Remembering for the Present

Using the Holocaust to Misunderstand Genocide and to Segregate the ‘Final Solution of the Jewish Question’
  • Helen Fein


Genocide, said my caller from Zagreb in 1994 (Dr. Slobodan Lang of the Helsinki Watch Committee), has become the most successful crime of this century. Unlike an occupation or colonial enterprise, its results cannot be undone. Since 1992, the practice of genocide has reoccurred in Europe, where it was stopped, we had wishfully believed since 1945, forever.


Geneva Convention International Criminal Tribunal Jewish Question Armenian Genocide Memorial Museum 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Frank Chalk and Kurt Jonassohn, The History and Sociology of Genocide (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1990), pp.230–248.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Indictments by Rwanda, International Criminal Tribunal on Rwanda, and documentation by Human Rights Watch [HRW] and International Federation of Human Rights [IFHR]; for estimate, see Alison Des Forges, ‘LeaveNoneto Tell the Story’: Genocide in Rwanda (New York/HRW & IFHR: 1999), pp.15—16.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Viscount James Bryce, The Treatment of Armenians in the Ottoman Empire 1915—1916, ed. Arnold Toynbee (London: HSMO, 1916).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    International Criminal Tribunal at Nuremburg, 1946; for estimates, see Helen Fein, ‘Reviewing the Toll: Jewish Dead, Losses and Victims of the Holocaust’, Shoah (Spring 1981): 20—26.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jürgen Foster, ‘The German Army and the Ideological War Against the Soviet Union’, in The Policies of Genocide: Jews and Soviet Prisoners of War in Nazi Germany, ed. Gerhard Hirschfeld (London: Allen & Unwin, 1986), pp.15–29.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    International League for Human Rights; see Richard Arens, Genocide in Paraguay (Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1976).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    The Guatemalan Commission for Historical Clarification (CEH) determined genocide had occurred in Guatemala (for report, see I am grateful to Prof. Herbert F. Spirer (Columbia University Center for the Study of Human Rights), statistical analyst for CEH, for the estimate of victims and population. Also see State Violence in Guatemala, 1960—1996: A Quantitative Reflection by Patrick Ball, Paul Kobrak, and Herbert F. Spirer (Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science/Centro Internacional para Investigaciones en Derechos Hu-manos, 1999) (also available in Spanish).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    James Dunn, ‘East Timor: A Case of Cultural Genocide?’ in Genocide: Conceptual and Historical Dimensions, ed. George J. Andreopoulos (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1994), pp.171—190;Google Scholar
  9. Jonathon Barnaby Vessey, Redefining Genocide: East Timor and the United Nations Genocide Convention (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1995), p.28.Google Scholar
  10. 9.
    United States Committee for Refugees; see J. Milton Burr, A Working Document: Quantifying Genocide in the Southern Sudan (Washington, DC: USCR, October 1993).Google Scholar
  11. 10.
    Hurst Hannum and David Hawk, The Case Against the Standing Committee of the Communist Party of Kampuchea (New York: Cambodia Documentation Commission, 1986); andGoogle Scholar
  12. Ben Kiernan, The Pol Pot Regime (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1996). Past trials of Khmer Rouge leaders under the Vietnamese-dominated government of Cambodia are not believed by many to meet international standards. At the time of writing (October 1999), newspapers report that a mixed national/international juridical body to try alleged Khmer Rouge leaders is in formation.Google Scholar
  13. 11.
    Human Rights Watch/Middle East Watch, Iraq’s Crime of Genocide: The Anfal Campaign Against the Kurds (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1955).Google Scholar
  14. 12.
    International Commission of Jurists, The Events in East Pakistan, 1971 (Geneva: ICJ, 1972). For description, analyses, and estimates, see Leo Kuper, Genocide: Its Political Use in the Twentieth Century (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1981), pp.76—80.Google Scholar
  15. 13.
    Rene Lemarchand and David Martin, Selective Genocide in Burundi (London: Minority Rights Group, 1974);Google Scholar
  16. M. Bowen, G. Freeman and Kay Miller, Passing By: The United States and Genocide in Burundi (New York: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 1973);Google Scholar
  17. and Rene Lemarchand, Burundi: Ethnic Conflict and Genocide (Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press/Cambridge University Press, 1994), pp.26–28, 96–105.Google Scholar
  18. 14.
    Report of the Independent Counsel on International Human Rights on the Human Rights Situation in Afghanistan, 42 UN GAOR C. 3 (Agenda Item 12), UN Doc. A/C.3/42/8 (1987), edited and reprinted in W.M. Reisman and C.H. Norchi, ‘Genocide and the Soviet Occupation of Afghanistan’, Institute for the Study of Genocide Newsletter No. 4 (1988), p.7;Google Scholar
  19. and Marek Sliwinski, ‘The Decimation of a People’, Orbis 39 (1989): 33.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Helen Fein

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations