Anne Frank and the American Culture War

The Sexual Politics of Holocaust Memory
  • Arlene Stein


There are, of course, Jewish stories of the Holocaust. But other groups also tell Holocaust stories. Nation states, for example, have utilized Holocaust memories to serve political ends: deflecting charges of complicity, in the case of many European nations, or to make moral claims, in the case of Israel. Increasingly, too, stories about the Holocaust are told by those who have little or no direct relationship to the historical events in question, such as contemporary social movement activists. Sectors of the Far Right in the US and Europe are engaging in Holocaust denial, attempting to erase these memories altogether. But far more commonplace than outright denial are acts of appropriation by social movement activists on the right and the left.


Social Movement Sexual Minority Historical Memory Sexual Politics Nazi Party 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Lauren Berlant, The Queen of America Goes to Washington City: Essays on Sex and Citizenship (Durham, Duke University: 1997).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Charles S. Maier, The Unmasterable Past: History, Holocaust, German National Identity (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998);Google Scholar
  3. Judith Miller, One By One By One (New York: Touchstone/Simon & Schuster 1990);Google Scholar
  4. David Biale, ‘Power, Passivity and the Legacy of the Holocaust’, in Tikkun, 2(1), (1987): 68–73;Google Scholar
  5. Yael Zerubavel, Recovered Roots: Collective Memory and the Making of Israeli National Tradition (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995).Google Scholar
  6. 3.
    Deborah Lipstadt, Denying the Holocaust: The Growing Assault on Truth and Memory (New York: Free Press, 1993);Google Scholar
  7. Lin Collette, ‘Encountering Holocaust Denial’, in Eyes Right! Challenging the Right Wing Backlash, edited by Chip Beriet (Boston: South End Press 1995), pp.246–265.Google Scholar
  8. 5.
    Scott Hunt, Robert Benford and David Snow, ‘Identity Fields: Framing Processes and the Social Construction of Movement Identities’, in New Social Movements, from Ideology to Identity, edited by Enrique Larana, Hank Johnston and Joseph Gusfield (Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1994), p.190.Google Scholar
  9. 6.
    Michael Berenbaum, ‘The Nativization of the Holocaust’, Judaism 35(4), (1986): 447–457.Google Scholar
  10. 7.
    Joshua Gamson, ‘Silence, Death and the Invisible Enemy: AIDS Activism and Social Movement “Newness”’, Social Problems 36(4), (1989): 351–366;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Todd Gitlin, The Whole World is Watching: The Mass Media in the Making and Unmaking of the New Left (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1980).Google Scholar
  12. 8.
    James Davison Hunter, Before the Shooting Begins: Searching for Democracy in America’s Culture War (New York: Free Press, 1994).Google Scholar
  13. 11.
    Cindy Patton, ‘Tremble, Hetero Swine!’ in Fear of a Queer Planet., ed. Michael Warner (Minneapolis: Minnesota University Press 1993), p. 145.Google Scholar
  14. 12.
    Erwin J. Haeberle., ‘Swastika, Pink Triangle, and Yellow Star: The Destruction of Sexology and the Persecution of Homosexuals in Nazi Germany’, in Hidden From History: Reclaiming the Gay & Lesbian Past, eds. Martin Duberman, Martha Vicinus, George Chauncey (New York: Plume, 1989), pp.365–379.Google Scholar
  15. 14.
    This is not to suggest that the Holocaust frame is embraced universally by lesbian/gay activists. For a dissenting view see R. Amy Elman, ‘Triangles and Tribulations: The Politics of Nazi Symbols’, in Journal of Homosexuality 30(3), (1996): 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 17.
    Sara Diamond, Spiritual Warfare: The Politics of the Christian Right (Boston: South End Press, 1989);Google Scholar
  17. Mab Segrest and Leonard Zeskind, Quarantines and Death: The Far Right’s Homophobic Agenda, Center for Democratic Renewal, 1991.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Larry Kramer, Reports front the Holocaust: The Making of an AIDS Activist (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1989); Susan Sontag, ‘AIDS and its Metaphors’, New York Review of Books, 27 October 1988, p.23. Implicit in this ‘genocide frame’ was the belief that gay men constitute an ethnic group roughly comparable to Jews, an idea that came into prominence among US gays in many urban areas in the 1970s. Since homosexuals represent a clearly defined interest group comparable to blacks or Jews, the argument went, they should be able to make demands upon the state in order to take their rightful place in American society. SeeGoogle Scholar
  19. Steven Epstein, ‘Gay Politics, Ethnic Identity: The Limits of Social Constructionism’, in Socialist Review 17(3–4), (1987): 9–50.Google Scholar
  20. 19.
    Susan Johnston, ‘On the Fire Brigade: Why Liberalism Can’t Stop the Anti-Gay Campaigns of the Right’, Critical Sociology, 20(4), (1994): 3–19;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Didi Herman, The Antigay Agenda: Orthodox Vision and the Christian Right (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1997);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lisa Duggan, ‘Queering the State’, Socialtext 39 (1994): 1–14.Google Scholar
  23. 20.
    Gayle Rubin, ‘Thinking Sex’, in The Lesbian and Gay Studies Reader, eds. Henry Abelove, Michele Ann Barale and David Halperin. (New York: Routledge 1993), pp.3–44.Google Scholar
  24. 25.
    Michael Schudson, ‘The Present in the Past Versus the Past in the Present’, Communication 11 (1989): 105–113.Google Scholar
  25. 28.
    Historically, the right has drawn much of its strength, collective identity, and legitimacy from its ability to construct a coherent, visible enemy and to demonize the ‘enemies within.’ Jews and homosexuals have frequently been central to this demonology. After World War II, political anti-Semitism and the belief in a Jewish-communist conspiracy were publicly discredited — Joseph McCarthy, for example, went to some length to avoid association with anti-Semitic anti-communism and the homosexual frequently replaced the Jew as a central figure in rightwing demonology (Herman 1997). See James Ridgeway, Blood in the Face (New York: Thunder’s Mouth Press 1995);Google Scholar
  26. Ann Marie Smith, ‘A Symptomology of an Authoritarian Discourse’, in Erica Carter et. al. (eds.), Cultural Remix: Theories of Politics and the Popular (London: Lawrence & Wishart 1995), pp.299–330.Google Scholar
  27. 34.
    Gillian Liechtling, Jonathon Mazzochi, Steve Gardiner, ‘The Covert Crusade’, Western Progressive Leadership Network (1993); Peter Steinfels, ‘Evangelicals Lobby for Oppressed Christians’, New York Times, 15 September 1996, p.26; Johnston op.cit. Google Scholar
  28. 35.
    Scott Lively, 7 February 1996, Lively Communications, Inc., Salem, OR. See also Scott Lively and Kenneth Abrams, The Pink Swastika (Keizer, OR: Founders Publishing 1995). The Pink Swastika (1995) is authored by Lively, along with Kevin Abrams, who is identified as an Orthodox Jew residing in Israel. The book is a carefully constructed piece of political rhetoric, mixing serious scholarship with lies and outright distortions, truths with half-truths and falsehoods. The authors draw largely upon lesbian/gay scholarly sources to make the argument that many, if not all, of the major leaders of the Nazi movement in Germany were homosexuals — including Hitler, Goebbels, Goering, Himmler and Hess. While they do admit that homosexuals were persecuted by the Nazis, they suggest that homosexuals comprised the core of the Nazi Party. The Pink Swastika explains how homosexuals can be both Nazis and their victims. The authors contend that more masculine, ‘butch’ homosexuals were responsible for building the Nazi party and creating the SA, or Brownshirts. Male homosexual ‘femmes’ were persecuted by the Nazis, but largely escaped death. ‘Regardless of Himmler’s anti-homosexual rhetoric, homosexuals as a class were never targeted for extermination, as their continued role in the Third Reich demonstrates’ (123). Lively and Abrams suggest that the Nazi-homosexual link is rooted in pre-Christian paganism, as in the Roman Empire. Pagans worshipped homosexuality and hated Christianity and Judaism. The Nazi persecution of Jews, following this logic, was a form of retaliation for Jewish suppression of homosexuality. The Pink Swastika concludes with the claim that the contemporary gay rights movement, far from sharing a historical lineage with Holocaust ‘victims’, actually has historical links to the Nazi perpetrators of genocide.Google Scholar
  29. 36.
    Klaus Theweleit, Male Fantasies, vol.1 (Minneapolis: Minnesota University Press, 1987); Haeberle op.cit., p.374.Google Scholar
  30. 38.
    While only a very few Jews are active in Christian right organizations, right-wing Jews have at times been supportive allies of the fundamentalist cause, in part because of its commitment to the state of Israel. Televangelist Pat Robertson is a staunch supporter of Israel who has courted Jewish support while promoting anti-Semitic beliefs in many of his writings. The Christian right supports the protection of Israel for biblical reasons: it suggests that the existence of a Jewish state is a necessary precondition for the second coming of Jesus Christ (Herman, op.cit.). Jewish neo-conservatives, in turn, value fundamentalist support for US military and economic subsidies to Israel. See Philip Zuckerman, ‘Jews and the Christian Right’, Journal of Jewish Communal Service 73(1), (1996): 21–31.Google Scholar
  31. 43.
    Irena Klepfisz, Dreams of an Insomniac: Jewish Feminist Essays, Speeches and Diatribes (Portland: The Eighth Mountain Press, 1990), p.64.Google Scholar
  32. 44.
    Robert Jay Lifton, The Protean Self (New York: Basic Books, 1993), p.217. ‘Facing History and Ourselves’ is a non-profit foundation which trains teachers to incorporate the Holocaust into a curriculum that looks at the relationship between history and individuai moral choices.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Arlene Stein

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations