André Gide’s Politics: Rebellion and Ambivalence pp 263-283 | Cite as
Theseus Revisited: Commitment through Myth
- 1 Citations
- 18 Downloads
Abstract
Gide’s relationship to the extraordinarily rich world of Greek mythology is a complex and ambivalent subject, and many modern critical studies have explored various aspects of this relationship, from its presence as a constant aesthetic referent to its potential as a unique discursive framework.2 Indeed, Gide’s interest in myth, as with his attraction to Christian motifs, represents a consistent force throughout his life and a fundamental referential thread throughout his textual corpus, from the 1891 Traité du Narcisse through the 1946 Thésée. Gide employed a mythic backdrop to explore a variety of generic forms, composing mythologically based texts within such forms as the récit, the dramatic text, the sotie, the treatise, the essay, and the Socratic dialogue. References to Greco-Roman myth abound as well in his correspondence and his personal papers, in his conversations and his lectures. Clearly Gide felt a deep attachment to the dynamic system of the ancient modes of thought and art; he obviously discovered in the myths of antiquity something more powerful than merely an evocative historical framework or a provocative narrative structure.
Keywords
Sexual Identity Socratic Dialogue Greek Mythology Greek Myth Ancient ModePreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Works Cited
- Albérès, R.-M. L’Odyssée d’André Gide. Paris: Albin Michel, 1951.Google Scholar
- Albouy, Pierre. Mythes et mythologies de la littérature française. Paris: Colin, 1969.Google Scholar
- Apter, Emily. André Gide and the Codes of Homotextuality. Saratoga, CA: Anma Libri, 1987.Google Scholar
- ——. “Homotextual Counter-Codes: André Gide and the Poetics of Engagement.” Michigan Romance Studies 6 (1986): 75–87.Google Scholar
- Barthes, Roland. “Notes sur André Gide et son journal.” Bulletin des Amis d’André Gide 13.67 (July 1985): 85–105.Google Scholar
- Blanchot, Maurice. “Gide et la littérature d’expérience.” La Part du feu. Paris: Gallimard, 1949. 208–220.Google Scholar
- Bonnefoy, Yves. Entretiens sur la poésie. Neuchâtel: La Baconnière, 1981.Google Scholar
- Brée, Germaine. L’Insaisissable Protée. Paris: Les Belles Lettres, 1970.Google Scholar
- Brontë, Diana. “Le Symbolisme dans l’œuvre d’André Gide jusqu’à L’Immoraliste.” Cahiers André Gide 1. Paris: Gallimard, 1969. 225–240.Google Scholar
- Brosman, Catharine Savage. “Gide’s Criticism of Symbolism.” Modem Language Review 61.4 (October 1966): 601–609.Google Scholar
- Brunei, Pierre, ed. Dictionnaire des mythes littéraires. Paris: Éditions du Rocher, 1989.Google Scholar
- Camus, Albert. L’Été. Paris: Gallimard, 1959.Google Scholar
- Deschodt, Éric. Gide, « le contemporain capital ». Paris: Perrin, 1991.Google Scholar
- Durand, Gilbert. Figures mythiques et visages de l’œuvre. Paris: Berg, 1979.Google Scholar
- Eigeldinger, Marc. Mythologie et intertextualité. Geneva: Slatkine, 1987.Google Scholar
- Fernandez, Ramon. Gide ou le courage de s’engager. Paris: Klincksieck, 1985.Google Scholar
- Foucault, Michel. L’Usage des plaisirs. Vol. 2 of L’Histoire de la sexualité. Paris: Gallimard, 1984.Google Scholar
- Genova, Pamela A. André Gide dans le labyrinthe de la mythotextualité. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
- Germain, Gabriel. “André Gide et les mythes grecs.” Entretiens sur André Gide. Ed. Marcel Arland and Jean Mouton. Paris: Mouton, 1967. 41–67.Google Scholar
- Gide, André. “Considérations sur la mythologie grecque.” Œuvres complètes. Vol. 9. Ed. Louis Martin-Chauffier. Paris: Gallimard, 1935. 147–154.Google Scholar
- ——. Journal. 2 vols. Paris: Gallimard, Bibliothèque de la Pléiade, 1951, 1954.Google Scholar
- ——. The Journals of André Gide. Ed. and trans. Justin O’Brien. 4 vols. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1947–1951.Google Scholar
- ——. Le Prométhée mal enchaîné. Romans, récits et soties, œuvres lyriques. Ed. Yvonne Davet and Jean-Jacques Thierry. Paris: Gallimard, Bibliothèque de la Pléiade, 1958. 301–341.Google Scholar
- ——. Si le grain ne meurt. Romans, récits et soties, œuvres lyriques. Vol. 2. Paris: Gallimard, Bibliothèque de la Pléiade, 1954. 349–616.Google Scholar
- ——. Thésée. Romans, récits et soties, œuvres lyriques. Ed. Yvonne Davet and Jean-Jacques Thierry. Paris: Gallimard, Bibliothèque de la Pléiade, 1958. 1413–1453.Google Scholar
- ——. “Thoughts on Greek Mythology.” Pretexts. Trans. Jeffrey J. Carre. New York: Delta, 1959. 227–233.Google Scholar
- ——. Two Legends: “Oedipus” and “Theseus”. Trans. John Russell. New York: Vintage, 1958.Google Scholar
- Gide, André, and Paul Valéry. Correspondance André Gide—Paul Valéry. Ed. Robert Mallet. Paris: Gallimard, 1955.Google Scholar
- Ireland, G. W. André Gide: A Study of His Creative Writings. Oxford: Clarendon, 1970.Google Scholar
- Lévy, Zvi H. “André Gide entre Œdipe et Thésée.” French Studies 44.1 (January 1990): 34–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lucey, Michael. Gide’s Bent: Sexuality, Politics, Writing. New York: Oxford University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
- Magny, Claude-Edmonde. “A propos du Thésée—l’éthique secrète d’André Gide.” Poésie 36 (December 1946): 82–94.Google Scholar
- Marty, Éric. André Gide——Qui êtes-vous? avec les entretiens Jean Amrouche et André Gide. Lyon: La Manufacture, 1987.Google Scholar
- Moutote, Daniel. André Gide——L’Engagement (1926–1939). Paris: SEDES, 1991.Google Scholar
- Pollard, Patrick. André Gide: Homosexual Moralist. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
- ——. “The Sources of André Gide’s Thésée.” Modem Language Review 65.2 (April 1970): 290–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sartre, Jean-Paul. “Gide vivant.” Les Temps Modernes 65 (1951): 1537–1541.Google Scholar
- Sellier, Philippe. “Qu’est-ce qu’un mythe littéraire?” Littérature 55 (October 1984): 112–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Stoltzfus, Ben. Gide’s Eagles. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press, 1969.Google Scholar
- Tournier, Michel. “La dimension mythologique.” Le Vent Paraclet. Paris: Gallimard, 1977. 151–210.Google Scholar
- Watson-Williams, Helen. André Gide and the Greek Myth. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1967.Google Scholar
- Yourcenar, Marguerite. “Aspects d’une légende et histoire d’une pièce.” Théâtre II. Paris: Gallimard, 1971. 165–179.Google Scholar