Abstract
In his Poetics, written circa 330 BC, Aristotle claimed that while poets portrayed what was universally true, historians reported on what was specifically the case.1 The inference points clearly to the philosopher’s notion that although both activities are valid, one is on a higher sphere than the other. Whether we hold this judgment to be just or not, it may be useful to pursue Aristotle’s distinction in relation to Holocaust literature and to compare the nature of historical and imaginative writing on the same subject. What are their separate functions, their place, their status?
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Hilda Schiff, Holocaust Poetry (London: Harper Collins; New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1995), p.55.
Danuta Czech, Auschwitz Chronicle 1939–45 (London and New York: I.B. Tauris and Co., 1990).
Daniel Goldhagen, Hitler’s Willing Executioners (London and New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1996).
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2001 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Schiff, H. (2001). The Truths of Poetry. In: Roth, J.K., Maxwell, E., Levy, M., Whitworth, W. (eds) Remembering for the Future. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-66019-3_195
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-66019-3_195
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-80486-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-66019-3
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)