
  7. 15.
    Stig Hornshoj-Moeller, Foerermyten. Adolf Hitler, Joseph Goebbels og historien bag et Folkemord (Copenhagen, 1996); abridged English version in ‘The Role of “Produced Reality” in the Decision-Making Process which led to the Holocaust’, paper presented to conference of the Association of Genocide Scholars, Montreal, 1997, available on the website of The Holocaust History Project, <www.holocaust-history.org>.Google Scholar
  8. 16.
    Thus, many of the early treatments of the plan already dismissed it as a cover for mass murder: Artur Eisenbach, Hitlerowska Polityka Zaglady Zydów, Warsaw, 1961, p.669;Google Scholar
  9. L. Poliakov, La bréviaire de la haine (Paris: Calmann-Lévy, 1951; citations from 1979 edition), pp.36, 51;Google Scholar
  10. H. Arendt, Eichmann in Jerusalem (New York: Viking, 1963), pp.76–77;Google Scholar
  11. Salo Baron, ‘European Jewry before and after Hitler’, in M.R. Marrus (ed.), The Nazi Holocaust: Historical Articles on the Destruction of European Jews (Westport CT: Meckler, 1989), Vol. I, p.50.Google Scholar
  12. 18.
    Louis P. Lochner (ed.), Goebbels Diaries (London, 1948), 7 March 1942, pp.115–116. Though with respect to the ‘Final Solution’ Goebbels was in some respects outside the key policy-making circle by this time, it was not unheard of for other policy-makers to speculate on similar lines well after the Wannsee Conference.Google Scholar
  13. 20.
    E.g. Martin Broszat, ‘Hitler und die Genesis der Endlösung’, Vierteljahrshefie fir Zeitgeschichte, 25 (1977), pp.739–775, andGoogle Scholar
  14. Eberhard Jäckel, Hitler in History (Hanover NH: University Press of New England, 1984), p.53.Google Scholar
  15. 22.
    Raul Hilberg, The Politics of Memory: The Journey of a Holocaust Historian (Chicago: Ivan R. Dee, 1996), p.79.Google Scholar
  16. 28.
    Yitzhak Arad, Shmuel Krakowski and Shmuel Spector (eds.), The Einsatzgruppen Reports (New York: Holocaust Library, 1989), pp.xii–xiii.Google Scholar
  17. 29.
    See, e.g., Michel Abitbol, The Jems of North Africa during the Second World War, Engl, trans. (Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 1989).Google Scholar
  18. 35.
    See, e.g., H. Stuart Hughes, Consciousness and Society: The reorientation of European social thought, 1890–1930 (New York: Knopf, 1958);Google Scholar
  19. Ernst Nolle, Three Faces of Fascism (Der Faschismus in seiner Epoche, 1963), (London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1965);Google Scholar
  20. Renzo de Felice, Interpretations of Fascism, 1972 (English trans., Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press, 1977);Google Scholar
  21. Ernst Nolle, Der europäische Bürgerkrieg 1917–1945 (Berlin: Propyläen, 1986).Google Scholar
  22. 36.
    See, e.g., Norman G. Finkelstein and Ruth Bettina Birn, eds, A Nation on Trial: the Goldhagen Thesis and Historical Truth (New York: Metropolitan Books, 1998), p. 133.Google Scholar
  23. 39.
    This has been the orthodoxy in the historiography of European integration. See in particular Walter Lipgens, Documents on the History of European Integration. Vol. 1: Continental Plans for European Union 1939–1945 (Berlin/New York: Nomos, 1985).Google Scholar
  24. M.L. Smith and P.M. Stirk, Making the New Europe: European unity and the Second World War (London: Pinter, 1990).Google Scholar
  25. and Michel Dumoulin, ed., Wartime Plans for Postwar Europe (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 1995), which has just one short chapter by Yves Durand on ‘L’Europe des Collaborateurs et Collaborationnistes’, pp.25–43. Durand does not mention antisemitism.Google Scholar
  26. 40.
    For a rare critique of this historical assessment, see Max Beloff, Europe and the Europeans (London, 1957).Google Scholar
  27. 41.
    See, esp., Eberhard Jäckel and Lea Rosh, eds, ‘Der Tod ist ein Meister aus Deutschland’: Deportation und Ermordung der Juden: Kollaboration und Verweigerung in Europa, 2nd edn. (Hamburg: Hoffmann & Campe, 1990).Google Scholar
  28. 42.
    Götz Aly and Susanne Heim, Vordenker der Vernichtung: Auschwitz und die deutschen Pläne für eine neue europäische Ordnung (Frankfurt: Fischer, 1993), passim.Google Scholar
  29. 43.
    See, e.g., the contributions of Christian Gerlach and Christoph Dieckmann to Ulrich Herbert (ed.), National Socialist Extermination Policies: Contemporary German Perspectives and Controversies (New York/London: Berghahn, 2000).Google Scholar
  30. 45.
    To give one example, Paul de Man wrote in Le Soir (4 March 1941) of the Jewish contamination of European life, advocating the ‘isolation’ of the Jews from European life, along comparable lines to the comments about Jews introducing disarray into Europe made in some of Heidegger’s work (see discussion by Derrida, cited in Dominick LaCapra, History, Theory, Trauma: Representing the Holocaust (Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press, 1994), p.l27ff)Google Scholar
  31. 46.
    Volhyn, editorial, 1 September 1941, cited in Shmuel Spector, The Holocaust of Volhynian Jewry, 1941–1944 (Jerusalem: Yad Vashem, 1990), p.239.Google Scholar
  32. 47.
    See S. Neshamit, ‘Jewish-Lithuanian Relations’, in Yad Vashem, The Historiography of the Holocaust Period (Jerusalem: Yad Vashem, 1988), p.297.Google Scholar
  33. 48.
    Z. Bauman, Modernity and the Holocaust (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1989), p.27.Google Scholar
  34. 49.
    H. Arendt, Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil (London/NY: Faber & Faber, 1963 edition), p.154.Google Scholar
  35. 50.
    As early as 1938 German Jews who fled to Palestine were talking of their experiences in the Reich as the events happening in ‘Europe’. See, e.g., Tom Segev, The Seventh Million: The Israelis and the Holocaust (Engl, trans., New York: Hill & Wang, 1993).Google Scholar
  36. 53.
    Poliakov, La bréviaire de la haine, p.293, suggested both sides called it the Europa-Plan. See also the articles by L. Rothkirchen and S. Merlin in S.M. Finger, Their Brothers’ Keepers: American Jewry and the Holocaust (New York: American Jewish Commission on the Holocaust, 1984).Google Scholar
  37. 55.
    Dina Porat, The Blue and the Yellow Star of David: The Zionist leadership in Palestine and the Holocaust, 1939–1945 (Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press, 1990), partie, p.245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 56.
    E.g. Weizmann to the British War Office, March 1944, quoted in B. Wasserstein, Britain and the Jews of Europe, 1939–1945 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1979), p.285.Google Scholar
  39. 57.
    Uri Zvi Greenberg, 1945, To God in Europe, I, II and III; see David G. Roskies, Against the Apocalypse: Responses to Catastrophe in Modern Jewish Culture (Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press, 1984), pp.269–73.Google Scholar
  40. 58.
    Leni Yahil, The Holocaust: The Fate of European Jewry, 1932–1945 (New York: Oxford University Press, 1990 [1987]), p.660;Google Scholar
  41. Ze’ev Mankowitz, ‘She’erith Ha Pletah and Jewish historiography’, The Historiography of the Holocaust Period (Jerusalem: Yad Vashem, 1998), pp.755–56;Google Scholar
  42. Ze’ev Mankowitz, ‘The formation of She’erit Hapleitah: November 1944-July 1945’, Yad Vashem Studies 20 (1990): 337–370.Google Scholar
  43. 59.
    Introduction to Tadeusz Borowski, This Way for the Gas, Ladies and Gentlemen (original 1959, translation 1967, quotations from Penguin edition of 1976), pp.16, 20.Google Scholar
  44. 61.
    E. Canetti, The Tongue Set Free: Remembrance of a European Childhood (London: Deutsch, 1979). The title of the German original did not refer to Europe at all: Die gerettete Zunge: Geschichte einer Jugend (Munich: Hanser, 1978).Google Scholar
  45. 64.
    See, e.g., T.W. Adorno, Dialektik der Außlärung (Amsterdam: Querido, 1947; Engl, trans., New York: Herder & Herder, 1972);Google Scholar
  46. T.W. Adorno et al., The Authoritarian Personality (New York: Harper, 1950); T.W. Adorno, ‘Erziehung nach Auschwitz’, Gesammelte Schriften (Frankfurt: Suhr-kamp), Vol.11, pp.674–690.Google Scholar
  47. 66.
    See, e.g., A. Neher, L’existence juive: solitude et affrontements (Paris: Seuil, 1962), esp. pp.184–208.Google Scholar
  48. 67.
    E.g. R. Rubenstein, After Auschwitz (Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1966), pp.x, 128, 223–25.Google Scholar
  49. 73.
    S. Perel, Europa, Europa (New York: Wiley, 1997), p.xii.Google Scholar
  50. 74.
    Eva G. Reichmann, Hostages of Civilisation: The Social Sources of National Socialist Anti-Semitism (London, 1950), pp.20, 121.Google Scholar
  51. 75.
    G. Reitlinger, The Final Solution: The Attempt to Exterminate the Jems of Europe, 1939–45 (London: Vallentine Mitchell, 1953), p.4.Google Scholar
  52. 76.
    J. Fest, The Face of the Third Reich, 1963 (Engl, trans., Harmondworth: Penguin, 1979), p. 101;Google Scholar
  53. Leni Yahil, The Holocaust: the Fate of European Jewry, 1932–1945 (New York: Oxford University Press, 1990), p.653.Google Scholar
  54. 77.
    See, e.g., Artur Eisenbach, Hitlerowska Polityka Zaglady Zydów (Warsaw, 1961), p.48ff.Google Scholar
  55. 78.
    E.g. Arendt, Origins of Totalitarianism, passim; Fest, The Face of the Third Reich, p.110; George Mosse, Towards the Final Solution: A History of European Racism (London: Dent, 1978);Google Scholar
  56. Poliakov, The History of Anti-Semitism (London: Routledge, 1974), Vol. IV, ‘Suicidal Europe, 1870–1933’, see particularly p.viii.Google Scholar
  57. 79.
    See Hilberg, The Destruction of European Jewry, 1985 edn. (New York: Holmes & Meier), pp.5, 19–20.Google Scholar
  58. 80.
    Nora Levin, The Holocaust: the destruction of European Jewry 1933–1945 (New York: Schocken, 1968), pp.xi–xiii, 5–11. See also Tom Segev, The Seventh Million, p 434, for an account of the introduction of Holocaust and Ghetto Memorial Day in 1951 as a day which recalled ‘European Jewry’ being massacred in the crusades.Google Scholar
  59. 84.
    Bernard Wasserstein, Britain and the Jews of Europe, 1939–1945 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1979), p.357; see also pp.47–8, 221, 343–4.Google Scholar
  60. 89.
    e.g. Mark Kurlansky, A Chosen Few: the Resurrection of European Jewry (Reading MA: Addison-Wesley, 1995).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • George Wilkes

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations