Skip to main content

The Study of Political Culture

Originally published in A Discipline Divided: Schools and Sects in Political Science, 1990

  • Chapter
Culture and Politics

Abstract

Gabriel Almond, the “dean” of contemporary political culture theory, begins by showing that culture—people’s cognitions, values, and affective commitments—has been central to important explanations of social life for over two thousand years. Moreover, he argues, the terribly destructive “irrational” events of twentieth century (in particular, World Wars I and II and the Holocaust) have underscored the importance of culture, in contrast to rationality, for explaining social life. Indeed, the efficacy of culture in this regard was bolstered at mid-century with developments in measurement theory, social survey techniques, and statistical analysis. Almond explores the origins of contemporary political culture theory, dismissing its critics perhaps too quickly. But his survey of contemporary political culture theory is sure-handed and optimistic about the centrality of future applications to the development of social science.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References and Further Readings

  • Almond, G. 1956. Comparative political systems. Journal of Politics 18: 391–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Almond, G. 1990. The study of political culture. In A discipline divided: Schools and sects in political science. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Almond, G., and J. Coleman. 1960. The politics of developing areas. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Almond, G., and G. B. Powell, Jr. 1966. Comparative politics: A developmental approach. Boston: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Almond, G., and S. Verba. 1963. The civic culture: Political attitudes and democracy in five nations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Almond, G., and S. Verba, eds. 1980. The civic culture revisited. Boston: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckstein, H. 1961. A theory of stable democracy. Princeton, NJ: Center of International Studies, Princeton University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckstein, H. 1988. A culturalist theory of political change. American Political Science Review 82: 789–804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eckstein, H. 1996. Culture as a foundation concept for the social sciences. Journal of Theoretical Politics 8: 471–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elkins, D., and R. E. B. Simeon. 1979. A cause in search of its effect, or what does political culture explain? Comparative Politics 11: 127–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, R. 1977. The silent revolution: Changing values and political styles. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, R. 1988. The renaissance of political culture. American Political Science Review 82: 1203–1230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, R. 1997. Modernization and postmodernization: Cultural, economic and political change in 43 societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, A. 1964. The conduct of inquiry: Methodology for behavioral science. San Francisco: Chandler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, R. 1992. Political culture: Residual category or general theory? Comparative Political Studies 25: 362–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LaPalombara, J. 1964. Interest groups in Italian politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichbach, M., and A. Zuckerman, eds. 1997. Comparative Politics: Rationality, Culture, and Structure. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Limerick, P. N. 1997. The startling ability of culture to bring critical inquiry to a halt. Chronicle of Higher Education (October 24): A76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipset, S. M. 1963. The first new nation: The United States in historical and comparative perspective. New York: Basic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipset, S. M. 1990. Continental divide: Values and institutions of the United States and Canada. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipset, S. M. 1991. American exceptionalism reaffirmed. In Is America different? A new look at American exceptionalism, edited by B. E. Shafer. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipset, S. M. 1996. American exceptionalism: A double-edged sword. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Political Psychology. 1995. 16(1): 1–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R., with R. Leonardi, and R. Y. Nanetti. 1988. Institutional performance and political culture: Some puzzles about the power of the past. Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration 1: 221–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. 1993. Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pye, L., and S. Verba, eds. 1965. Political culture and political development. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, M. H. 1997. Culture and identity in comparative political analysis. In Comparative politics: Rationality, culture, and structure, edited by M. Lichbach and A. Zuckerman. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, M., R. Ellis, and A. Wildavsky. 1990. Cultural theory. Boulder, CO: Westview.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verba, S. 1965. Comparative political culture. In Political culture and political development, edited by L. Pye and S. Verba. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verba, S., S. Kelman, G. Orren, I. Miyake, J. Watanuki, I. Kabashima and G. D. Ferree, jr. 1987. Elites and the idea of equality: A comparison of Japan, Sweden, and the United States. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verba, S., N. Nie, and J. Kim. 1978. Participation and political equality: A seven nation comparison. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, M. 1967. Party building in a new nation: The Indian National Congress. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Lane Crothers Charles Lockhart

Copyright information

© 2000 Lane Crothers and Charles Lockhart

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Almond, G.A. (2000). The Study of Political Culture. In: Crothers, L., Lockhart, C. (eds) Culture and Politics. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-62965-7_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics