The Holocaust as History

  • Dan Michman


The ‘beginning of the 21st century’, even though essentially being just a mere technical writing convention with no real inner meaning, will actually turn out to be a significant turning point in future approaches to the Holocaust. Anyone paying attention to the use of language, will testify to the fact, that during the last decade of the 20th century and second millennium (according to the most common calendar, imposed through Christianity and western civilization), there was a public feeling of an approaching ‘peak’ and ‘turning point’. That is, that in spite of the apparent technicality of the date ‘2000’, it exerts a profound impact on the mood of people as well as on their perceptions of the past (and future). Thus, passing into ‘a new century’ can be compared emotionally to somebody descending from a mountain at the other side, losing the first part of his path out of sight. Such feelings and changing perceptions at the turn of centuries have precedents, the most documented one being the fin de siècle phenomenon of the late 19th century. As for ‘The Holocaust’, from now on, then, it will be referred to as an event that happened in a far-away past, just as the French Revolution, the Thirty Years War, or other widely recognized important historical events that happened before ‘our’ century. The Holocaust will lose its status as ‘the worst atrocity of our/this century’, a much-used phrase during the recent decades, showing close intimacy. Moreover, this development is accompanied by the fact of the last direct personal links to the event — survivors, perpetrators and bystanders — rapidly passing away.


Historical Research French Revolution Jewish People Jewish Question Holocaust Denial 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    See: Dan Michman, ‘Research on the Holocaust in Belgium: History and Context’, Belgium and the Holocaust: Jems, Belgians, Germans, ed. Dan Michman (Jerusalem: Yad Vashem, 1998), pp.3–20.Google Scholar
  2. 3.
    Michael R. Marrus, “Good History” and Teaching the Holocaust’, Perspectives (American Historical Association Newsletter) 31/5 (May/June 1993): 1, 6–12;Google Scholar
  3. Dan Diner, ‘Perspektivenwahl und Geschichtserfahrung. Bedarf es einer besonderen Historie des Nationalsozialismus?’ in: Der historische Ort des Nationalsozialismus (Frankfurt am Main: Fischer, 1990), pp.94–113; and the whole volume Probing the Limits of Representation: Nazism and the ‘Final Solution’, ed. Saul Friedlander (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
  4. 8.
    For a most recommended recent introduction see Chris Lorenz, Konstruktion der Vergangenheit. Eine Einfuehrung in die Geschichtstheorie (Koeln: Boehlau Verlag, 1997). The central periodical dedicated to these issues is History and Theory.Google Scholar
  5. 9.
    See: W.H. Walsh, ‘Colligatory concepts in History’, in The Philosophy of History, ed. Patrick Gardiner (London: Oxford University Press, 1974), pp. 127–144.Google Scholar
  6. 10.
    See D. Singer, Knowledge and Remembrance of the Holocaust in Different Countries. Data from American Jewish Committee-sponsored surveys, ([n.p.], 1999), pp.881–882.Google Scholar
  7. 12.
    Jean-Claude Pressac, Technique and Operation of the Gas Chambers (New York: The Beate Klarsfeld Foundation, 1989).Google Scholar
  8. 13.
    Gerald Reitlinger, The Final Solution. The Attempt to Exterminate the Jews of Europe 1939–1945 (London: 1953);Google Scholar
  9. Raul Hilberg, The Destruction of the European Jews (Chicago: Quadrangle Books, 1961).Google Scholar
  10. 14.
    Meldungen aus dem Reich. Auswahl aus den geheimen Lageberichten 1939–1944 (Luchterhand, Neuwied and Berlin: 1965); Otto Dov Kulka, ‘“Public Opinion” in National Socialist Germany and the “Jewish Question”’, Zion 40 (1975): 186–290 [Hebrew];Google Scholar
  11. Ian Kershaw, ‘Antisemitismus und Volksmeinung. Reaktionen auf die Judenverfolgung’, in: Bayern in der NS Zeit, ed. Martin Broszat (Muenchen: Oldenbourg, 1979), pp.281–348;Google Scholar
  12. David Bankier, The Germans and the Final Solution. Public Opinion under Nazism (Oxford, UK and Cambridge, MA: Blackwell, 1992).Google Scholar
  13. 15.
    Goetz Aly and Susanne Heim, Vordenker der Vernichtung. Auschwitz und die deutschen Plaene fuer eine neue europaeische Ordnung (Hamburg: Hoffmann und Campe, 1991);Google Scholar
  14. Goetz Aly, Endloesung. Volksverschiebung und der Mord an den europaeischen Juden (Frankfurt am Main: Fischer, 1995).Google Scholar
  15. 16.
    See for instance the articles by Ulrich Herbert and Christian Gerlach in Nationalsozialistische Vernichtungspolitik 1939–1945. Neue Forschungen und Kontroversen, ed. Ulrich Herbert (Frankfurt am Main: Fischer, 1998);Google Scholar
  16. Ulrich Herbert, Best. Biographische Sudien ueber Radikalismus, Weltanschauung und Vernunft 1903–1989 (Bonn: J.H.W. Dietz Nachfolger, 1996);Google Scholar
  17. A Fischer, Hjalmar Schacht und Deutschlands ‘Judenfrage’. Der ‘Wirtschaftsdiktator’ und die Vertreibung der Juden aus der deutschen Wirtschaft (Koeln, Weimar and Wien: Boehlau, 1995);Google Scholar
  18. Claudia Steur, Theodor Dannecker. Ein Funktionaer der ‘Endloesung’ (Essen: Klartext Verlag, 1997);Google Scholar
  19. Guus Meershoek, Dienaren van het gezag. De Amsterdamse politic tijdens de bezetting (Amsterdam, 1999).Google Scholar
  20. 17.
    See: Johannes C.H. Blom, In de ban van goed en fout? Wetenschappelijke geschiedschrijving over de bezettingstijd in Nederland (Bergen, Holland: Octavo, 1983) [reprinted in: idem., Crisis, bezetting en herstel. Tien studies over Nederland 1930–1950 (Rotterdam and “s Gravenhage: Nijgh en Van Ditmar, 1989), pp.102–120].Google Scholar
  21. 18.
    Dan Michman, ‘“Judenraete” und “Judenvereinigungen” unter nationalsozialistischer Herrschaft. Aufbau und Anwendung eines verwaltungsmaessigen Konzepts’, Zeitschrift fuer Geschichtswissenschaft 46/4, 1998: 294–295; idem., ‘Judenrat’, The Holocaust Encyclopedia, ed. Walter Laqueur (New Haven, CT: Yale UP, 2000) [forthcoming].Google Scholar
  22. 20.
    For an extensive analysis of this issue see Dan Michman, ‘The Holocaust’ in the Eyes of Historians: The Problem of Conceptualization, Periodization and Explanation’, Modern Judaism 15/3 (October 1995): 233–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 21.
    See: Yehuda Bauer, ‘Hashoah uma’avako shel hayishuv kegormim behakamat hamedina’ [The Holocaust and the Struggle of the Yishuv as factors in the Establishment of the State], Hashoa vehatekuma [The Holocaust and the Resurrection], [no editor stated] (Jerusalem: Yad Vashem, 1974), pp.47–62, and an almost collective support of this view in: She’erit Hapletah, 1944–1948. Rehabilitation and Political Struggle, ed. Yisrael Gutman and Avital Saf (Jerusalem: Yad Vashem, 1990). For Friesel’s view see: Evyatar Friesel, ‘The Holocaust: Factor in the Birth of Israel?’, in Major Changes Within the Jewish people in the Wake oft the Holocaust, ed. Israel Gutman (Jerusalem: Yad Vashem, 1996), pp.519–577, and a similar version in: Jehuda Reinharz and Evyatar Friesel, ‘The Zionist Leadership between the Holocaust and the Creation of the State of Israel’, in: Thinking about the Holocaust — After Halfa Century, ed. Alvin Rosenfeld (Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana UP, 1997), pp.83–116. For an analysis of the whole issue from a viewpoint of historical thinking see: Dan Michman, ‘The Causal Connection between the Holocaust and the Birth of Israel: Historiography between Myth and Reality’, Journal of Israeli History (forthcoming: 2000).Google Scholar
  24. 22.
    L.S. Dawidowicz, The War Against the Jews, 1933–1945 (New York: Bantam, 1975), p.xxv.Google Scholar
  25. 24.
    For a first attempt to approach this issue see: Dan Michman, ‘Understanding the Jewish Dimension of the Holocaust’, The Fate of the European Jews, 1939–1945: Continuity or Contingency?, ed. Jonathan Frankel [Studies in Contemporary Jewry XIII] (New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997), pp.225–249.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dan Michman

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations