Advertisement

Raising the Costs of Conflict, Lowering the Price of Peace: Demilitarisation after Post-modern Conflicts

  • Neil Cooper
Part of the Global Issues Series book series (GLOISS)

Abstract

It is argued in this chapter that the threefold impact of post-modern peace, weapons and conflict has structured the dynamics of the contemporary arms market in a manner that undermines the conventional focus on demilitarisation that hinges directly on the question of what to do about weapons and soldiers in war-torn societies. Furthermore, if the process of demilitarisation is to be effective under such conditions, then traditional approaches need to be augmented by the adoption of structural arms control strategies designed either to raise the costs of war or to lower the price of peace.

Keywords

Structural Adjustment Military Expenditure Peace Process Khmer Rouge Peace Agreement 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Christopher Coker, ‘Post-modernity and the end of the Cold War: has war been disinvented?’, Review of International Studies, vol. 18, no. 3, July 1992, pp. 189–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Edward N. Luttwak, ‘Toward Post-Heroic Warfare’, Foreign Affairs, vol. 74, no. 3, 1995, pp. 109–22; ‘A Post-Heroic Military Policy’, Foreign Affairs, vol. 75, no. 4, 1996, pp. 33–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Malcolm Bradbury, ‘What Was Post-modernism? The arts in and after the Cold War’, International Affairs (special issue), vol. 71, no. 4, 1995, p. 769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Robert Cooper, The Post-Modern State and the World Order, London: DEMOS, 1996, p. 36.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Robin Luckham, ‘Of Arms and Culture’, Current Research on Peace and Violence, vol. 3, no. 1, 1984, pp. 2–3.Google Scholar
  6. 7.
    This term has been borrowed from Rosecrance, although he uses it in a different context. See Richard Rosecrance, ‘The Rise of the Virtual State’, Foreign Affairs, vol. 75, no. 4, 1996, pp. 45–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 9.
    Fabrice Weissman, ‘Liberia: Can Relief Organisations Cope With the Warlords’, in Médecins Sans Frontières, World in Crises: The Politics of Survival at the End of the Twentieth Century, London: Routledge, 1997, p. 104.Google Scholar
  8. 10.
    Ibid., p. 22; Dan Atkinson, ‘Angola Rebels Provoke Crisis in Diamond Trade’, The Guardian, 3 August 1998; Alex Vines, ‘Angola and Mozambique: The Aftermath of Conflict’, Conflict Studies, no. 280, Research Institute for the Study of Conflict and Terrorism, 1995.Google Scholar
  9. 11.
    Stephanie G. Neuman, ‘Controlling the Arms Trade: Idealistic Dream or Realpolitik?’, The Washington Quarterly, vol. 16, no. 3, Summer 1993, pp. 53–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 12.
    Owen Greene, Tackling Light Weapons Proliferation: Issues and Priorities for the EU, London: Saferworld, April 1997, p. 19.Google Scholar
  11. 13.
    Andrew S. Natsios, ‘Humanitarian Relief Intervention in Somalia: The Economies of Chaos’, International Peacekeeping, vol. 3, no. 1, Spring 1996, p. 77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 14.
    John M. Shields and William C. Potter (eds), Dismantling the Cold War: U.S. and C.I.S. Perspectives on the Nunn-Lugar Cooperative Threat Reduction Program, CSIA Studies in International Security, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1997.Google Scholar
  13. 18.
    Cited in Fred Tanner, ‘Consensual Versus Coercive Disarmament’, in UNIDIR, Managing Arms in Peace Processes: the issues, Disarmament and Conflict Resolution Project, New York and Geneva: United Nations, 1996, p. 189.Google Scholar
  14. 19.
    Wolfgang H. Reinicke, ‘Cooperative Security and the Political Economy of Nonproliferation’, in Janne E. Nolan (ed.), Global Engagement: Cooperation and Security in the 21st Century, Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution, 1994, p. 205.Google Scholar
  15. 21.
    Mats Berdal and David Keen, ‘Violence and Economic Agendas in Civil Wars: Some Policy Implications’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies (special issue), ‘War Endings: Reasons, Strategies, and Implications’, vol. 26, no. 3, 1997, p. 806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 23.
    Charles King, Ending Civil Wars, Adelphi Paper, no. 308, Oxford: Oxford University Press/International Institute for Strategic Studies, 1997.Google Scholar
  17. 24.
    David Keen, The Economic Functions of Violence in Civil Wars, Adelphi Paper, no. 320, Oxford: Oxford University Press/International Institute for Strategic Studies, 1998, p. 56.Google Scholar
  18. 26.
    Official Report of the House of Commons, London: HMSO, 22 June 1998, col. 375.Google Scholar
  19. 27.
    UNDP, Human Development Report 1994, Oxford: UNDP/Oxford University Press, 1994, p. 57.Google Scholar
  20. 30.
    Alvaro de Soto and Graciana del Castillo, ‘Obstacles to Peacebuilding’, Foreign Policy, no. 94, Spring 1994, p. 70.Google Scholar
  21. 31.
    Sue Willett, ‘Ostriches, Wise Old Elephants and Economic Reconstruction in Mozambique’, International Peacekeeping, vol. 2, no. 1, Spring 1995, p. 35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 32.
    Paula De Masi and Henri Lorie, ‘How Resilient Are Military Expenditures?’, IMF Staff Papers, vol. 36, March 1989, pp. 130–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 34.
    Oxfam, Debt Relief for Africa: An Oxfam Perspective, Briefing Paper, Oxford: Oxfam Policy Department; Edmund Cairns, A Safer Future: Reducing the Human Cost of War, Oxford: Oxfam Publications, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Neil Cooper

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations