Post-Holocaust Ethics

The Morality of the Use of Power
  • Leonard Grob


If, as has often been argued, the Holocaust constitutes a ‘watershed’ event in human history, then it follows that our Western tradition of ethics must come under severe scrutiny. How can it be, we must ask, that at the heart of modern Western civilization, our ethico-religious legacies failed to provide a safeguard against unprecedented genocidal behaviour? Is it possible, we might ask, that these traditions not only proved incapable of averting the catastrophe that was the Holocaust, but were also, in some measure, implicated in its very coming-to-be? Did these traditions not merely fail to successfully address the ‘problem’, but were themselves, in some respect, part of it?


Moral Agent Western Thought Hegemonic Power Ethical Vision Moral Directive 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Richard L. Rubenstein, The Cunning of History: The Holocaust and the American Future (New York: Harper Torchbooks, 1987), p.90.Google Scholar
  2. 3.
    Emmanuel Levinas, Totality and Infinity: An Essay on Exteriority, tr. Alphonso Lingis (Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press, 1969), p.37.Google Scholar
  3. 5.
    Emmanuel Levinas, ‘Ethics as First Philosophy’, in The Levinas Reader, ed. Sean Hand (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1989), pp.76–77.Google Scholar
  4. 6.
    Here I am indebted to the work of Jean-Paul Sartre. For Sartre, the struggle between me and the other is a matter of my attempting to free myself from the hold that the other wishe to place on me at the same time as he or she tries to free her/himself from the hold with which I wish to enslave him or her. See Being and Nothingness, tr. Hazel Barnes (New York: Pocket Books, 1956), especially pp.474–475.Google Scholar
  5. 8.
    Emmanuel Levinas, Ethics and Infinity: Conversations with Philippe Nemo, tr. Richard A. Cohen (Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press, 1965), p.96.Google Scholar
  6. 18.
    Nancy Hartsock, ‘Political change: Two Perspectives on Power’, in Charlotte Bunch and others, ed. Building Feminist Theory (New York: Longman, 1981), pp.3–4.Google Scholar
  7. 19.
    Martin Buber, I and Thou, tr. Ronald G. Smith (New York: Collier Books, 1987), p. 18.Google Scholar
  8. 20.
    Martin Buber, ‘What is Man’, in Between Man and Man, tr. Ronald Gregor Smith (New York: Macmillian, 1965), p.184.Google Scholar
  9. 21.
    Buber, ‘Two Letters to Gandhi from Martin Buber and J.L. Magnes, Pamphlets on the ‘Bond’ (Jerusalem: Ruben Mass, April 1939), p. 19.Google Scholar
  10. 23.
    Buber, ‘Warum muss der aufbau Palastinas ein Sozialistischer sein’, in Der Jude und sein Judentum, 338. Cited and translated in Bernard Susser, Existence and Utopia: The Social and Political Thought of Martin Buber (Rutherford, NJ: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, 1981), p.114.Google Scholar
  11. 28.
    Buber, ‘The Validity and Limitation of the Political Principle’, in Pointing the Way, tr. Maurice S. Friedman (New York: Harper & Row, 1963), p.217.Google Scholar
  12. 34.
    Buber, ‘And If Not Now, When?’ in Israel and the World: Essays in a Time of Crisis (New York: Schocken Books, 1948), p.239.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Leonard Grob

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations