Advertisement

The Shift Towards Death

A Comparison of the Nazi Euthanasia Programme and Contemporary Debates on Euthanasia and Physician-Assisted Suicide
  • Amy C. Zaro
Chapter

Abstract

Euthanasia, the notion of having a good death, is an idea that originated in ancient Greece. Greek discussions about euthanasia illustrate that the human fear of a slow death and the subsequent loss of quality of life are not new issues and have in fact been a major aspect of moral debates throughout the history of Western civilization. Under the Nazi regime, however, euthanasia became a biological solution to a political problem rather than simply a moral debate about ‘a good death’. It grew into a legalized method for mass murder that introduced a certain rhetoric and instituted a tragic softening of conscience that culminated in the Final Solution. Perhaps the most startling aspect of the euthanasia policies of the Third Reich is that some of the rhetoric and reasoning used then are still present in contemporary physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia debates. These contemporary debates tackle the problematic issue of when it is medically, socially, and legally permissible to terminate life. While there are many crucial differences between the euthanasia programme in Nazi Germany and current debates, there are certain continuities which should be explored. These continuities include the pressures of social responsibility, of maintaining of quality of life, and of limits on personal autonomy. This paper will seek to offer background on both the euthanasia programme under the Nazis and the contemporary debates on legalizing physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia. This background will be followed by a discussion of how the past horrors of the Nazi regime should be integrated into our current collective conscience in determining the norms of life and death.

Keywords

Personal Autonomy Contemporary Debate Ethical Choice Mass Murder Nazi Regime 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    For additional information on the German scientific and medical communities during the Nazi seizure of power, see: Christian Pross, ‘Nazi Doctors, German Medicine, and Historical Truth’, The Nazi Doctors and the Nuremberg Code, eds. George J. Annas and Michael A. Grodin (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992);Google Scholar
  2. Robert Proctor ‘Nazi Doctors, Racial Medicine, and Human Experimentation’, The Nazi Doctors and the Nuremberg Code, eds. George J. Annas and Michael A. Grodin (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992);Google Scholar
  3. Paul Weindling, Health, Race, and German Politics Between National Unification and Nazism, 1870–1945 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989), chapter 8;Google Scholar
  4. Henry Friedlander, The Origins of Nazi Genocide (Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press, 1995).Google Scholar
  5. 2.
    Qtd. in Benno Muller Hill, Murderous Science: Elimination by Scientific Selection of Jews, Gypsies, and Others in Germany, 1933–1945 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1988): 25.Google Scholar
  6. 3.
    Sheila Faith Weiss, ‘The Racial Hygiene Movement in Germany, 1904–1945’, The Wellborn Science: Eugenics in Germany, France, Brazil, and Russia, ed. Mark B. Adams (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990): 36.Google Scholar
  7. 6.
    For additional background on the Sterilization Law, see: Robert Jay Lifton, The Nazi Doctors: Medical Killing and the Psychology of Genocide (New York: Basic Books, Inc., 1986), chapter 1;Google Scholar
  8. Daniel Nadav, ‘Sterilization, Euthanasia, and the Holocaust — the Brutal Chain’, Medicine, Ethics and the Third Reich: Historical and Contemporary Issues, ed. John Michalczyk (Kansas City, MO: Sheed and Ward, 1994);Google Scholar
  9. 10.
    Michael Burleigh, ‘Racism as Social Policy: The Nazi “Euthanasia” Program, 1939–1945’, Ethnic and Racial Studies 14 (1991): 455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 20.
    Michael Burleigh and Wolfgang Wipperman, The Racial State: Germany, 1933–1945 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991): 159.Google Scholar
  11. 21.
    Hugh Gallagher, By Trust Betrayed: Patients, Physicians, and the License to Kill in the Third Reich (Arlington, VA: Vandamere Press, 1995): 8.Google Scholar
  12. 28.
    John H. Robinson, ‘Physician-Assisted Suicide: Its Challenge to the Prevailing Constitutional Paradigm’, Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics and Public Policy 9 (1995): 3477.Google Scholar
  13. 29.
    David Schanker, ‘Of Suicide Machines, Euthanasia Legislation, and the Health Care Crisis’, Indiana Law Journal 68 (1993): 980.Google Scholar
  14. 31.
    For background information on the American movement for legalized euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide, see: Lisa Sowie Cahill, ‘Bioethical Decisions to End Life’, Theological Studies 52 (1991): 107–121;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. E. J. Emmanuel, ‘The History of the Euthanasia Debates in the United States and Britain’, Annals of Internal Medicine 121 (1994): 793–802; ‘It’s Over, Debbie’, JAMA 2759 (1988): 272;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. George Lundberg, ‘It’s Over, Debbie’ and the Euthanasia Debate’, JAMA 259 (1988): 2142;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Willard Gayland, Leon Kass, Edmund Pellegrino and Mark Siegler, ‘Doctors Must Not Kill’, JAMA 259 (1988): 24–45.Google Scholar
  18. Timothy Quill, ‘Death and Dignity: A Case of Individualized Decision Making’, New England Journal of Medicine 324 (1991): 691–94; Quill v. Vacco, 80F.3d 716 (Second Circuit, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 32.
    M. Cathleen Kaveny, ‘Assisted Suicide, Euthanasia, and the Law’, Theological Studies 58 (1997): 125.Google Scholar
  20. 33.
    Qtd. in John Paris, ‘Active Euthanasia’, Theological Studies, 53 (1992): 121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 34.
    Qtd. in Franklin G. Miller and John C. Fletcher, ‘Physician-Assisted Suicide and Active Euthanasia’, Physician-Assisted Death, eds. James M. Humber, Robert F. Almeder, and Gregg A. Kasting (Totowa, New Jersey: Humana Press, 1994), 80.Google Scholar
  22. 35.
    Edmund Pellegrino, ‘Doctors Must Not Kill’, Euthanasia: The Good of Patient, the Good of Society, ed. Robert Misbin (Frederick Maryland: University Publishing Group, 1992), 30.Google Scholar
  23. 36.
    Daniel Callahan, ‘When Self-Determination Runs Amok’, Hastings Center Report (March–April 1992): 52Google Scholar
  24. 39.
    Diane E. Meier, ‘Doctors’ Attitudes and Experiences with Physician-Assisted Death:: A Review of the Literature’, Physician Assisted Death, eds. James M. Humber, Robert F. Almeder, and Gregg A. Kasting (Totowa, New Jersey: Human Press, 1993): 8.Google Scholar
  25. 40.
    Luke Gormally, ed. Euthanasia, Clinical Practice, and the Law (London: Linacre Centre for Health Care Ethics, 1994): 30.Google Scholar
  26. 41.
    Franklin G. Miller and John C. Fletcher, ‘Physician Assisted Suicide and Active Euthanasia’, Physician-Assisted Death, eds. James M. Humber, Robert F. Almeder, and Gregg A. Kasting (Totowa, New Jersey: Human Press, 1993): 90.Google Scholar
  27. 44.
    Richard Fenigsen, ‘Physician-Assisted Death in the Netherlands: Impact on Long Term Care’, Issues in Law and Medicine 3 (1995): 283.Google Scholar
  28. 45.
    John Keown, ‘Euthanasia in the Netherlands: Sliding down the Slippery Slope?’ Euthanasia Examines: Ethical, Clinical and Legal Perspective, ed. John Keown (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995): 263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 46.
    Pieter Admiraal, ‘Voluntary Euthanasia: The Dutch Way’, Death, Dying, and the Law, ed. Sheila A.M. McLean (Aldershot: Dartmouth, 1996): 114.Google Scholar
  30. 48.
    Alison Hall, ‘To Die with Dignity: Comparing Physician-Assisted Suicide in the United State, Japan and the Netherlands’, Washington University Law Quarterly 74 (1996): 827.Google Scholar
  31. 49.
    Herbert Hendin, Seduced by Death: Doctors, Patients, and the Dutch Cure (New York: W.W. Norton and Company, 1997, 141.Google Scholar
  32. 57.
    Loes Pinjenborg, Paul van der Maas, Johannes J.M. van Delden, Casper W.N. Looman, ‘Life-Terminating Acts Without Explicit Request of Patient.’ The Lancet 341 (May 8, 1993): 1197.Google Scholar
  33. 63.
    D.J. Bakker, ‘Active Euthanasia: Is Mercy Killing the Killing of Mercy?’ Euthanasia: The Good of the Patients, the Good of Societyj, ed. Robert I. Misbin (Frederick, MD: University publishing Group, 1992): 88.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Amy C. Zaro

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations